Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CDRC - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D02-0042
Review Name: CDRC - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2003 | GLENN HICKS | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: December 31, 2002 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project D02-0042 Rita 244 Retail Center CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Before staff can approve development plans the owner/developer needs to meet with Parks and Recreation staff to discuss completion of Julian Wash Linear Park and trail as required by rezoning conditions C9-00-23 Rita 224. Please contact Glenn Hicks, 791-4873, ext. 215 or e-mail ghicks1@ci.tucson.az.us to discuss. |
| 01/02/2003 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 01/02/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 January 27, 2003 TO: David Tannous, SBBA, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Rita 244 Retail Center Development Plan - 1st Submittal D02-0042 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number case number, D02-0042, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than the cross reference numbers. 4. All Sheets: Show the 12" sewer lines in the Rita Road and Rita Tech Park Blvd. rights of way as if they are existing. The sewer improvement plans for these sewer lines have been approved. 5. All Sheets: Show the proposed private sewer lines as you expect them to appear after all phases of the project have been completed. Use phase lines to show the phased construction of the private sewer lines. 6. Sheet 1: Show the estimated number of wastewater fixture units for each phase of the development, and the estimated total number of wastewater fixture units that will be served when all phases have been completed, in General Note 20. A Sewer Service Agreement may be required for this project if the total number of wastewater fixture units will exceed 144. 7. Sheet 1: If the owner of record is a trust, please provide the full name of the trust company and the trust number. 8. Sheet 1: Delete General Note 21.B regarding off-site sewers. The sewer improvement plans for the off-site sewers have been received and approved. 9. Sheet 2 - 4: Label the 12" sewer line in the Rita Road right of way with its plan number (G-2001-083), and revise the labels to show that it will be made out of ESVCP, rather than PVC. Also, renumber the manholes in this sewer line to conform with the manhole numbers shown on the approved sewer improvement plans for this sewer line. 10. Sheets 3 & 4: Show the proposed rim and invert elevations of the private manholes 11. Sheets 3 & 4: Show the length, size, and slope of the private sewer lines that will be built between the public sewer system, and the proposed private manholes. 12. Sheet 5: Label the 12" sewer line in the Rita Tech Park Blvd. right of way with its plan number (G-2001-118), and revise the labels to show that it will be made out of ESVCP, rather than PVC. Also, renumber the manholes in this sewer line to conform with the manhole numbers shown on the approved sewer improvement plans for this sewer line. 13. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 01/06/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | LANDSCAPE | Denied | Revise the landscape plans to coordinate with the revised Native Plant Preservation Plan. Provide revised mitigation tables and revise the plant list and include quantities transplants amd mitigation plantings as necessary. DS 2-15.3.4.B Revise Sec. 3.0 on pg. 2 of the NPPO report to eliminate the sentence which refers to the lift station. It is assumed that this information is not relevant to this project. Revise the landscape and development plans to conform to LUC Table 3.7.2-I, which requires six-foot high walls for storage facilities located adjacent to residentially zoned properties; screening for refuse storage and loading areas. Clearly identify any of the specific uses listed in the table and provide screening as appropriate. Revise the development plan and landscape plan for consistency regarding screen walls. Show all walls on both plans. Revise the plans to provide the required screening along the east property line adjacent to the TEP easement. Where an easement is located adjacent a property line the required screen walls may be placed at the easement line. The plans indicate that the required screen wall will be located within portions of the TEP easement and within the drainage easement. Revise as necessary. Depict graphically and identify the the required screening along Rita Road and Rita Tech Park Blvd on the development and landscape plans. Sheet 5 of the landscape plan includes a cluster of trees within what is decribed on the landscape plan as "future RV storage area". Please provide proper planting areas for the trees if necessary and revise the plans for consistency. Interior landscape borders are required along the east property line where not currently indicated (Shts.4&5). An interior border is also required between Pad 6 and the adjacent RX-1 zoned parcel. Revise the landscape and NPPO plans as necessary to clarify any phasing proposed for the project. The development plan includes a delineation of Phase 1 construction. Include notes and label landscape areas utilized to meet the stormwater harvesting requirements. LUC 3.7.4.3.B Retention/detention basins are required to be landscaped per DS 10-01.0. Revise the landscape plans to include landscaping as directed in the standard; revise all other plans as necessary to accomodate the required landscaping. LUC 3.7.4.3.B Basins located adjacent to streets must be planted for 35% minimum coverage and include trees and shrubs. In addition, all basins are subject to LUC 3.7.2.7 which requires dust control treatment for all areas of the site. Revise the plans as necessary. |
| 11/26/2002 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW | Completed | |
| 11/27/2002 | JIM EGAN | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved 11/27/02. |
| 12/10/2002 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO : CITY PLANNING FROM : KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT : D02-0042 RITA 244 RETAIL CENTER/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE : December 9, 2002 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/ addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Correct Rita Tech Park Blvd to Rita Tech Place (streets DP 2 and DP 5). 2.) Add recording Book and Page for Block Plat to Legal Description in Title Block. 3.) Renumber Pads on sheet DP 2, l thru 8 (there are two number threes). 4.) Label all Pads/Buildings on all sheets. |
| 12/17/2002 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Telephone: 520-884-3879 Fax: 520-770-2002 WR#98247 December 17, 2002 Mr. David Tannous Sayler-Brown Bolduc 1010 N. Alvernon Way Tucson, Arizona 85711 Dear Mr. Tannous:: SUBJECT: Rita 244 Retail Center D02-0042 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated November 22, 2002. It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development. The existing TEP easements are depicted, and may be utilitized in serving this project. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Randy Alday Distribution Services – DS301 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 884-3879, should you have any questions. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgr cc: C. Gross, City of Tucson |
| 12/20/2002 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Subdivision and Development Pima Association of Governments Review Requests Transportation Planning Division CASE #: D02-0042 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 NAME: Rita 244 Retail Center Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 DATE: 12/20/2002 STREET NUMBER 1 Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street Rita Rd (north of I-10) Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? No Year: Planned Action: Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 9,100 Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 24,500 Existing Number of Lanes: 2 Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 27,640 Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” 24,500 Future Number of Lanes: 2 Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development 4,953 (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) None Existing or Planned Bikeway None Remarks: STREET NUMBER 2 Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? No Year: Planned Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 0 Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 0 Existing Number of Lanes: 0 Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 0 Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” 0 Future Number of Lanes: 0 Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: |
| 12/23/2002 | DALE KELCH | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering recommends DISAPPROVAL of this DP 1. The conditions listed on sheet DP1 (1A) state that there shall be a maximum of 2 access points on Rita Rd. The plans show 5 access points. 2. The access points to the site are required to line up with existing access points on the west side of Rita Road. The access points on the west side of Rita Road are not shown. I can not determine if they line up. 3. SVT's need to be labeled as to dimensions (shts 3-5) 4. SVT's as shown on the plans do not match the legend provided (shts 3-5) 5. Show dimensions of ALL PAAL's. Specifically missing those to the east of the proposed buildings on sheet 4. 6. NO PAAL's are dimensioned on sheet 5. 7. Show dimensions of driveways on sheet 5. NONE are shown. 8. Engineer's seal is not signed on sheet 5. 9. There are no median modifications for southbound truck deliveries to access the site. Is all truck delivery intended to come from the south? D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 12/24/2002 | DAN CASTRO | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ZONING | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 23, 2003. 2. This project has been assigned development plan case number D02-0042. Please note the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 3. a) Under general note number five (5), please revise the proposed use to state "mixed use." b) Since this a mixed use project, compliance with L.U.C. Sec. 6.2.13 "mixed use" definition is required. c) Please note all applicable "subject to" sections as they are listed in L.U.C. Sec. 2.5.4.2. d) Demonstrate graphically or by note, compliance with "subject to" Sec. 3.5.10.3.F. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 4. General note 23 does not apply to this site. Please delete. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 5. Label and dimension future curb location along Rita Road. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C/ D.S. 2-05.2.4.F 6. Cross parking and cross access is required for all lots or the lots may be combined into one (1) tax code. If the lot combination is desired, please contact me to receive a copy of the City of Tucson Lot Combination Covenant. The covenant must signed, notarized, and recorded. A copy of the recorded covenant along with an approved copy of the Pima County Assessors Tax Combination form must be submitted to the Zoning Review Section for City records prior to development plan approval. 7. Dimension PAAL widths on sheet 5 of 5. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 8. Demonstrate how the all pads will be connected with a pedestrian path. Refer to D.S. 2-08 for on-site pedestrian circulation system requirements. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K 9. The loading zone calculation must be based on the individual land use class for each pad and its respective gross floor area. Please revise to comply with the requirements of L.U.C. Sec. 3.4.5. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O 10. a) Add the width of the parallel parking spaces shown on sheet 4 of 5. The minimum width required for a parallel parking space is eight (8) feet. b) Demonstrate maneuverability into/out of the RV parking spaces. c) Under the parking calculations block on sheet 1 of 5, please note the number of rooms proposed for the hotel. d) The number of required handicap parking spaces totals 30, please revise. e) Please note the number of van accessible spaces required and provided. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P 11. a) Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking detail, which complies with the criteria under D.S. 2-09. b) Pads 3, 4, and 6 show an incorrect number of bicycle parking spaces required. The number of bicycle parking spaces is based on the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided for each pad as listed under L.U.C. Sec. 3.3.4. Per L.U.C. Sec. 3.3.3.5, if the calculated number of required bicycle parking spaces is less than two (2) i.e. Pad 6, the minimum number of required spaces is two (2). D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q 12. Indicate the refuse container location for pads 3 and 4. D.S. 2-05.2.4.T 13. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free-standing signage including billboards and outdoor lighting. D.S. 2-05.2.4.W |
| 12/24/2002 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | Jim Stoyanoff - no objection-12/23//02 |
| 12/24/2002 | LAITH ALSHAMI | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ENGINEERING | Denied | SUBJECT: Rita 244 Retail Center D02-0042, T15S, R15E, SECTION 27 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on November 19, 2002 The subject project has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Drainage Report: 1. Provide the detention/retention basin geometry and dimensions and the proposed inlet and outlet ratings in order to check the routing calculations. 2. It is not clear which basins are designed to be for runoff detention and which are for retention. 3. Address the detention/retention basin Security Barriers requirements based the information on page 82 of the "Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual". 4. Submit percolation test results, which demonstrate that the proposed retention basin will operate Adequately. 5. The drainage report did not address erosion control requirements for the proposed detention/retention basins inlets and outlets and the proposed culverts outlets. Provide design calculations as necessary. 6. The Drainage Plan for developed conditions should provide additional and detailed proposed drainage solutions and structures information for the proposed development (i.e. drainage patterns, detention basin dimensions, side slopes, depth, outlet, inlet, erosion control pads, and maintenance access location and dimensions, proposed discharge methods/structures, proposed curb opening dimensions and locations, sidewalk scuppers, water harvesting areas, erosion hazard setback lines etc.). Additionally, show how you propose to convey onsite runoff to the proposed water harvesting basins. 7. Based on the requirements of Section 1.5.2. and Chapter 14 of the Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson, Arizona, provide a maintenance access for thew proposed detention/retention basin and address in the Drainage Report the basin maintenance responsibility including a maintenance check list. 8. According to D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk. This also applies to roof drainage. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement and include any design calculations in drainage report. Development Plan: 1. The location map should be on the first sheet (D.S. 2-05.2.1.D). 2. Verify that this development is subject to the Scenic Corridor Zone as stated in General Note 23. 3. Provide the correct D(yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2. 4. Add all applicable general note concerning which lots are impacted by floodplain as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.C. 5. Include all applicable wastewater general notes as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.F. 6. Are all existing easements remaining? 7. Dimension all applicable public right of way as required by D.S.2-05.2.3.C. 8. Indicate the existing ground elevations as required by D.S.2-05.2.3.E. 9. Show and label any existing storm drainage facilities adjacent to the site? (D.S. 2-05.2.3.F). 10. Show the existing floodplain information as described in D.S.2-05.2.3.I. 11. All proposed easements are to be dimensioned (D.S.2-05.2.4.G.). 12. Provide all relevant drainage information as required by D.S.2-05.2.4.H. 13. Show all applicable setback lines including erosion hazard setbacks (D.S.2-05.2.4.I.). 14. Show on site pedestrian circulation (D.S.2-05.2.4.K.). 15. Show and label existing and proposed sidewalks (D.S.2-05.2.4.L.). 16. Show refuse collection areas (D.S.2-05.2.4.T.). 17. According to D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. and D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk. This also applies to roof drainage. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement. 18. Show the required water harvesting basins. 19. Revise the Development Plan according to the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: 1. Show the sight visibility triangles to ensure that the project is in compliance with the requirements of D.S. 3-01.5.1.A.1. 2. Show water-harvesting basins. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Drainage Report and Landscape Plan |
| 12/26/2002 | ROGER HOWLETT | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D02-0042 Rita 244 Retail Center 12/24/02 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C09-00-23; C15-00-05 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: December 23, 2002 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 12-17-02 Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments Rita 244 Retail Center, D02-0042 The applicant’s site was rezoned from I-2 to C-2 on October 23, 2002 and is subject to meeting certain rezoning conditions, as well as, being in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the General Plan, Esmond Station Area Plan, and Design Guidelines Manual. The Esmond Station Area Plan calls for rezoning requests to be reviewed by Davis-Monthan with regards to current and future base operations. Davis-Monthan Air Force Base after reviewing the proposed project, which is within the DMAFB approach/departure paddle, recommended that the any lodging facility be a low-profile structure without a conference center in order to prevent large numbers of people gathering at this location. It was also recommended that sound attenuation be considered in the design of the lodging facilities, as more noise exposure would result at the proposed location. Please indicate in the General Notes section a note to read, “The proposed project is within the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base approach/departure paddle, and if lodge facilities are constructed they will be a low-profile structure without a conference center, and the design of these lodge facilities will include sound attenuation features.” The development plan references a cross access easement, and provides vehicular connections to all uses. However, the development plan does not appear to provide or address a safe and efficient pedestrian circulation system connecting all uses within the proposed development. Please include a note in the General Notes section that references said cross access easement for the proposed project; and demonstrate on the development plan a safe, efficient, and attractive pedestrian circulation system that connects all uses for the proposed development, to include, but not limited to, using raised or textured pedestrian crosswalks in all locations where the pedestrian system crosses PAAL’s, to be aligned with onsite and offsite pedestrian crossings, walkways with tree planting and landscape strips, shaded connecting promenades, pedestrian walkways distinguished from vehicular areas by brick, concrete pavers, scored or patterned colored concrete. Provide building elevations that depict similar level of architecture detailing for all sides of buildings and structures for the development. (Rezoning Condition no. 14) Provide a wall detail and a note in the General Notes section to read, “Any required or proposed masonry screens walls shall be located of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. Those screen walls visible from the public right-of-way shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials: (a) tile, (b) stone, (c) brick, (d) textured brick/block, (e) a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or (f) a combination of the above materials. In addition, any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and 3 feet in height shall vary the wall alignment (jog, curve, notch, or setback, etc.) and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations. (Rezoning Condition no. 9) Provide a note in the General Notes section to read, “All outdoor lighting shall be directed down and away from public roadways and be as low in elevation as possible.” (Rezoning Condition no. 10) Defer to Development Services for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 1. A and B, 11, 12, 15, 16, and 20. Defer to Traffic Engineering for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 2, and 3. Defer to Floodplain Engineering for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide a note to the General Notes section to read, “A ‘fair disclosure’ statement indicating that certain types of military air and ground training activity occur at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base and that the subject property is located within territory in the vicinity of a military airport in accordance with state law, shall be included as part of any development plans, final plats, information brochures, and sale/rental agreements.” (Rezoning Condition no. 8) Plan policy encourages projects to develop pad buildings that allow safe and efficient interaction with other pads, i.e. pedestrian and vehicular links by adjusting proposed site layout to minimize building interference with convenient pedestrian pathways. Please reconfigure site layout to better link and improve the quality of pedestrian experience for this proposed project. Limit vehicular ingress/egress access for the proposed project by removing the southern access point for Block 12 and limiting the access points in Blocks 11 and 10 to only one (1) ingress/egress entrance. |