Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D02-0038
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/20/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/21/2003 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | SUBJECT: Shopping Center D02-038, T15S, R15E, SECTION 26 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on November 05, 2003 The subject project has been reviewed. The Drainage Report is acceptable for Development Plan purposes and it is hereby approved. The Development and Landscape Plans are recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain. |
| 11/24/2003 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 January 06, 20034 TO: Steven Gregor, P.E., Gregor & Grenier Engineering, Inc. THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (representing Pima County Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality) Pima County Development Review Division SUBJECT: Shopping Center, NCW Rita Road and Houghton Road Development Plan - 3rd Submittal D02-0038 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management (PCWWM) Department. This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. Separate review letters from PDEQ and PCWWM representatives will not be prepared for this project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Sheet 1: It is our understanding that the name of the owner/developer has been changed to Rita and Houghton, LLC. Please revise this sheet accordingly. 2. Sheet 2: The existing public sewer manhole on the north end of the 8"existing sewer line under the public drainage is mislabeled. Please re-label it as EX. MH #44-1. This manhole is located within and on the north side of the public drainage. 3. Sheet 2: Label the existing manhole on the south end of the 8" existing public sewer line under the public drainage as EX. MH #44. This manhole is located in the Rita Road right-of-way. 4. Sheet 2: Item 2 of Subhash Raval’s August 21, 2003 review letter has not been adequately addressed: Adequate legal vehicular access to existing manhole #44-1 has not been provided. As verbally agreed yesterday, the best way to address this issue may be to convert this section of public sewer into a private sewer. The Pima County Wastewater Management Department will televise this section of public sewer line and provide your office with a copy of the log and the videotape. Your office will need to: a) Delete General Note 19. b) Submit a written request to this office for Pima County Wastewater Management for the abandonment of the 8" existing public sewer line (G-84-89) between EX. MH #44 and EX. MH #44-1 for conversion to a private sewer. c) Label this section of existing public sewer line with the phrase, TO BE ABANDONED AND CONVERTED TO PRIVATE SEWER on Sheet 2 of the development plan, If this option cannot be pursued please contact this office as soon as possible, so that we another mutually acceptable way of addressing this issue. 5. Item 1 of Subhash Raval’s August 21, 2003 review letter has not been adequately addressed. The three signed and notarized originals of the revised Sewer Service Agreement sent to must be returned this office before we can approve this development plan. 6. We will require a complete set of the revised bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of a development plan or subdivision plat. The review fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 4th submittal. Please include a $38.00 check for the wastewater review fees (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) with the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If other sheets are added to the set of plans, or revised in such a manner that the sewer design is impacted, please adjust the review fee accordingly. 7. We will expedite our review of the next submittal of this project, provided that the cover letter accompanying this submittal is clearly marked, TO BE EXPEDITED PER TIM ROWE’S JANUARY 05, 2004 REVIEW LETTER. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6563. Tim Rowe, P.E., Development Review Engineer (Wastewater) Pima County Development Review Division TR/tr Copy: Project |
| 11/24/2003 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approv-Cond | DATE: December 19, 2003 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, Project D02-0038 Shopping Center Resubmittal(11/20/03): Development Plan CC: Craig Gross Patricia Gehlen Steve Anderson Frank Bangs Staff approves the development plan for this project provided the Proposed General Note(below) submitted by Frank Bangs is included on the final engineering and architectural development plans. Please feel free to call me at 791-4873 x 215 if you have any questions. Proposed General Note for Development Plan D02-0038, Shoppes at Rita Ranch Rita Road Greenway. The developer will construct a 12-foot wide paved path parallel to Rita Road for the length of the property subject to the development plan. The path shall be placed in the right-of-way of Rita Road and/or an improved public drainageway between Rita Road and the property in the approximate location determined by representatives of the City, Pima County and the developer on November 12, 2003. The path shall be constructed of asphaltic concrete in accordance with specifications provided to the developer by Pima County. Construction of the path shall occur in the first phase of the project, which includes the anchor tenant and major site improvements. The City shall be responsible for obtaining any necessary permits or approvals for the path, if any, from governmental agencies other than the City. |
| 11/24/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE REVISED COMMENTS Regarding CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT: D02-0038 The Shoppes at Rita Ranch 11/26/2003 ( ) Tentative Plat ( x ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( x ) Other: Landscape Plan CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation Case No. C9-84-84, APPLICABLE PLAN: Esmond Station Area Plan MAJOR ROUTE: Houghton Rd and Rita Rd COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/03/2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASKFORCE, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( x ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( x ) Development Plan ( ) Other: Elevations REVIEWER: E. Anderson DATE: 11/26/2003 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE D02-038 The Shoppes at Rita Ranch Third Review This development plan is subject to the conditions of Annexation Case No. C9-84-84, the recent ADOT study of Houghton Road, and the Esmond Station Area Plan. Please address the following: 1. As discussed during our meeting of March 6, 2003 and requested on the review dated 07/30/2003 and 11/18/2003, please provide the following note on the development plan: "Access onto Houghton Road may be closed in the future, to accommodate future improvements on the right-of-way of Houghton Road. All future successors and tenants will be informed of this situation in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions to be recorded at Pima County Recorder's Office". |
| 11/24/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE REVISED COMMENTS Regarding CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT: D02-0038 The Shoppes at Rita Ranch 03/12/04 () Tentative Plat ( x ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Other: Landscape Plan CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation Case No. C9-84-84, APPLICABLE PLAN: Esmond Station Area Plan MAJOR ROUTE: Houghton Rd and Rita Rd COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/12/2004 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASKFORCE, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached (x) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 11/26/03 ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Other: Elevations REVIEWER: E. Anderson DATE: 03/12/2004 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE D02-038 The Shoppes at Rita Ranch Fourth Review This development plan is subject to the conditions of Annexation Case No. C9-84-84, the recent ADOT study of Houghton Road, and the Esmond Station Area Plan. Please address the following: As discussed during a meeting on March 6, 2003 and requested on the reviews, the following note shall be provided on the development plan. This note can be added on the mylar and shall be approved by the CDRC Manager. “The Developer acknowledges that the City of Tucson and the State of Arizona are evaluating designs for the future improvement of Houghton Road adjacent to the development site which may limit the direct access to and from Houghton Road shown on this development plan. Notice of this possible future limitation of access will be provided by the Developer to future successors in interest and tenants by covenants, conditions and restrictions recorded in the Office of the Pima County Recorder, Book 12100, page 565 (the "CCRs"). The CCRs include as an exhibit an alternative access plan for ingress only from Houghton Road using an on-site frontage road. The City has acknowledged that this plan is a possible alternative access method.” |
| 11/24/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 11/24/2003 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. The SCZ plan is currently under review. All required elements of the SCZ (i.e. 30 foot buffer, view corridors, approved colors, etc..) as shown on the approved SCZ plan must be added to the development plan, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 2. a) Dimension the vehicle stacking spaces for all drive-through facilities. Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.2.d, length of a stacking space is 18 feet. b) Dimension the drive-through lane width for the Fry's supermarket. Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.2.b, minimum drive-through lane width leading to the window is 11 feet, at the window it may be nine (9) feet wide. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608. |
| 12/05/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The Native Plant Preservation Plan Inventory list indicates that all protected plants will be removed or relocated. This is not in compliance with the SCZ requirements. All existing native vegetation is to remain in place within the scenic route buffer area. LUC 3.7.5.2. Revise the Native Plant Inventory List to distinguish plants to be preserved in place from transplants. 2) Revise the landscape plans to identify existing protected plants to be preserved-in-place. Typically, a different symbol is used distinguish PIP's from others. 3) The note under "Relocated Native Trees" on sheet L-1 requires revision; it states that "70 trees were relocated as noted on the native plant inventory". Based upon revised calculations received the actual number is lower. 4) Revise the Native Plant Preservation Summary Table on sheet NP1 to match the revised table on sheet L-1. 5) Add notes to the development plan regarding any plantings which may be located in the public right of way. Landscaping must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. (Ord. No. 9392, §1, 5/22/00) B. All vegetation must comply with the requirements of Sec. 3.7.2.2. (For scenic route areas native plants are required. DS 9-06.0) C. The landscaping may not interfere with the use of the sidewalk" per LUC 3.7.2.9. Contact Gary Wittwer L.A. for the Dept. of Transportation, Engineering Division at 791-5100 for the necessary approvals and or permits. |