Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D03-0006
Parcel: 10309074H

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D03-0006
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/26/2003 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/27/2003 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Development Plan is approved 2/27/03.
03/05/2003 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
D03-0006
JOHN A EVANS & ASSOC.
SOUTHWEST AMBULANCE FACILITY
03/13/2003 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Case Number: D03-0006
Project Name: Southwest Ambulance Facility
Estimated Traffic Generation: 139 trips
03/21/2003 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied A street landscape border is required along the entire River Park Drive frontage. LUC 3.7.2.4

2) Identify the type of screening proposed along River Park Drive on the landscape plan. Revise the site and landscape plan to locate the screening consistently on both plans.

3) Screening may only be located within the street landscape border under certain conditions. See LUC 3.7.3.2.C and revise all plans as necessary.

4) The landscape plan should be revised to designate dg in the Commerce Drive right of way area where appropriate. LUC 3.7.2.4.

Resubmittal of the landscape and development plan is required.
03/25/2003 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied PIMA COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207

CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586
Director FAX: (520) 740-6380
April 7, 2003

TO: John Evans, John A. Evans & Associates

THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services

FROM: Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager
Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions

SUBJECT: Southwest Ambulance Facility
Development Plan - 1st Submittal
D03-006



We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use:

1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date.

2. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates.

3. Add the Development Plan case number, D03-006, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers.

4. Add reference numbers C12-86-16 and C9-79-37.

5. Show the proposed number of Wastewater Fixture Units in the General Notes. Based on that number, a Sewer Service Agreement will be prepared for this project, if required. The signed Sewer Service Agreements should be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Development Plan.

6. Please review Pima County Development Plan, check list section G, pages 21 and 22 and add all appropriate notes as required.

7. Sheet two of two is not clear where proposed and existing sanitary sewer is located (per Pima County Development Plan Requirements - Section G, pages 21 and 22). Correct appropriately.

8. Please be advised, Glenn Hitz, P.E. of Wastewater Management has no objection to the request for abandonment of River Park Drive if you would provide access from Commerce Drive to Manhole 1749-40. Please contact Glenn at 740-6547 for additional information regarding this issue.

9. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

On April 11, 2003, Pima County Ordinance 2003-29 will go into effect. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of a development plan or subdivision plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second submittal. If the required resubmittal will occur on, or after, April 11, 2003, and will also consist of two sheets, a check for $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact Debbie Ketchem at 740-6404.




Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager
Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions


SR/SR/dk
Copy: Project
03/25/2003 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied SUBJECT: Southwest Ambulance Facility
REVIEWER: Doug Williams
DATE: 24 March 2003
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D03-0006

Resubmittal Required: Development Plan/Drainage Report/Landscape Plan
$150.00 Drainage Review Fee

SUMMARY: Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report received on March 21, 2003. Approval of the Development Plan and Drainage Report is not recommended at this time. The following comments are offered:

DEVELOPMENT PLAN:
1. The Development Plan must address River Park Drive public roadway improvements to be constructed with this development, in accordance with rezoning condition # 7. Refer to Development Standards (DS) 3-01.0 and 3-01.4.5 E. Contact Tucson Department of Transportation (TDOT), Engineering Division/Permits and Codes Section (791-5100) for Private Improvement Agreement (PIA) inquiries and arrangements;
2. Provide a General (drainage) Note that, "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations", as determined in the drainage report (DS 2-05.2.2 C 2 a);
3. Please address the apparent discrepancy between this project's basis of bearing for the centerline of Commerce Center Drive and that indicated on Book 54 Page 45 (Final Plat) of N 12° 22' 25"E (DS 2-05.2.3 A);
4. Depict and label where applicable the adjacent right-of-way recordation data, type and fully dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks (DS 2-05.2.3 C & 2-05.2.4 D 2);
5. Depict and label the 100-year flood limits and water surface elevations, where flows are 100 cubic feet/second (cfs), or greater. Include depiction of the Erosion Hazard Setback for the Santa Cruz River (DS 2-05.2.3 I 1 & 2-05.2.4 H 6);
6. Depict and label the west detention/retention basin 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevation (DS 2-05.2.4 H 1);
7. Indicate proposed ground elevations at a few more points in the open area and the south parking area for reference to future grading and site drainage. Also, clarify the grade break spot elevation of 70.07 at north side of the northeast parking area. Provide retention/detention basin dimensions, top and bottom elevations, with basin sideslopes noted (DS 2-05.2.4 H 4);
8. Depict locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance and discharge points - specifically provide contributing drainage areas and Q100's for flows entering and exiting at property lines (DS 2-05.2.4 H 7 & the City of Tucson's Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management SMDDFM, Section 5.2);
9. Address roof drainage direction(s) and associated sidewalk scuppers for conveyance under sidewalk areas (DS 2-08.4.1 E and 3-01.4.4 F);
10. Revise the sheet index to reflect 2 sheets, as submitted.
11. Prior to grading activity, approved grading plans, stormwater pollution prevention plans and a floodplain use permit will be required

DRAINAGE REPORT:

1. Address unobstructed access/maintenance easement requirements beside the west channel, as required in the City of Tucson's SMDDFM Section 1.5.1; (DS 10-02.0);
2. Provide a detailed inspection list and basin performance criteria for reference by the Engineer responsible for annual and as-needed maintenance inspections of the basins and drainageway (SMDDFM, Sections 1.5.2 & 2.3.1.6 C);
3. Please reference and provide a copy of the approved drainage report for the North Tucson Business Center Final Plat - Book 41 Page 90 (SMDDFM, Sec. 2.3.1.2 D);
4. Specify the name, address, and telephone number of the person(s), firm(s), agency or agencies responsible for the ownership, operation, scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and liability of drainage improvements described in the report (SMDDFM, Sec. 2.3.1.2 E);
5. Provide a topographic map at a scale of 1" = 200' or larger, depicting the offsite watershed affecting this project. The information contained in figure 5 (Book 56 Page 60) could not be found on the referenced plat (SMDDFM, Sec. 2.3.1.3 A 2 & 3);
6. The site (Development) plan accompanying the report should include retention/detention basin details, including basin and channel cross-sections and outlet weir details fully labeled and dimensioned with elevations noted. Include locations and sizes of maintenance access ramps (SMDDFM, Sec. 2.3.1.6 A 4 a & b);
7. Include certification that the proposed drainage plan, once properly constructed, will adhere to Local, State and Federal Floodplain Regulations (SMDDFM, Sec. 2.3.1.7 B);
8. Flowage easements and/or drainage easements are to be dedicated whenever new developments are located within a regulatory floodplain or erosion hazard zone (SMDDFM, Sec. 3.4, paragraph 6);
9. The finished floor elevation recommendation found in the text does not reflect that which is depicted on the Development Plan - please address this discrepancy.
10. Percolation test results are required to be submitted with the drainage report, demonstrating sufficient infiltration rates. Test procedures should be performed in accordance with the recommended procedures of the Pima County Department of Transportation - Flood/Control District;
11. Please address erosion protection at the west basin outlet.

LANDSCAPE PLAN:

1. Demonstrate water harvesting in landscape areas to the maximum extent reasonably possible, per Land Use Code, Section 3.7.4, and SMDDFM, Sec. 14.2.10.

Please provide a revised Drainage Report with percolation test results, Development Plan and Landscape Plan.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189 or Dwillia1@ci.tucson.az.us.

Doug Williams
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
03/25/2003 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


Telephone: 520-884-3879
Fax: 520-770-2002
WR#103063 March 26, 2003


Mr. John A. Evans, P.E.
John A. Evans & Associates
9180 E. Placita Senna
Tucson, AZ 85749

Dear Mr. Evans:

SUBJECT: Southwest Ambulances Facility
D03-0006

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated February 25, 2003. It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development.

Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:

Gilbert Bravo
Distribution Services – WI101
Tucson Electric Power Company
P. O. Box 711
Tucson, AZ 85702

Please call me at (520) 884-3879, should you have any questions.

Sincerely,



S. Glynda Rothwell
Right-of-Way Agent
Land Management

sgr
cc: C. Gross, City of Tucson
03/25/2003 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT: D03-0006
Southwest Ambulance Facility
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: March 25, 2003
DUE DATE: March 25, 2003

COMMENTS:

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is February 26, 2004.

2. Add to the location map the following major street names, La Cholla Boulevard, Sweetwater Drive, and Business Center Drive. DS 2-05.2.5.2.1.D.2

3. Add rezoning case number C9-79-37 to the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.1.K

4. This project has been assigned the development plan case number D03-0006. List the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2

5. Add as reference the rezoning case number C9-79-37 to the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2

6. Please revise general note 12 (Proposed Use) to Auto Service and Repair as the Principal Use. The other two uses are ancillary to the principal use. DS 2-05.2.2.B.4

7. Dimension the Commerce Drive curb to property line. Also add an overall building setback dimension from the Commerce Drive property line to the front of the proposed building and from the River Park Drive property line to the sides. In addition if River Park Drive must be developed with curbs, sidewalks, and pavement, please dimension the future curb to property line. DS 2-05.2.3.C and DS 2-05.2.4.I

8. Indicate the zoning classifications adjacent to this site and across the streets. The zoning classifications are as follows, to the north and across the commerce Drive street is I-1, across River Park Drive and adjacent to the west the zoning classification is R-1. DS 2-05.2.4.B

9. Dimension the width of the landing behind the two access ramps next to the handicap parking spaces. The minimum width must be four feet. The pedestrian refuge area along the side of the building next to the 6 vehicle parking spaces must be constructed of concrete. The sidewalk must also be handicap accessible. Revise as required. DS 2-05.2.4.K and DS 2-08.4.1.C

10. Please dimension the proposed building in order to verify the proposed building area. In addition clarify if the structure of some kind is proposed next to the six parking spaces along the south side of the building. If a structure is proposed indicate what the structure will be and the building size. DS 2-05.2.4.M and .N

11. This project must be provided with two (2) 12 feet wide by 35 feet long loading spaces. Show the locations of the loading spaces, label, and dimension. Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading spaces. DS 2-05.2.4.O

12. The parking calculation is based on the principle use of the site. The principal use has been identified as Automotive Service and Repair DD "34". The parking is based as follows. Motor Vehicle: SB. Nine (9) spaces per bay for the first two (2) bays provided. Five (5) spaces per bay for each additional bay provided up to and including four (4) bays. Two (2) spaces per bay for each additional bay provided over four (4) bays. Bicycle: Four (4) percent - all Class 2. The parking calculation provided on the plan states parking at 1/200 for the gross floor area of 20000 square feet. Revise as required. Based on parking requirement for this use 30 vehicle parking spaces would be required. Additional parking may be provided if needed or wanted but the correct parking calculation ratio must be used to be consistent with the development criteria of the principal use.

13. Bicycle parking facilities are required for this project. The required bicycle parking spaces is based on four (4) percent of the provided vehicle parking spaces, all class two facilities. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided.

14. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. Also, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and those minimal location requirements can be met. DS 2-05.2.4.V and .W

15. Provide a separate LUC data text block that provides the information related to the proposed use and the development criteria. The criteria that must be included are required and provided vehicle/ bicycle parking including handicap parking and loading spaces. Allowed and proposed building heights, floor area ratios, building setbacks based on the perimeter yard indicator DD and street building setbacks based LUC 3.2.6.5.

16. See landscape reviewer comment regarding landscape borders, screening, and NPPO requirements. Also for consistency ensure that all changes to the development plan are coordinated with the landscape plan and NNPO sheets and are made accordingly.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D030006dp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development and landscape plans.

201 N. STONE AVENUE - TUCSON, AZ 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 * FAX (520) 879-8010
www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd
03/25/2003 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development PLan to City Planning. Signed and dated mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to the assignment of addresses.

2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.
03/25/2003 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: March 24, 2003

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0006 Southwest Ambulance Facility Development Plan


CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


The wall along the west side of the project on River Park Drive and fronting the future Santa Cruz River Park should be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall should incorporate one of the following decorative materials: tile, stone, brick, textured brick/block, a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, wrought iron, or a combination of the above materials.
03/25/2003 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D03-0006 Southwest Ambulance Facility 3/17/03

() Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-79-37

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: March 25, 2003

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
( ) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
( ) No Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 3/17/03
Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments
Southwest Ambulance Facility, D03-0006


1. The Santa Cruz Area Plan calls out that all existing land uses should be interrelated with the linear park system. It is encouraged that the subject site redesigns the 5’ chain link fence w/redwood slats to be more visually interesting and compatible to the Santa Cruz linear park system that it faces.
03/25/2003 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No objection,

Craig, important information regarding this development: Real Estate received a request for the vacation and sale of River Park Drive to the south of this development. Parks and Recreation objected to this request as they have plans to develop this r/w into a parking lot for the Santa Cruz River Park. River Park Drive will remain r/w until Parks directs Transportation to convert it to Parks property. Any requirement for the developer to make improvements to this r/w would appear to be without merit.
03/25/2003 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP.


D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us