Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CDRC RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D02-0036
Review Name: CDRC RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/12/2002 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW | Completed | |
| 12/20/2002 | DAN CASTRO | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ZONING | Approv-Cond | ENGINEERING: The previous Engineering comments have been addressed in a satisfactory manner. The development plan is approvable for Engineering purposes. A grading plan/permit will be required. Reviewer: Matt Flick (for Paul Machado) Date: 26DEC02 Site Plan Resubmittal Required: No |
| 12/20/2002 | DAN CASTRO | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ZONING | Approv-Cond | The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.F, sidewalk or pedestrian refuge areas may not be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space. Please relocate the striped pedestrian path located between the PAAL and the loading space. |
| 12/23/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | LANDSCAPE | Approved | ENGINEERING: The previous Engineering comments have been addressed in a satisfactory manner. The development plan is approvable for Engineering purposes. A grading plan/permit will be required. Reviewer: Matt Flick (for Paul Machado) Date: 26DEC02 Site Plan Resubmittal Required: No |
| 12/26/2002 | PAUL MACHADO | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ENGINEERING | Approved | ENGINEERING: The previous Engineering comments have been addressed in a satisfactory manner. The development plan is approvable for Engineering purposes. A grading plan/permit will be required. Reviewer: Matt Flick (for Paul Machado) Date: 26DEC02 Site Plan Resubmittal Required: No |
| 12/27/2002 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering recommends DISAPPROVAL of this DP. 1. The symbol that is used for signs is not in compliance with SD100 of PC/COT STANDARD DETAILS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT 1994 Edition. SD100 sheet 5 of 8 shows that new signs shall be a 1/16" diameter solid circle with a 5/8" line centered tangent to the circle. The sign symbol is incorrect on sheets 1, 3 in plan view and on sheets 1-3 in the legend. The symbol that is used for signs in detail 2 on sheet 4 does not match the symbol used elsewhere in the plan set. If the symbol used for signs in this detail had a solid circle, it would be acceptable. 2. There are several other symbols used in the legends that are not in compliance with SD100 that don't fall within Traffic's review area. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |