Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CDRC - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D03-0001
Review Name: CDRC - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW | Completed | |
| 01/06/2003 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS APPROVED 1/6/03. |
| 01/08/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 February 19, 2003 TO: James R. Watson, James R. Watson, Architect, PLC THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Administrative Offices for Arizona Lithographers Development Plan - 1st Submittal D03-0001 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on the preliminary sewer layout as shown on the referenced development plan, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. Add the development plan case number, D03-0001, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 4. Revise General Note 11 to read: ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. 5. Use different spacing in the linetype (or a different linetype) for the sanitary sewers, and the storm sewers, so that they can easily be told apart. Although these lines are marked with "S" to denote a sanitary sewer and "SS" to denote a storm sewer, this doesn’t provide enough contrast for these lines to be easily told apart. 6. Use different symbols for the sanitary sewer manholes, and the storm sewer manholes, so that they can easily be told apart. 7. Revise the legend to accurate show and describe the lines and symbols used for the sanitary sewers, storm sewers, sanitary sewer manholes, and storm sewer manholes. 8. Show the invert elevations of the manhole referenced in Keynote 22, to show that the proposed private sewer line can be connected to existing sewer line D-87-50 without contacting existing sewer line G-65-19. 9. PCWWM will need vehicular access to the existing manhole referenced in Keynote 22, and PCWWM’s vehicles cannot negotiate vertical curbing without damaging the curbing and/or the vehicle. Provide a depressed area of curbing with removable bollards (or other suitable features) along the edge of the parking lot to provide this access. 10. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 01/08/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D03-0001 JAMES R WATSON ADMINISTRATION OFFICES |
| 01/08/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO : CITY PLANNING FROM : KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT : D03-0001 ADMINISTRATION OFFICES / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE : January 6, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/ addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to the assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 01/13/2003 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ENGINEERING | Denied | SUBJECT: Administrative Offices Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D03-0001 SUMMARY: The development plan sheets and drainage report were received by Development Services Department Engineering on January 6, 2003. Development Services Department Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The drainage report was reviewed for development plan purposes only. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2-05.2.4.H.2: In conjunction with a revised drainage report, drainage information will be indicated on the development plan. Specifically, indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow for offsite flows entering south boundary from LOT 17 and PARK LANE. Show capacity for the rock lined drainage swale along south side of proposed building. (See also comment items 2) 4) and 5) below.) 2) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.4.H.7: Discuss in drainage report and indicate types of acceptance points and runoff discharge points on sheet 8. (See comment item 4) below.) 3) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.4.H.4: On sheet 2 and 7, some locations for depressed curb openings do not match sheet 8; assure locations match on all sheets. On sheet 8, assure low point spot elevations are labeled at each opening. 4) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.4.H.5: Provide size and spacing for wall openings for Keynote 14 on sheet 2. 5) DS Sec.10-01.V.2.5: In drainage report, discuss Easement Note J, shown on sheet 2 of Development Plan, regarding whether there exists a Floodprone Area, and if so, provide Q100, limits, and WSEL's for this area. (See the Detention Retention Manual and also the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management.) 6) Regarding basin discussion in DESIGN CONDITIONS section of drainage report, stormwater retention will not be required for this site. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS 7) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2-05.2.1.E: Provide an index on the cover sheet for titles of all 9 sheets of Development Plan. Add the title "DEVELOPMENT PLAN" to all sheets. Also, on sheet 8, the title at the lower end of sheet shall read: "GRADING & PAVING - HYDROLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN." 8) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.1.G&K: Place title block information (with annexation number, Pad zone, case number, and property address) in the lower right corner of the sheet next to the legal description. 9) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.1.H: On sheet 8, place the contour interval and scale next to the north arrow. 10) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.1.J: On sheet 8, label all lines or add dotted line and dashed lines to legend. 11) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.3.A: On a plan view, show location of portion of Bonita Avenue and tie basis for bearing to property. 12) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Clarify keynote "T" on sheet 2. 13) D.S.Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Provide in plan view or section, the existing public right-of-way for Fresno Street labeling name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks. 14) On sheet 8, show the location of proposed ground cover per GENERAL NOTE 26 on sheet 1. 15) On sheet 8, check proposed finished paved spot elevation at northwest corner of proposed parking area. Given the outlet elevation at northeast corner depressed curb opening and the proposed slope grade along the north edge of this parking area, the northwest corner elevation appears too low. 16) On sheet 8, check call-outs for details referencing details on sheet G-2. Specifically, check labels for call-outs 5 and 6 for G-2. 17) D.S.Sec.2-05.3.2.A: Provide a geotechnical report discussing suitability of soils for proposed project. Include recommendations for overexcavation if needed, and recommendations for the proposed prepared subgrade for the pavement section. 18) A separate building permit submittal and review for the 6-foot CMU wall will be needed. Resubmittal is required. Submit two copies of the following: the soils report, revised drainage report, and revised development plan. The next submittal should address all the above items. Please schedule a meeting to go over your comments. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Section Development Services |
| 01/15/2003 | DAN CASTRO | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ZONING | Approv-Cond | Note the development plan case number D03-0001 in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. |
| 01/17/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: January 16, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project D03-0001 Administration Offices CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Staff has reviewed and has no comments. |
| 01/27/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | LANDSCAPE | Denied | Utility facilities shall be visually screened through undergrounding or appropriate screening. PG XI-31 Rio Nuevo Redevelopment Plan Add appropriate notes to the site plan. An irrigation plan will be required when applying for construction permits. |
| 01/28/2003 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Case Number: D03-0001 Project Name: Administrative Offices Estimated Traffic Generation: 137 trips |
| 01/28/2003 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 01/30/2003 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No objection |
| 01/30/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT: D03-0001 Arizona Lithographers 01/30/2003 Administrative Offices () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Other: Building elevations, color chips, floor plans, NPPO plan. PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT: Río Nuevo Redevelopment Plan Development Area 5, Lot 16 COMMENTS DUE BY: 01/30/2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASKFORCE, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other: Development Site Methane Control Plan, Floor Plans, Sign Plan, Outdoor Lighting Plan, Elevation renderings, perimeter wall details. REVIEWER: María Gayosso DATE: 01/30/2003 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS D03-0001 Arizona Lithographers Administrative Offices NOTE: The Comprehensive Planning Task Force always encourages applicants to contact us to meet and discuss their proposal, prior to the initial submittal. This offer is open. Please contact us at 791-4505 if you have any questions. This Development Plan must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the 1987 Río Nuevo Redevelopment Plan/ Planned Area Development (PAD) and any of its components. Please note that this document is available at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/genplan/srplans.htm To assure that this development is in conformance with the PAD, please address the following: APPROVAL BY THE REDEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR (CITY OF TUCSON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE). Please note that this Development Plan and related construction documents and building specifications must be approved by the Redevelopment Administrator prior to the development of the site. Please submit this Development Plan to Larry Cummings, Economic Development (791-5093) for their review. Following approval by the Redevelopment Administrator, Development Plans must be forwarded to the City for approval. CDRC will then have 30 days to complete its review. Please provide a copy of the written approval by the Economic Development office (PAD Sections III.B.2.b.1 and III.B.2.b.3). If revisions occur and substantial changes are made to this Development Plan, the developer must re-submit the revised Development Plan to the Redevelopment Administrator prior to re-submittal to CDRC for review (PAD Section III.B.2.b.3). DEVELOPMENT SITE METHANE CONTROL PLAN. The PAD area contains two closed Solid Waste Disposal Sites (SWDS). The site that affects this parcel is located on the property to the west. This PAD includes a Master Methane Control Plan (MMCP) that addresses mitigation measures associated with methane generation and migration and methane monitoring and reporting procedures. The applicant must submit a Development Site Methane Control Plan (PAD Sections III.B.4.c, III.B.4.d, III.B.4.d, III.B.4.e), indicating perimeter methane control and/or monitoring to the following agencies: City of Tucson Solid Waste Department Development Services Department Fire Department Comprehensive Planning Task Force State of Arizona Department of Health Services Once the above agencies have reviewed and approved the control plan, please provide a copy of their written approval. FLOOR PLANS. On the floor plans of Sheets A-1 and A-2, please clearly show, label and dimension the area designated for the 5 Class I bicycle parking spaces (PAD Section III.B.2.b.2). SIGN PLAN. Please include in the Development Plan a new sheet, providing a Sign Plan concept, showing the location, size and lighting sources of all signs and other advertising devices. Also, please include the following notes on the Sign Plan: The design of permitted signs shall be architecturally integrated with the building design (PAD Section III.A.3.e). Please include on the Sign Plan details of the proposed signs, demonstrating how the proposed development meets this requirement. No advertising devices shall be permitted which revolve, rotate, move or create the illusion of movement, or have any visible moving, revolving, or rotating surface or parts. No part of an illuminated advertising device light source or any light shall revolve, rotate, move, or create the movement, nor change color, fluctuate or vacillate. No off-premise signage, except for real estate and directional signs, shall be allowed. Window paste-ups or similar temporary signs intended to be read from streets, drives and parking areas shall be prohibited, except that signs advising for sales, special events or other temporary merchandising activities may be displayed with specific approval by the Property Owner’s Association, and the City Building Safety Division (PAD Section III.A.3.e). OUTDOOR LIGHTING PLAN. Please include in the Development Plan a new sheet, providing an Outdoor Lighting Plan for all parking areas, vehicular and pedestrian circulation areas and exterior building lighting to indicate the type, size and height of all lighting structures and fixtures, and illumination specification. Also, please include the following notes on the Lighting Plan: Lights shall not be placed to cause glare or excessive light spillage on neighboring sites and residential neighborhoods (PAD Section III.A.3.d). The design of light fixtures and their structural support shall be architecturally compatible with the surrounding buildings (PAD Section III.A.3.d). Please include on the Lighting Plan details of the outdoor lighting fixtures and supports, demonstrating how the proposed development meets this requirement. DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA. The project is to buffer the existing neighborhoods from the refuse area and the loading zone, which are the higher intensity uses in the site due to their noise impact on surrounding residences (PAD Section I.D.1.j). Given the close proximity to residences, both the refuse area and the loading zone are to be relocated to the south-east side of the building, away and screened from surrounding residential zones or uses. On Sheet D-1, general note 15, please add the following note: “Landscaping, fences and walls or a combination shall be utilized to visually screen and or physically enclose outdoor storage areas, loading docks and ramps, transformers, storage tanks, and other appurtenant items of poor visual quality” (PAD Section III.A.3.c). The loading zone is to be enclosed to meet this requirement. On Sheet D-1, general note 15, please add the following note: “Fencing, walls and other structural barriers are to be designed of similar materials, colors and general style as the primary buildings on the site. Chain-link and wooden fences will not be permitted” (PAD Section III.A.3.c and III.B.2.b.2). Please include an additional sheet to the Development Plan, with dimensioned elevation renderings of perimeter walls, refuse area and loading zone enclosures, indicating the materials and colors used. On Sheet D-1, general note 15, please revise the note related to the actual street perimeter yard (the portion that reads “or 412% of building height”). On the drawing of Sheet D-2, please dimension the setback of the building from the property line along Commerce Park Loop (PAD Section II.A, Development Area 5). On Sheet D-1, general note 15, please add the following note: “Minimum required building setback from existing residential development areas: 20 feet” (PAD Section II.A, Development Area 5). On Sheet D-1, general note 15, please add the following note: “Maximum permitted floor area ratio: 0.6”, and also please provide the floor area calculations demonstrating compliance with this requirement (PAD Section II.A, Development Area 5). On Sheet D-1, general note 15, please add the following note: “Utility facilities shall be visually screened through undergrounding or appropriate screening” (PAD Section III.A.2.c). On Sheet D-1, general note 15, please add the following note: “Development is to avoid long linear vistas and building edges within the development envelope and along streetscape through variation in setbacks” (PAD Section III.A.2.c). On Sheet D-1, general note 15, please add the following note: “No fence or wall shall exceed 6 feet in height” (PAD Section III.A.3.c). On Sheet D-1, general note 15, please add the following note: “All roof and ground-mounted equipment shall be screened (PAD Section III.A.3.c). On Sheet D-1, general note 15, please add the following note: “This development is to meet the requirements specified in the Río Nuevo PAD regarding noise, smoke, glare or heat, odors, vibration, liquids and solid waste, illumination, and fly ash, dust, fumes, vapors, gases, and other forms of air pollution” (PAD Section III.A.3.f). LANDSCAPING. Please include the following notes on Sheet L.1 of the Landscape Plan, under a PAD-4 Requirements title (PAD Section II.A, Development Area 5).: “Minimum landscape requirements: 10% of gross site area excluding up to 5’ width of landscape areas along public rights-of-way”. With this note, please also provide the calculations indicating how this project meets this PAD requirement “Plan.Special screening or buffering: A 6’ high wall and a 5’ wide planting strip buffer on the west property line, where a 5’ high wall does not exist. On the drawing of Sheet L-1, please dimension the width of the landscape buffer along the west property line, demonstrating compliance with this requirement. Parking areas are to incorporate both landscaping and screening to make them visually compatible with their surroundings (PAD Section III.A.3.b), and non-residential land uses should buffer abutting residential development with an effective landscape composition (PAD Section III.A.3.c). Please revise the landscape buffer along the entire west property line to meet these requirements of the PAD. |
| 02/19/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Telephone: 520-884-3879 Fax: 520-770-2002 WR#100236 February 18, 2003 Mr. James R. Watson James R. Watson Architect 5672 E. Kelso Street Tucson, Arizona 85712-2247 Dear Mr. Watson: SUBJECT: Arizona Lithographers Admin. Offices D03-0001 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the Development Plan dated December 23, 2002. This approval is contingent upon the developer being aware of the possibility of conflicts with underground electrical facilities crossing under a portion of the area where a 10’ wall is proposed, as well as overhead electrical facilities existing within areas proposed for landscaping. The developer should work with TEP’s design builder to minimize the possibility of conflicts. In the event any of the facilities require relocation, costs shall be borne by the developer. The enclosed map shows the approximate location of the existing facilities. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Frank Kilpatrick Distribution Services – DS201 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 884-3879, should you have any questions. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgr cc: C. Gross, City of Tucson |