Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0002
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/27/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 July 18, 2003 TO: Bruce Paton, Rick Engineering THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Eastpointe Commercial Center, Lots 1-5 Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D03-0002 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Identify the location of the HCS for each building and lot. 2. What does keynote #48 on sheet two represent? 3. Keynote #11. Modify to include "private" in the description. 4. The are four symbols labeled 1-4 that do not correspond to the keynotes. Correct appropriately. 5. Add to General Notes #13. All HCS are private. 6. We did not receive the documentation as stated in your response letter of June 24, 2003 in regards to the maintenance of the proposed HCS recorded on Section 1.ii of the CC&R’s. Please provide. 7. Please explain how the wastewater management vehicles will travel from manhole #2 to manhole #3. 8. Please contact me to schedule a meeting to discuss the issue of access to public manholes and clarification of the public and private sewers. 9. We will require a complete set of the revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of a development plan or subdivision plat. The review fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third submittal. Please include a $78.00 check for the wastewater review fees (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) with the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If other sheets are revised in such a manner that the sewer design is impacted, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6585. Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Division (Wastewater) SR/SR/dk Copy: Project |
| 06/27/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D03-0002 EASTPOINTE COMMERCIAL CENTER / REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: June 26, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Approval of Development Plan labeling Lot 5A and 5B is contingent on receival of Recorded Deed for Lot Split. NOTE: 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 07/02/2003 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please submit a legal description for the area of the 1' no-access easement to be abandoned. Also, a legal description for a new 1' no-access easement over the area that will not be used as created by the plat 52/100. |
| 07/03/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D03-0002 Eastpointe Commercial Center 07/02/03 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( X ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: S99-036, C9-83-09, C10-99-55 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Houghton Road Scenic Corridor COMMENTS DUE BY: July 8, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 7/1/03 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments Eastpointe Commercial Center, D03-0002 The applicant's request to develop the property located at the northwest corner of Houghton Road and Broadway Boulevard is subject to meeting certain rezoning and board of adjustment conditions. 15. The applicant's comments appear to address the issue that the Houghton Greenway will only be built on the east side of Houghton Road, hence no need for a trail system. However, the applicant still needs to coordinate with Glenn Hicks at Parks and Recreation as to any possible contributing in lieu fees, as Houghton Greenway is a community trail system that benefits both sides of Houghton Road. Please provide documentation that this Houghton Greenway issue has been coordinated with Glenn Hick at Parks and Recreation. |
| 07/08/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: East Pointe Commercial Center Development Plan D03-0002 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 11 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. See following note. 2. The sidewalk may not have to be shown, but the face of curb is necessary to locate the future sight visibility triangles. 3. Please provide adjacent property grades for review in accordance with in 2000 IBC section 13 concerning fills. A letter of justification and mitigation for permission from the Development Services Department to place fill in excess of two feet as outlined in the appendix of the International Building Code, Chapter 36 Excavation and Grading, Section 13. The rough grading plan in which you cite and have agreed that more than 180 days have passed is now expired. 4. A copy of the previously approved DP was not included in this submittal. 5. Correct the width of Houghton Road cross section on sheet 3. 6. The inlet control structure (Detail F, sht. 3) shows the property line within the structure. Please correct. Drainage Report: 1. A comment letter was not included with this second submittal. The drainage report was not reviewed. 2. There are three locations on both the Drainage map and Development plan and only two calculations for the sidewalk scuppers. Please revise. 3. Considering the time of concentration, please revise the Qout amount for the discharge into the existing 24" srp. 4. The discharge velocity from the 24" srp warrants scour protection. Please address. 5. Please provide a copy of the previously approved drainage report and the development plan. 6. Please show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report. 7. A drainage area in the SW area of bldg. 6 and a portion of the drive through lane for that bldg. has not been accounted for. Please revise all affected portion of the drainage report and the drainage map. 8. Include the s/w outlet scupper calculations for det/ret basin D2. 9. When resubmitting drainage report, please use a larger binder. The report is coming apart. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul Machado Senior Engineering Associate, |
| 07/10/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 07/14/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The variances granted and conditions imposed in Board of Adjustment Case C10-99-55 are no longer applicable to this project. The case is now expired. Revise all plans to remove erroneous information. 2) Conditions of rezoning apply to this project. Additional information is required regarding compliance as follows: [1.C. A thirty-foot landscape buffer is required along Houghton Road. This buffer is also required per LUC 3.7.5.2.A. Revise the plans to include a 30' wide natural buffer on site. 1.F. This condition requires fencing for buffer areas. Revise the NPPO to show natural areas which will be fenced. 1.N. Requires that trees along the west property line be min. 24" box size. Revise the plans to include larger trees for the west buffer. 7. This condition requires grafitti resistant walls. Revise the plans to clarify compliance.] 3) Sheet N1 includes language regarding the Hidden Hills Wash study area. Locate the Hidden Hills Wash on the plans, if applicable. If not, revise the notes. 4) Revise the Native Plant Inventory to clarify the type of size measurements taken or use some other means to distinguish trees from shrubs. Previous plans for the site appeared to include a greater number of acacia constricta shrubs. |
| 07/17/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: July 16, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0002 Eastpointe Commercial Center Development Plan Resubmittal CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed the plans for the Eastpointe Commercial Center to be located at the northwest corner of Houghton Road and Broadway, and we have the following comments: Development plan shall state: The developer/owner shall provide a contribution to the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department for the construction of the Houghton Road Greenway. The developer/owner's contribution shall be calculated at $44.00 per linear foot(estimated cost per linear foot of contructing the Greenway) times the length(in linear feet) of the petitioner's property frontage on Houghton Road. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. |
| 07/17/2003 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera FOR: Patricia Gehlen Senior Planner Principal Planner PROJECT: D03-002 Eastpointe Commercial Center, Lots 1-5 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: July 15, 2003 DUE DATE: July 8, 2003 COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 13, 2004. 2. I acknowledge the response to the previous comment. I have left this comment as reference only. (Previous Comment: Add the docket and page numbers for all proposed easements or portions of easements that are to be vacated. The docket and page numbers must be on the Mylar copy that will be submitted for stamps and signatures.) DS 2-05.2.2.3.B 3 The Financial Service Use is restricted to three (3) drive-through lanes of which one is restricted to ATM service only. Label the lane that is proposed for ATM use. Each drive-through window including the ATM must be provided with a drive-through lane that provides a minimum of four (4) stacking spaces. The Financial Services Use is proposed with two (2) drive-through lanes and one (1) ATM drive-through lane. Each drive-through must be provided with a lane, which accommodates four (4) stacking spaces. Only two lanes have been provided. In addition the loading space is within a PAAL area or within the area that would be required for the third drive-through lane. Revise as required. (Previous Comment: Dimension all PAAL widths, all drive-through lanes, as well as any proposed escape lanes within the drive-through service area. A. Indicate the direction of vehicular travel through the drive-through lanes. B. The minimum stacking capacity for one drive-through lane is six spaces 18 feet long each. C. Demonstrate the required stacking capacity for the restaurant on pad 2. D. Indicate the number of proposed drive-through lanes for the bank. Demonstrate the required stacking capacity for each drive-through lane for the bank. Depict the drive-through lanes and escape lanes. G. The loading zone for the bank use may not be placed within a PAAL. Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading zone when the drive-through lanes are occupied. Will the loading zone be provided with a separate PAAL to eliminate access problems? Future comments may be forthcoming on this issue based on subsequent plan submittals.) DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 and DS 2-05.2.4.0 4. As noted in the previous comment this site is subject to compliance of the requirements of the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. As of this review date an application for the Scenic Corridor review has not been submitted nor did this submittal packet include scenic corridor criteria. This development plan cannot be approved until the Scenic Corridor has been submitted for review and approved. (Previous Comment: This site is subject to the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone Criteria. A separate application and fee for the Scenic Corridor review is required. A cursory review of the plan for Scenic compliance was done but only for building setbacks and view corridors. The building setbacks for buildings four (4), five (5), and six (6) have not been met and the view corridors were not depicted.) The following notes must be added. These notes are relevant to the Scenic Corridor. Additional comments may be required to be listed based on the Scenic Corridor review. See LUC section 2.8.2 and 3.5.7.2. (Call me regarding the SCZ application and additional requirements that must be addressed.) 1. Provide three (3) copies of the tentative plat for SCZ review with the following items added. 2. Include in 30 foot buffer label the notation "30 foot undisturbed natural buffer to be preserved and maintained in it's natural state". 3. Add and annotate the 400-foot SCZ corridor boundary on the development plan. 4. Please add the following notes to the tentative plat. a.) Add the view corridor calculations. b.) Individual SCZ case not required for each lot, but site plans, elevations, and colors must be submitted for each lot for review of compliance to Scenic Corridor Zone case number SCZ-03- (assigned case number still pending) for height, colors, and setbacks. c.) Maximum height of structures will be 1/3 the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way of Houghton Road right-of-way line, not to exceed 30 feet. d.) No grading beyond that is necessary for siting of buildings, driveway entrances, private yards, and structural improvements. All existing vegetation with a caliper of 4 inches or greater and all saguaro cacti must be preserved or relocated on the site. e.) Existing Drainageways are to be maintained in their natural state. f.) All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along Houghton Road will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, if area is revegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D g.) Building or structure surfaces, which are visible from Houghton Road will have colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape. Colors are as follows: (list approved colors from SCZ-03-____ case.) h.) Fencing and freestanding walls facing Houghton Road will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements. i.) All areas between the Houghton Road MS & R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be re-vegetated with native vegetation. j.) All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from Houghton Road and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be revegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. k.) Exposed cut and fill slopes shall be no greater than one (1) foot rise or fall over a three (3) foot length. 5. Add an overall distance dimension from the west property line to the closest refuse enclosure and loading space on lot 1 and 3. 6. The information regarding the lot slit must be Added as a general note or keynote. Include the date of approval, lot split application case number, and the lot that was split. If CC&R's are proposed for the maintenance of retention basins, pavement, landscaping etc please provide a copy of the document for review and insure that the new lot is included in the title description. 7. Per a conversation Wayne Bogdan and Russlyn Wells the board of adjustment variances for the landscaping have expired. Full landscape and scenic corridor criteria apply. Additional comments will be forthcoming based on the Scenic Corridor and revised Development Plan submittal packets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D03002dp2.doc |