Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D03-0008
Parcel: 13815015C

Address:
6635 S 12TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D03-0008
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/10/2003 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/11/2003 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Development Plan is approved 4/11/03.
03/27/2003 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
D03-0008
SHELTON T SHAW A.I.A.
WALGREENS 12TH/VALENCIA
03/31/2003 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: March 28, 2003

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0008 Walgreen's - 12th and Valencia: Development Plan


CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Staff has reviewed and has no comments.
04/03/2003 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied PIMA COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207

CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586
Director FAX: (520) 740-6380
April 02, 2003

TO: Sheldon T. Shaw, R.A., Robert Kubicek Architects, Inc.

THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services

FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater)
Pima County Development Review Division

SUBJECT: Walgreens - 12th Avenue and Valencia Road
Development Plan - 1st Submittal
D03-0008



We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use:

1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date.

2. Based on this project lying within the boundaries of an old sewer improvement district, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates.

3. Show the total number of proposed and existing number of Wastewater Fixture Unit Equivalents for each phase in the General Notes. Use Table 13.20.040(F)(1) in Pima County Code 13.20.040(F) to calculate the number of Wastewater Fixture Unit Equivalents.

Based on the total number of fixture units proposed for the entire project, a Sewer Service Agreement will be prepared for this project, if required. The signed Sewer Service Agreements must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the development plan.

4. Sheet C-1: Revise the 1st Wastewater Management Note to read,

ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS.

5. Sheet C-1: Replace the last Wastewater Management Note with one that reads,

A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT.

6. Sheet C-2: Show the plan number (M-137) for the existing 6" public sewer line along the east side of the property.

7. Sheet C-2: Label the existing HCS lines as such or show them differently than the existing public sewer lines.

8. Sheet C-2: Has the location of existing sewer line M-137 been field verified? It is shown on this development plan as lying partially on Lot 8 of the Elstone subdivision (Book 8, Maps & Plats, Page 17) and partially on the lot to the east. PCWWM’s as-builts show this sewer line lying entirely on Lot 8. Please advise/revise as necessary.

9. Sheet C-2: Show the off-site portion of the 10' sewer easement granted by Docket 757, Page 142 and the 10' electrical easement granted by Docket 928, Page 262. The development plan must show enough of the property to the west for us to understand how 24 hour, all-weather vehicular access will be maintained to existing sewer line M-137.

10. Sheet C-2: An existing water line has been shown on the property to the east. Is this water line within an easement? If so, show and label this easement.

11. Sheet C-2: When will the "Future Cross Access" occur? Phase 1? Phase 2? After Phase 2?

12. Sheets C-2 and C-3: PCWWM’s large and heavy maintenance vehicles cannot traverse the the vertical curbing of the landscape islands to reach the manhole and the terminal cleanout in existing sewer line M-137. Revise as necessary to provide un-restricted vehicular access to the manhole and the terminal cleanout in existing sewer line M-137.

13. Show a new public sewer access easement, being created by separate instrument, for PCWWM’s maintenance vehicles. This easement must be designed to allow these maintenance vehicles to enter the property, service both the manhole and the terminal cleanout in existing sewer line M-137, and then exit the property without going outside the boundaries of the access easement. PCWWM’s maintenance vehicles have a minium inside turning radius of 35' and a minimum outside turning radius of 55'.

A legal description and location map of the Public Sewer Access Easement must be submitted on separate 8½" x 11" sheets. These documents must include all of the following:
a) A survey tie from a found survey monument at a commonly known point to the Point of Beginning of the easement. All markings on the found monument must be fully described in these documents.
b) A bearing and distance for each tangent portion of the easement and the radius, included angle and arc length of each curved portion of the easement.

We will review these documents, and forward them to the Pima County’s Real Property Division staff for further processing, if they are acceptable.

Also, please see item 1.b on page 17 of the Pima County Development Plan Requirements checklist, effective September 1, 2000, for a list of other documents that must accompany the legal description and location map to meet Real Property’s requirements.

14. Sheet C-3: Show the existing sewer line M-137 in Details 2 & 5.

15. Would the owner of this property, and the owner of the property to the east, consider requesting that all or part of public sewer line M-137 be abandoned and converted into a private sewer line? This may be the easiest way to address many of these issues.

16. Any plantings over existing sewer line M-137 must comply with PCWWM’s latest policies regarding landscaping in public sewer easements. Please contact me if you need copies of these policies.

17. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563.




Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater)
Pima County Development Review Division


TR/tr

Copy: Project
04/03/2003 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No objection
04/03/2003 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


Telephone: 520-884-3879
Fax: 520-770-2002
WR#103340 March 27, 2003


Knudsen-Smith Engineering
7902 N. Black Canyon Highway, Suite 101
Phoenix, Arizona 85051

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: Walgreen’s 12th & Valencia
D03-0008

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the Development Plan dated February 27, 2003. There are existing electrical facilities existing within the boundaries of the proposed site, which have been depicted correctly on the Plan. In the event the facilities require relocation or rotation due to reduced clearance from the building, the costs shall be borne by the developer.

Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:

Randy Alday
Distribution Services – DS301
Tucson Electric Power Company
P. O. Box 711
Tucson, AZ 85702

Please call me at (520) 884-3879, should you have any questions.

Sincerely,



S. Glynda Rothwell
Right-of-Way Agent
Land Management

sgr
cc: C. Gross, City of Tucson
04/03/2003 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Transportation Information for Rezoning,
Subdivision and Development Review Requests
File Number Description Date Reviewed
Pima Association of Governments
Transportation Planning Division
177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405
Tucson, AZ 85701
Phone: (520) 792-1093
Fax: (520) 792-9151
www.pagnet.org
D03-0008 Walgreens 4/3/2003
1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street
2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Planned Action:
STREET IDENTIFICATION
3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic
4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E”
5. Existing Number of Lanes
9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development
(Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips)
8. Future Number of Lanes
TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS
10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance)
11. Existing or Planned Bikeway
Remarks:
Street Number 1 Street Number 2
Year Year
Planned Action:
VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS
6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed
7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E”
Valencia Rd (12th Ave to 6th Ave)
No 0
37,200
63,000
6
63,000
40,685
6
1,284
Route 29, 30 minutes, 0 miles
Planned bike route with striped shoulder
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
04/07/2003 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval for this DP

1. Show and label with dimensions (ie. 20x110) SVT's for both existing and future ROW conditions at all access points to the subject property.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us
04/07/2003 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D03-0008 WALGREENS 12TH/VALENCIA/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: April 4, 2003


The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

APPROVED EXCEPT:

LABEL SECTION LINES ON VICINITY MAP ON FINAL MYLAR.

NOTE:

1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.
04/08/2003 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D03-0008 Walgreens 12th/Valencia 04/07/03

() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-72-57

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12thAve-Valencia Rd. Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes (Gateway)

COMMENTS DUE BY: 4/07/03

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(X) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(X) Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 03/18/03

Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments
D03-0008, Walgreens 12th Ave./Valencia Rd.
March 18, 2003

The proposed site is commercial zoned and located southeast of the Valencia Road and 12th Avenue intersection. Existing site improvements include an abandoned strip mall with two detached commercial buildings along the Valencia Road frontage.

The applicant included in the submittal a letter dated May 3, 2002, in which the City of Tucson has indicated it can consider a minor change to the approved development plan without going back to Mayor and Council, subject to the applicant making the following three revision to their revised development plan, they are:

While limited (one) access to the local street is acceptable due to the commercial development to the south, across the street. This access point should be shared with the eastern half of the original development site.

Cross-access to the eastern portion of the original development should be provided across the front of the developments on the Valencia frontage as shown on the approved development plan.

Right-of-way dedication, per the MS&R Plan, for 12th and Valencia are required. In order to facilitate the redevelopment, this can be accomplished after CDRC review based on a development agreement.

Bases on this information and review of the revised development plan, the Comprehensive Planning Task Force provides the following comments.

1. The above items # 1 & 2 have been address in the revised development plan. However, item # 3 needs to be addressed, as part of the submittal. Staff is requesting a written confirmation from the applicant to address and confirm the right-of-way dedication requirements as part of this minor revision to the approved development plan prior to approval.

Since the proposed development is indicated to be constructed into phases, please provide a written response to the following issues.

What will be the interim use of that portion of the development within the boundaries of phase (2), prior to the construction/completions of phase (2) development?
In the interim stage of phase (2), indicate how it will be maintained, screened, buffered, and protected from potential unapproved land use activities. In the vicinity there has been some unapproved temporary land uses along arterial street frontages.

3. Please indicate the interim land improvements within phase (2), prior to pad construction. Please provide an interim landscape plan for phase (2). Take into consideration, dust control, screening, buffering and lighting and how these interim improvements will improve the view shed along 12th Avenue and Lerdo Road.
04/09/2003 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT: D03-0008
Walgreen's
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: April 9, 2003

DUE DATE: April 7, 2003

COMMENTS:

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 10, 2004.

2. Add the to the location map the City of Tucson / Tohono O'ODHAM Nation corporate limits along the Los Reales Roadway. Label the scale of the location map, the minimum scale factor must be 3"=1 mile and the adjacent section numbers. Revise as required. DS 2-05.2.1.D

3. Add a brief legal description to the title block i.e., NW ¼ of the NW ¼ of Section 13 T.15.R.13. DS 2-05.2.1.G.2

4. A legend, which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing, is to be placed on the plan, preferably on the first sheet. Also please review keynotes and revise as required. Many of the keynote numbers are pointing to items on the plan that do not match the respective keynotes. In addition many of keynotes are missing from the plan. DS 2-05.2.1.J

5. This site is subject to the conditions of rezoning case C9-72-57. List the rezoning case number and list the conditions of rezoning on the plan. A copy of the rezoning case authorization letter must be provided with the next development plan submittal packet. For reference, list the "annexation" case number C9-60-39. All case numbers should be listed in the lower right corner next to the title block of all development, landscape, and NPPO plan sheets. DS 2-05.2.1.K, DS 2-05.2.2.B.2, and DS 2-05.2.2.B.7

6. List the owners telephone number under the owner's text block, which is on sheet C-1. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1

7. List as a general note: "Existing zoning is C-1." DS 2-05.2.2.B.1

8. This project has been assigned the following development plan case number D03-0008. List the development plan case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all development, landscaper, and NPPO plan sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2

9. Under the proposed use text block list the proposed use of the property as follows. Commercial Use Group: Food Service DD "28", Subject to LUC section 3.5.4.6.A and .G, and Retail Use Group: General Merchandise DD "28", Subject to LUC section 3.5.9.2.C. As reference under the same text block list the existing use of the site. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3

10. This site is subject to the criteria of the Major Streets and Routes (MSR) Setback Zone LUC Section 2.8.3 and the Gateway Corridor Zone Luc Section 2.8.4. List as a general note that states that this project has been designed to meet the criteria of both the overlay zones noted above. The statement must refer to both overlay zones. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10

11. List as a general note the gross area of the site in square feet and acreage. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11

12. Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot. I acknowledge that the existing site boundary information and basis of bearing has been provided. The future boundary of the site as it relates to the north and west boundaries after the required dedication of land for future right-of-way must be labeled. DS 2-05.2.3.A

13. Indicate by response if all existing or proposed easements have been listed and shown on the plan. If not please show location, purpose, width, recordation information, and if new or existing. Also if applicable indicate if any existing easements are to be relocated or abandoned because of new building locations or new site construction. If abandonment is to occur list the recordation information for each easement. DS 2-05.2.3.B and DS 2-05.2.4.G

14. Future curbs and sidewalks along Valencia Road and 12th Avenue must be shown, labeled and dimensioned to the centerline or construction centerline as determined by the City Engineer. The width of the future sidewalk must be labeled and the future face of curb location to the future property line along Valencia Road and 12th Avenue must be labeled to verify applicable street perimeter building setbacks. The existing curb to property line dimensioned for Lerdo Road must be labeled. DS 2-05.2.3.C

15. Per the listed legal description on sheet C-1 it appears that the existing three lots which make up the original lot 8 of subdivision map and plat 8/17 have been combined into one lot. If this is so please provide a copy of the recorded lot combo covenant and Pima County Assessor's Tax Code Parcel combo form. If the lot has not been combined please download a copy of the Lot Combo Covenant from the Development Services Department web site and file a Parcel Tax Code Parcel application with the Pima County Assessor's office to combine the three tax code parcels into one. Call me if you require additional information regarding this specific comment. DS 2-05.2.4.A

16. If the project is to be phased as indicated on the plan, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. DS 2-05.2.4.C

17. Label the widths of PAALs adjacent to the north of Pad 2 and future cross access PAAL along the east side of the site. The width of the Walgreen's drive through must also be dimensioned. The minimum width required is 11 and may be reduced to 9 feet at the window area only. In the C-1 zone only one drive through lane is allowed per business use proposing drive through lanes. The vehicle stacking must be shown dimensioned and labeled. The minimum stacking spaces required within the drive through lane is six vehicles with a minimum length of 18 feet each. The stacking spaces may not interfere or be provided with a required PAAL area and the spaces may not be placed over a pedestrian circulation path (crosswalk). Indicate on the plan if access between Pad 1 and the Walgreen's will be provided in the future Phase. Also the Docket and Page for the future cross access between the Walgreen's and the development to the east must be listed on the plan. DS 2-05.2.2.4.D.3

18. Provide documents that relate to and support the dedication of right-of-way for both 12th Avenue and Valencia Road. Contact Jim Rossi with the City of Tucson Real Estate Division with regards to the acceptance of right-of-way and required documents. The recordation information / docket and page number for the right-of-way dedication documents must be listed on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.E

19. Label the distance of the proposed structures from the future curb locations along the 12th Avenue, Valencia Road and from the back of existing curb along Lerdo Road. I acknowledge that the building setbacks area greater than what is required. For reference and verification of building locations please label as required. DS 2-05.2.4.I

20. Per DS 2-08.4. Sidewalks. Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicular
travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks, and must meet the following location requirements.

At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project.

Sidewalks must connect all areas of the development and must connect to the Pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent street.

Composition. Sidewalks will be constructed of:
1. Portland cement concrete, four (4) inches thick, with a smooth or broomfinish;
or
2. Brick pavers set in a bed of cement; or
3. Any surface equivalent in smoothness, hardness, and durability. Asphalt or asphalt concrete may be used only for jogging paths, nature trails which are part of an accessible route, and pedestrian refuge areas which are not required to be connected to the pedestrian circulation path, as listed in Sec. 2-08.3.1.

The sidewalks must be handicap accessible and must have accessible ramps. The landings at the back of all proposed accessible ramps must be labeled.

A sidewalk that connects to the onsite circulation system must be provided from the sidewalk adjacent to Pad 2 to the Lerdo Road sidewalk. All sidewalks must be constructed of concrete and must be physically separated from the vehicular use area except where the circulation crosses a PAAL (Parking Area Access Area Lane). The portions of the sidewalk area between the west side PAAL and the double row of parking spaces must be concrete and physically separated. Label all sidewalk widths or add a key that states that all sidewalks are a specific width. The minimum width for all sidewalks is four feet unless rezoning conditions requires a greater width. Revise as required. DS 2-05.2.4.K

21. Pad 2 must be provided with two (2) 12 feet wide by 35 feet long loading zones. All loading zones must be shown and dimensioned. The maneuverability into and out of the loading zones must be demonstrated. See additional comments by the Engineering reviewer related to maneuverability. DS 2-05.2.4.O

22. Add a detail drawing for both a standard and handicap vehicle parking spaces. The detail drawing must be dimensioned, show wheel stops that are located two and one half (2-1/2) feet from the front of the parking space. All vehicle-parking spaces that abut a sidewalk, landscape border, property line, or screen wall must be provided with wheel stops. See DS 3-05 for more info on vehicular use areas.

23. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. DS 2-05.2.4.Q

24. Show sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. Existing and future sight visibility triangles must be shown and labeled. Additional comments will be forthcoming on the next review due location of vehicle parking, signs and some of the landscaping screens may affect the sight visibility within the triangle. DS 2-05.2.4.R

24. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning C9-72-57. DS 2-05.2.4.U


25. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. DS 2-05.2.4.V

27. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) including billboards to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and those minimal location requirements can be met. DS 2-05.2.4.W

28. Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. For submittal with a development plan, a conceptual landscape plan showing typicals of proposed planting areas is sufficient. A detailed landscape plan is required at the time of application for permits. For more specific information, refer to Development Standard 2-07.0.

29. Add a Land Use Code Data block that indicates the number of vehicle/bicycle parking spaces including handicap spaces, loading zones required and provided, Floor Area Ratio allowed and proposed, building heights allowed and proposed, Proposed principal uses and subject to LUC sections, development designators for each use, required and proposed building setbacks etc. Please include individual calculations for each phase.

30. Because of the amount of existing culture on the site and shown on the plan the drawing and information is very hard to read. A lot of the notes and dimensions are covered by other notes and are not legible. If it is essential to show existing culture on the plan please add a second and possibly a third sheet that can provide all required information and provide a drawing that is legible. A recommendation, Show the existing site and development with the existing culture on one sheet and show the proposed development on another sheet. If the development is to be phased as indicated on the plan and the phases will incorporate existing buildings, parking spaces and areas, and sidewalks a third sheet may be necessary.

As indicated in a previous comment a number of the keynote numbers were not shown on the plan and some of the keynotes are pointing to culture that does not math the note.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D030008dp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plans, landscape plans, details, and required documents as noted in the comments.
04/09/2003 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Walgreens - 12th/Valencia
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 8 April 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D03-0008

Resubmittal Required: Development Plan/Drainage Report/Landscape Plan

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report received on 10 March 2003. Approvals are not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DEVELOPMENT PLAN:
1. Provide a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile on the project location map (DS 2-05.2.1 D);
2. Provide a basis of bearings (DS 2-05.2.3 A);
3. Depict and label where applicable the adjacent right-of-way recordation data, type and fully dimensioned width of existing and proposed paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks (DS 2-05.2.3 C & 2-05.2.4 D 2);
4. Provide existing contour lines at intervals not to exceed those stated in the "Existing Site Conditions" requirements (DS 2-05.2.3 E);
5. Development Standards require that phasing of a development, as is proposed, must be clearly demonstrated on the plan, with depiction of any temporary improvements that may be needed to demonstrate the site will function for each phase as one entity. Any temporary improvements that may be needed to provide for such must be clearly depicted and labeled on the plan (DS 2-05.2.4 C);
6. Label and dimension from street monument lines to curb and sidewalk locations, in addition to the street widths and utility locations noted (DS 2-05.2.4 D 2);
7. Clearly label the 12th Avenue and Valencia Road right of way dedications required, per the May 3, 2002 letter from the City of Tucson Planning Department (item 3), in accordance with the City of Tucson's Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan (DS 2-05.2.4 E);
8. Depict and label existing and future (MS&R) sight visibility triangles (DS 2-05.2.4 I, R & DS 3-01.5.0);
9. Depict and label new 6' sidewalk along Valencia Road right of way, 2' from back of curb. If existing, label and dimension accordingly (DS 2-05.2.4 L);
10. Depict solid waste vehicle maneuverability and access for the proposed dumpster locations, and provide a typical enclosure detail, fully dimensioned and labeled (DS 2-05.2.4 T). Please note that onsite refuse provision development standards, including dumpster placement, access to and from, enclosure and bin requirements, etc., can be found in DS 6-01.0;
11. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with rezoning conditions (DS 2-05.2.4 U);
12. It is not clear what the hatching on the plan represents - please provide a note for such in the legend.
13. Revise Engineer's General Note # 5, to indicate work in accordance with City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details and Specifications for Public Improvements (1994 ed.);
14. Provide a minimum sidewalk thickness in detail 2, sheet 1;
15. Depict and label the detention basin 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevation (DS 2-05.2.4 H 1);
16. Provide all retention/detention basin dimensions, including basin top and bottom elevations with sideslopes noted. Include all basin details and cross-sections (inlet/outlet details, splash pad/riprap notes and details, etc.), fully labeled and dimensioned (DS 2-05.2.4 H 4);
17. Provide a note or notes on the plan addressing basin maintenance responsibility and liability, in accordance with the SMDDFM, section 14.3.2;
18. Address roof drainage direction(s) and associated sidewalk scuppers for conveyance under sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F);
19. Prior to grading activity, approved grading plans and stormwater pollution prevention plans will be required for this development.

DRAINAGE REPORT:
1. Drainage report content and format requirements shall be in accordance with Section 2.3.1 of the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (SMDDFM). The consultant is encouraged to review these minimum requirements for report resubmittal (DS 10-02.0);
2. The report must address balanced basin flow attenuation requirements, in accordance with City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations (Tucson Code, section 26-10), SMDDFM, section 3.3, and Pima County/City of Tucson (PC/COT) Stormwater Retention/Detention Manual, sections 1.4 & 2.1. At a minimum it must be demonstrated that developed conditions runoff rates do not exceed existing condition rates during the 2-10, and 100-year storm events (DS 10-01.0 &10-02.0);
3. The report must address 5-year threshold retention requirements, in accordance with the PC/COT Retention/Detention Manual, sections 1.4 & 2.2 (DS 10-01.0);
4. The equations provided in the Retention/Detention manual are for determining preliminary values for estimated retention/detention storage volumes. Appropriate values must then be used as a starting point for required reservoir routing, in accordance with sections 3.3.2 & 3.3.3 paragraph 2, and SMDDFM, Section 2.3.1.6 The consultant may wish to verify existing impervious area on the site, as contrasted with developed/proposed conditions area (DS 10-01.0);
5. Provide a detailed inspection list and basin performance criteria for reference by the Engineer responsible for annual and as-needed maintenance inspections of the basins, as required (SMDDFM, Sections 1.5.2 & 2.3.1.6 C);
6. Specify the name, address, and telephone number of the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies responsible for the ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and liability of drainage improvements described in the report (SMDDFM, Sec. 2.3.1.2 E); The report shall reference the specific inspection report requirements outlined in Section 14.3.3 (see item 5, above);
7. Include certification that the proposed drainage plan, once properly constructed, will adhere to Local, State and Federal Floodplain Regulations (SMDDFM, Sec. 2.3.1.7 B);
8. Percolation test results are required to be submitted with the drainage report, demonstrating sufficient infiltration rates. Test procedures should be performed at or below proposed basin bottom elevations and should be in accordance with the recommended procedures of the Pima County Department of Transportation - Flood/Control District;
9. Address basin maintenance access ramp requirements (SMDDFM, Sections 2.3.1.6 b & 14.3.4).


LANDSCAPE PLAN:

1. Demonstrate water harvesting in landscape areas to the maximum extent reasonably possible, per Land Use Code, Section 3.7.4, and SMDDFM, Sec. 14.2.10.


Please provide a revised Drainage Report with percolation test results, Development Plan and Landscape Plan.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
04/09/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) The landscape and development plan must be revised to provide consistent information regarding the location of improvements including building location/size, location of refuse storage facilities and loading areas, etc. DS 2-07.2.1.A

2) Sheet C-2 contains a number of architect keyed notes that are not used on the drawing. These should be removed or utilized as appropriate. DS 2-05.0
Keynotes also require revision to ensure accurate use on the plans.
The inclusion of excessive information regarding existing site conditions may unecessarily complicate the drawing. See DS 2-05.2.3 for the plan content requirements.

3) The landscape plans must be revised to reflect the phasing proposal.
Per LUC 3.7.3.5 "The perimeter screening element along the property lines must be installed during development of the first phase.
Per LUC 3.7.2.7 "All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution." This requirement applies to all disturbed portions of the site not developed as part of phase 1.

4) The requirements for landscape borders per LUC 3.7.2.4 must be met within the minimum ten-foot wide buffer located on site, measured from the MS&R right of way line. Revise the landscape plan to include at minimum one tree for every thirty-three feet, and 50% vegetative coverage in the code required landscape border. This border should be installed as part of phase 1.

5) The landscape improvements proposed with within the MS&R right of way area must be approved by the City Engineer. Written verification of any approvals received is required prior to plan approval. LUC 3.7.2.9

6) Additional comments regarding screening (LUC 3.7.3) may apply pending plan revisions. Currently the landscape plan indicates loading areas which require screening from Valencia Road. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

7) Show the current and future sight visibility triangles on the landscape and development plans. LUC 3.7.3.4
Any stuctures, plantings, or walls which exceed the height restrictions must be moved outside of the SVT's. DS 3-01.5.0

8) As desribed in comment #3, areas of the site not included in phase one which are not landscaped, developed, or paved must meet the dust control provisions of LUC 3.7.2.7.

9) Address the apparent conflict between the class 1 bike parking area shown on C-2 and the plantings on L-1 in the planter area adjacent to the pad 2 building.

10) The Native Plant Preservation Application has been accepted and approved.
04/10/2003 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Passed