Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0005
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/19/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/20/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 2/20/03. |
| 02/26/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D03-0005 INTERTECH ARCHITECTURAL INTERORS,INC. ASSISTANCE LEAGUE EXPANSION |
| 02/26/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: February 24, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0005 Assistance League Expansion: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed and has no comments. |
| 03/10/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Telephone: 520-884-3879 Fax: 520-770-2002 WR#102355 March 7, 2003 Mr. Steve Shields Intertech Architectural Interiors, Inc. 6089 E. Grant Road Tucson, AZ 85712 Dear Mr. Shields: SUBJECT: Assistance League of Tucson, Inc. D03-0005 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Development Plan dated February 18, 2003. It appears that there are no conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development, with the exception of an overhang of existing overhead wires along the project’s north boundary and Fairmont Street. Mrs. Patricia Smith, Right of Way Agent for TEP, will be requesting an Easement to cover these facilities from the owner of the property in the near future. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Ron Grant Distribution Services – DS101 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 884-3879, should you have any questions. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgr cc: C. Gross, City of Tucson |
| 03/13/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0005 Assistance League Expansion 03/10/03 ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-01-03, C10-87-98 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant Alvernon GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: March 18, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: Jbeall 791-4505 DATE: 3-7-03 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments Assistance League Expansion, D03-0005 The applicant’s request to rezone the property located at the southwest corner of Fairmont Street/Alvernon Way that was approved by Mayor and Council is subject to meeting certain rezoning conditions. The development plan does not appear to show that the existing access driveway at Fairmont Street will have a “Right Turn Only” sign. Please show on the development plan that there will be a “Right Turn Only” sign posted for the existing access driveway at Fairmont Street. [Rezoning Condition no. 4] Please provide a note to the General Notes section which reads “that the proposed development will have no drive-through service, all primary commercial activities limited to within an enclosed building, and no direct access to Fairmont”. [Rezoning Condition no. 1.b, d, and e] Defer to Traffic Engineering for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 1.e, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Defer to Floodplain Engineering for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 6, 7, 8, and 9. Defer to Tucson Police Department for comments and compliance with the following rezoning condition: 18. Provide color palette that shows building structure colors are to be earth tone, and provide more architectural detail to the west, north and east facades. [Rezoning Condition no. 12 and 14] Provide detail or elevations and color palette showing that signs will be compatible with the landscape plan and reflect the architectural style or theme of the proposed building. [Rezoning Condition no. 13] Show on the development plan that all new dumpsters and loading spaces are placed at least 50’ from residentially zoned or developed property. [Rezoning Condition no. 16] Provide a note to the General Notes section that reads, “Limit primary activities on site to 7:00 AM to 10:00 AM.” [Rezoning Condition no. 11] Although the development plan provides a detail of the screen wall, graffiti-resistant materials need to be identified on the development plan. [Rezoning Condition no. 10] The development plan does not appear to indicate all existing perimeter walls. Please indicate on the development all existing perimeter walls. Also provide the height dimension for all perimeter walls, existing and proposed, with the masonry wall along the south property line to be at least 6’. [Rezoning Condition no. 1.c] Show on development plan that the masonry walls on the west property line are designed to permit the flow of storm water. [Rezoning Condition no. 8] The development plan does not show that all on-site lighting shall be no higher than 16’. Provide a typical depicting site lighting design and provide a note to the General Notes section, which reads, “All outdoor lighting shall be directed down and away from residential parcels and public roadways and be maximum of sixteen (16) feet high measured to the light source.” [Rezoning Condition no. 15] It appears that there is a duplication of Rezoning Conditions [13 and 14] listed on the development plan, sheet 1 of 7. Please correct, and show the correct numbering for the required Rezoning Conditions. Defer to Development Services for comments and compliance of the following rezoning condition: 17. |
| 03/13/2003 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Case Number: D03-0005 Project Name: Assistance League Expansion Estimated Traffic Generation: 316 trips |
| 03/17/2003 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-005 Assistance League Expansion Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: March 17, 2003 DUE DATE: March 18, 2003 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is February 18, 2004. LUC 5.3.8.2 2. Place the development plan number (D03-005) on each sheet of development plan and landscape plan, in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. Label all zoning classifications within and adjacent to the project site, with zoning boundaries clearly identified. DS 2-05.2.4.B 4. The proposed retail-general merchandise sales use in the C-2 zone is subject to LUC Section 3.5.9.2.C, which states that fuel dispensing systems are limited to a maximum of twelve. Please add a general note detailing this restriction. LUC 2.5.3.2.B.2 5. Compact parking spaces are only allowed within the Downtown Redevelopment District. Please revise the drawing and parking calculations by removing all references to compact parking. Revise the drawing on sheet 2 of 7, and the detail typical drawing on sheet 3 of 7 to indicate that these spaces meet the minimum required dimensions of 8-1/2 feet by 18 feet. LUC 3.3.7.2.C.1 DS 2-05.2.4.P 6. Revise the parking space count number for the row of spaces located to the northwest of the existing building to read 4 instead of 6. Also, the parking calcs indicate that 117 spaces are provided, but only 116 are shown on the drawing. Please revise. DS 2-05.2.4.P 7. The rezoning conditions listed on the d.p are not numbered correctly because rezoning condition #13 is listed twice (as #13 and #14). There are only a total of twenty rezoning conditions. Please revise/renumber to be correct. DS 2-05.2.4.U 8. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 4, which requires that the existing access drive to Fairmount Avenue have a "right turn only" sign. Show the location of the signage on the drawing. Also, demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 1.c which requires a minimum 6-foot masonry wall along the south property line by showing the wall location on the plan drawing. her easements. Any proposed easements must be labeled, dimensioned, recorded, and recordation information must be added to the plan prior to approval DS 2-05.2.4.U 9. Wheelstops must be provided in all parking spaces which abut pedestrian sidewalks (unless the sidewalks are a minimum 6-1/2 feet in width). Dimension the existing sidewalk and parking spaces (width and length) located along the north side of the existing building. If the sidewalk is less than 6-1/2 feet in width, wheelstops curbing must be placed in these spaces to prevent vehicles from overhanging the sidewalk area. The Assessor's tax parcel numbers (122-18-166A and 1222-18-171) are placed directly over other information, making it difficult to read. Because a lot combination is required (see comment 10 below) prior to development plan approval, these tax numbers and the interior lot lines may be removed from the drawing. DS 3-05 10. Buildings may not be built over lot lines. Because the project area is made up of nine separate parcels, a lot combination is required prior to the approval of the development plan. Please provide the following documentation to the Zoning Review Section for review: a signed, notarized and recorded covenant, and an approved Pima County Tax Combination Form. 11. Add sight visibility triangles at the intersection of Alvernon Way and Fairmount Avenue, and at the intersection of the existing access drive to Fairmount Avenue. DS 2-05.2.4.R 12. Label the dimensions of all structures on the d.p. Provide the height of the existing building in the calculations. DS 2-05.2.4.N 13. Dimension the PAAL immediately to the west of the existing building. Both PAALs to the west of the existing building do not meet the minimum required width of 24 feet. These PAALs may not be one-way because of requirements for maneuverability of trucks into the existing loading spaces. Please revise. 14. Indicate the location and type any new and existing freestanding signs, including billboards. DS 2-05.2.4.W 15. The on-site pedestrian circulation system must be dimensioned on the drawing. Continuous and direct access between the buildings and the pedestrian sidewalk located along the adjacent street (Fairmount Avenue) must be provided per DS 2-08. DS 2-05.2.4.K DS 2-08.4.1.A 16. Board of Adjustment variance case number C10-87-98 is listed in the title block. Add a general note stating this variance case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 17. Dimension the width of the access drive to Fairmount Ave. It does not appear to meet minimum requirement of 24 feet. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 18. Label future curb location and future SVT's along Alvernon Way on sheet 2 of 7. DS 2-05.2.4.D.2 DS 2-05.2.4.R 19. All requested changes must be made to the development plan and landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 03/17/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 March 12, 2003 TO: Steve Shields, Intertech Architectural Interiors, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions SUBJECT: Assistance League of Tucson Expansion Development Plan - 1st Submittal D03-005 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection rates. 3. Add the Development Plan case number, D03-005, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 4. In General Note #’14 also include the number of existing fixture units. Based on the total amount of fixture units will determine if a sewer service agreement will be required. 5. Correct the spelling in General Note #’12. 6. Pages 4-7 were not submitted for our review. Please submit all pages. Be advised, when we review the 2nd submittal additional comments and or corrections may be forthcoming. 7. Show and label the existing public sewers adjacent to this property (G-219, 8" on Fairmount Avenue and I-82-09, 8" on Alvernon Way). 8. Show the method and location of connection to the public sewer (label appropriately as public or private, new or existing and the size of the sewer). 9. We will require a Revised Development Plan. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact Debbie Ketchem at 740-6404. Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions SR/DK/dk Copy: Project |
| 03/17/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO : CITY PLANNING FROM : KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT : D03-0005 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE EXPANSION/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE : March 14, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/ addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct suffixes of Fairmount to Street on sheet 2. Correct spelling of Fairmount Street on Location Map on sheets 1 & 2. Correct Legal Description in Title Block on sheets 1-3 and in sub-section titled Legal Description on sheet 1. Delete lots 4, 5 & 11 and add Block 9. When the development plan is approved do you want the new building to be assigned its own address? |
| 03/18/2003 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please submit the following to the Real Estate Division: legal description with sketch and a title report dated within 30 days for the right of way dedication. Real Estate Division Attn: Jim Stoyanoff Public Works Building 201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 03/19/2003 | JIM TATE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Craig Gross; CDRC Coordinator DATE: March 18, 2003 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Assistance League Expansion Development Plan. The activity number is D03-0005. SUMMARY: The Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on February 20, 2003. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan, the Landscape Plan, or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DP, DR, LP The next submittal should address the following items: GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. IBC Chapter 36, Section 9. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 3. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in IBC Chapter 36 Section13.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 4. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Loren Makus, 791-4251 for submittal requirements. 5. A Flood Use Permit is required prior to Grading Plan approval. Rezoning condition 9 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3 must be included on the Development Plan. 2. If a registered professional prepared the plans, provide the applicable registration number along with the seal and signature of the professional. DS 2-05.2.2.A.2 3. For land the slopes less than approximately one percent, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one foot. DS 2-05.2.3.E.1 4. Show the contour interval by the north arrow and scale. DS 2-05.2.1.H 5. Per rezoning condition 2, dedication of right-of-way is required prior to Development Plan approval. 6. Label and dimension from street center lines to all existing and proposed curbs and sidewalks. The proposed sidewalk on Fairmount must be 4 ft. wide and located 3 ft. from back of curb. Dimension the width of the existing sidewalk on Alvernon. DS 3-01.3.3.B.1 DS 3-01.4.1.A DS 2-05.2.4.D.2 7. Dimension and label the existing right-of-way on Fairmount. DS 2-05.2.3.C 8. For the detention basin, show the ponding limits, top elevation, and bottom elevation. DS 2-05.2.4.H.1 9. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10 yr. event. Place a note on the plan stating that all roof downspouts will be routed under any adjacent sidewalk. Provide appropriate scuppers to drain landscape areas under sidewalks. DS 2-08.4.1.E 10. The 100-yr. peak flow in Alvernon is regulatory flow. Show the 100-yr. flood limits and water surface elevations on the plan. 100-yr floodplain limits which are entirely contained within a street section shall be labeled as such on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.6 Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 2.3.1.4.4 11. All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project shall be indicated on the drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.B 12. Provide proposed ground elevations at several locations for reference to future grading and site drainage. Provide sufficient elevations to determine whether or not "differential grading" applies to the project (see General Comment 3). DS 2-05.2.4.H.4 13. The existing solid waste enclosure must be brought up to development standards. Please note and show this on the plan. See DS 6-01. 14. Show sight visibility triangles: exit on to Fairmount (near side = 185', no far side), corner of Fairmount and Alvernon (along Fairmount = 165', along Alvernon = 125'). Show future sight visibility triangles for all locations on Alvernon. DS 3-01.5 15. The minimum width of a PAAL is 24 ft. The plan shows a PAAL width of 22'-9" at the southwest corner parking area. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 16. The exit on to Fairmount must have a right turn only sign. Rezoning condition 4 17. Show estimated cut and fill quantities on the plan. 18. Show proposed finish floor elevation of the new structure. Finish floor elevation of structures must be 1 ft. above any adjacent basin WSEL. Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, SDRM, 3.5.1.10 19. Percolation tests are required in conjunction with the design of each surface storage facility which utilizes infiltration as a method of basin drainage. Provide. SDRM, 3.5.1.5 20. Specify basin slope on the plan. Security barriers must be provided at the top of all basin slopes steeper than 4:1 where water depths exceed two feet. SDRM, 3.6.2 21. Show basin inlet wall opening length and height on the plan. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.A.4.a 22. Specify the scupper size on the plan. SMDDFM, 2.3.1.6.A.4.a 23. Rezoning condition 7 specifies that roof and parking lot drainage be directed into landscape areas. The Landscape plan shows 8 landscape islands in the parking area. Parking area drainage must be directed into these areas. The landscape area adjacent to the building must have roof and/or parking area drainage directed there. The landscape area northeast of the existing building must have roof/parking area drainage directed there. Show appropriate curb openings and drainage arrows. DRAINAGE REPORT 1. The Development Plan shows a basin inlet structure invert of 2474.2. The Drainage Report specifies that the 100-yr. peak WSEL is 2475.03. Is it intended that the 100 yr. peak basin ponding limits include the parking lot? Determine ponding limits and verify inlet invert elevation. 2. The drainage report specifies a 100 yr. peak flow for Alvernon of 1242 cfs. Where did this number come from? Node GG-N0050 with a Q-100 of 1242 cfs is approximately 1 ½ block south of the proposed project. The previous study by Jeff Stanley is north of the project and specifies a flow of 1516 cfs. Justify the flow. LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. Water harvesting techniques must be used. Rezoning condition 7. 2. All sight visibility triangles shown on the Development Plan must be shown correctly on the Landscape Plan. (See comment 14 on the Development Plan). James C. Tate, P.E. Civil Engineer |
| 03/20/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise General Note 1 on sheet 4 to refer to the proper sheet where conditions of rezoning are listed. 2) Provide additional information regarding the proposed slope and depth of the basin along Fairmount Avenue. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 3) Provide calculations for percentage of ground cover for the street landscape borders. The fifty percent coverage requirement applies also when the width of the border exceeds ten feet. DS 2-06.3.4.C.2 "In situations where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten (10) foot requirement, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the fifty (50) percent vegetative coverage requirement, Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line" 4) Note the height of the existing walls along Fairmount Avenue. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 5) Revise keynotes 18 and 19 on sheet 2 and or the corresponding details to reference the appropriate note or detail. 6) Revise the plans as necessary to clarify how the project complies with the conditions of rezoning. (7 & 10) 7) Revise the Native Plant Inventory to identify the locations of individual protected plants. DS 2-15.3.1.A.3 8) Revise the NPPO plant mitigation summary to comply with LUC 3.8.6-I. The replacement ratio of 2 replacement plants for each one removed applies. 9) Verify if the scale is noted correctly on sheet 5. DS 2-15.3.1.A.3 10) The certified arborist information should include the certifying organization and any registration numbers. Resubmittal of the landscape plan, development plan, and native plant preservation plan is required. |
| 03/25/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends approval of this development plan. The consultant should note that Rezoning conditions 13 and 14 are repeated on sheet 1. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |