Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D02-0041
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/13/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/24/2003 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 11/28/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | City Engineer approval is required in order to locate code required landscaping in the public right of way. Provide written verification of any approvals granted for landscaping in the Speedway Boulevard right of way area. LUC 3.7.2.4.B |
| 11/28/2003 | FRODRIG2 | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | TO: Plans Coordination Office Development Services Department FROM: David Rivera Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner Zoning Review Section PROJECT: D03-0041 Office Building for Menick Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: November 28, 2003 DUE DATE: November 26, 2003 The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera at (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D030041dpa.doc |
| 12/01/2003 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | To: Craig Gross Project Manager SUBJECT: 6455 E. Speedway Blvd. D02-0041 (Third Review) T14S, R15E Section 06 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan and Drainage Report cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. All comments have been addressed. The DP is approved by Engineering. 2. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. The SWPPP is required to be submitted along with the grading plan. Drainage Report: 1. The Drainage report was reviewed for Development plan purposes only. Approval will be given at the Grading plan stage. 2. The DR is conditionally accepted. 3. Percolation tests are required prior to the approval of subsurface infiltration system. The rate of percolation cannot exceed 12 hours. Please submit the percolation results on the next submittal. The percolation results were not found in this submittal. A determination if the sub-surface retention basins will work properly cannot made until the percolation results are made available. Per previous comment. 4. A provision for maintenance must be provided for the subsurface retention basin. Please add maintenance responsibility note to the Drainage report. My apologies, the Maintenance checklist should also be included in the drainage report. Maintenance Checklist: Maintenance checklist for detention/retention basin Drainage System Feature Check Problem Conditions to Check For Conditions that should Exist General Trash & debris buildup in basin Dumping of yard wastes such as grass clippings and branches into basin. Unsightly accumulation of non-degradable materials such as glass, plastic, metal, foam and coated paper. Remove trash and debris and dispose as prescribed by the City of Tucson. Trash rack plugged or missing Bar screen over outlet more than 25% covered by debris or missing. Replace screen. Remove trash and debris and dispose as prescribed by the City of Tucson Fire Hazard or pollution Presence of chemicals such as natural gas, oil and gasoline, obnoxious color, odor or sludge noted. Find sources of pollution and eliminate them. Water is free from noticeable color, odor or contamination. Vegetation not growing or is overgrown For grassy detention/retention basins, grass cover is sparse and weedy or is overgrown. For grassy detention/retention basins, selectively thatch, aerate and re-seed. Grass cutting unnecessary unless dictated by aesthetics. Rodent holes Any evidence of rodent holes if facility is acting as a dam or berm, or any evidence of water pipe through dam or berm via rodent holes. Rodents destroyed and dam or berm repaired. Contact Pima County Health Department for guidance. Tree growth Tree growth does not allow maintenance access or interferes with maintenance activity (e.g. slope mowing, silt removal, or equipment movements). If trees are not interfering with access, leave trees alone. Trees do not hinder maintenance activities. Side slopes of pond Erosion on berms or at entrance or exit Check around inlets and outlets for signs of erosion. Check berms for signs of sliding or settling. Action is needed where eroded damage over 2 inches deep and where there is potential for continued erosion. Find causes of erosion and eliminate them. Then slopes should be stabilized by using appropriate erosion control measure(s): e.g., rock reinforcement, planting of grass, compaction. Storage area Sediment build-up in basins Accumulated sediment that exceeds 10% of the designed basin depth. Buried or partially buried outlet structure probably indicates significant sediment deposits. Sediment cleaned out to designed basin shape and depth: basin re-seeded if necessary to control erosion. Basin dikes Settlements Any part of dike which has settled 4 inches lower than the design elevation. Dike should be built back to the design elevation. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 6455 E. Speedway Blvd._cdrc_3 |