Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: D02-0034
Parcel: 133243690

Address:
100 N PANTANO RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: CDRC - DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D02-0034
Review Name: CDRC - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/17/2002 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW Completed
10/23/2002 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied PIMA COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL

PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO : CITY PLANNING
FROM : KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT : D02-0034 DEPARTMENT STORE / DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE : October 22, 2002


***********************************************************************************************************

The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/ addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:



1: Legal Description in Title Block will need to include recorded Book and Page for Broadway Pantano Center prior to approval of this project.
10/25/2002 JOE LINVILLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LANDSCAPE Denied 1. Landscaping and screening is required for Lot 5.
Screening for the proposed loading area and any refuse storage areas is also required. LUC Table 3.7.2-I

2. The required eight-foot wide sidewalk from the Pantano Road main entry to pad does not include the required three foot wide landscape strip along the entire length as required in the special exception condition. Revise the plan as necessary to comply.

3. The parking spaces and accompanying curbs and wheel stops facing CentrePark drive and Pantano Road must be designed such that vehicles parked in the spaces do not overhang the 10' wide street landscape borders. Revise the plans as necessary to clarify compliance. DS 2-06.3.3.E

4. The proposed revision to the screen wall location along Centrepark Drive is not acceptable. Per LUC 3.7.3.2.C.3 "Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border." Revise the plans to locate the walls in compliance with code section cited.

5. Screening is required for the refuse storage/trash compactor area on the east side of the site. LUC Table 3.7.2-I.
11/01/2002 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


Telephone: 520-884-3879
Fax: 520-770-2002
WR#94826 October 31, 2002


Mr. Craig Hunt
Entranco, Inc.
1860 E. River Road, Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85718

Dear Mr. Hunt:

SUBJECT: Department Store,Lots 4 & 6, Broadway &Pantano
D01-0034

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the Development Plan dated October, 2002. It appears that there are no existing facilities or conflicts within the boundaries of this proposed development.

Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:

Nancy DiMaria
Distribution Services – DS-101
Tucson Electric Power Company
P. O. Box 711
Tucson, AZ 85702

Please call me at (520) 884-3879, should you have any questions.

Sincerely,



S. Glynda Rothwell
Right-of-Way Agent
Land Management

sgr
cc: Criag Gross, City of Tucson
11/13/2002 ZELIN CANCHOLA CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering DISAPPROVES this development plan pending submittal of the Traffic Impact Analysis Addendum.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us
11/13/2002 PETER MCLAUGHLIN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner

FOR: Patricia Gehlen
Principal Planner

PROJECT:
D02-031
Broadway Pantano Center
Lots 4, (5) and 6
199 N. Pantano Road
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: November 13, 2002
DUE DATE: November 13, 2002


1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 16, 2003.

2. Place the development plan number (D02-031) on each sheet of development plan and landscape plan, in the lower right hand corner near the title block.
DS 2-05.2.1.K

3. It is unclear if lot 5 is included as part of this project. It is listed in the general notes and included in the project calculations, but it is not listed in the title block and is indicated as "future" on the project key map on sheet 1 of 5. It is stated in the legal description that it a portion of lot 5. Please clarify and revise title block if needed.

4. Because there is cross-access being provided between the lots, a cross-access agreement must be recorded prior to approval of the d.p. Please provide a copy of recorded cross-access agreement to the Zoning Review Section and add a note to the plan with the recordation information for the cross-access agreement.

5. Rezoning condition 14 requires that the principal access to the Centrepark II residential subdivision shall be separate from the access to the commercial development (although they may share a common entry off of Pantano Road), and requires that the geometry be designed to prevent truck traffic The new development plan proposal removes the other proposed access road (and its lighting) leading from Pantano Road to the Home Depot. Please clarify by indicating how access will be provided for Home Depot truck traffic from Pantano Road.

6. Provide recordation information for the utility easements. All proposed easements must be recorded and recordation information added to the plan prior to approval.
DS 2-05.2.3.B
DS 2-05.2.4.G

7. Between any building and PAAL a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge with a four (4) foot sidewalk is required. There is no sidewalk/refuge shown along the south side of the department store building.
DS 3-05.2.2.B.1
DS 2-08.4.1.B

8. A continuous pedestrian sidewalk must be provided to connect the department store with the on-site pedestrian system along Centrepark Drive. The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. DS 2-08.4.1.A

9. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning conditions 43 and 46, which require the 8' minimum sidewalk and adjacent 3' minimum landscape border to be integrated along the front of Pad "D", and that they be continuous between buildings for their entire length, except at intersections with PAALS. The 8-foot sidewalk connecting the Home Depot to Pantano Road has been rerouted to the south of the proposed department store and it is not clear that it has a 3-foot landscape strip for its entire length within the Home Depot parcel. Please clarify and revise as needed.
DS 2-05.2.4.U

10. A minimum 2 ½-foot vehicle overhang area is required, or wheelstops must be placed in the front of vehicle parking spaces where there are walls, landscaped areas, and sidewalks. It is not clear that a 2 ½ foot overhang exists between the front of the northern row of parking spaces and the proposed wall, and between the southern and eastern rows of parking and the landscaped areas. Please provide wheelstops, dimensioned at 2 ½ feet from the front of parking spaces in all areas where there is not a 2 ½-foot vehicle overhang provided.
DS 3-05.2.3.C

11. All requested changes must be made to the development plan and landscape plan.
DS 2-07.2.1.A

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
11/14/2002 PAUL MACHADO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING Denied To: Craig Gross

SUBJECT: New Department Store-Pantano and Broadway Center
D02-0034 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 08

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Hydrology Report

The Development Plan (DP) and Hydrology Report (HR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. It is not clear what has been or not improved. The review comments may not reflect the current conditions if it is unclear as to what has been constructed.
2. A separate grading submittal will be required prior to the issuance of any permits.
3. Complete the book and page in the legal description.
4. Complete the dkt. and pg. of all easements recorded for this DP.
5. Indicate the closures of any ingress/egress points on Centrepark Drive. No parking is allowed in the sight visibility triangle. The line type on the svts on Centrepark is the same as the EHS, please differentiate. D.S. 3-01.5.1.
6. Please call out all curb access ramps per COT SD 207.
7. Please provide Drainage patterns, proposed finish floor elevation and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
9. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. and call out the percentage of slopes on the section and on the plans. Call out all grade breaks and at the D/W, if applicable.
10. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns and show locations of sidewalk scuppers. 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4.
11. Dimensions from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, S/W, utilities etc. per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
12. A separate permit is required for any work done in the right-of-way. Call Transportation Department at 791-4942 for additional information.
13. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
14. Call out the development plan number (D02-0034) on all sheets.
15. Add basin responsibility note to notes. Call out the master hydrology report and the date the HR was approved to satisfy this comment.
16. Add note on whether public or private refuse collection will be used.
17. Fully dimension the stationary compact area. Contact the Sanitation Division for determination of exact placement, dimensions and specifications per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32.
18. List the inverts on the storm drain coming from the 4' recessed truck well.

Hydrology Report:
The HR is accepted and approved.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 or pmachad2@ci.tucson.az.us
Paul Machado
Senior Engineering Associate,
C:/Department Store
11/18/2002 ROGER HOWLETT CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D02-0034 Department Store 11-15-02

() Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
( ) Site Plan

CROSS REFERENCE: S02-011, C9-00-39, SE-01-28

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: November 13, 2002

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
( ) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
( ) Site Plan

REVIEWER: JBeall DATE: 11-6-02

Comprehensive Planning Task Force Comments
Department Store, D02-0034


This is a Rezoning – Change of Conditions (C9-00-39) as adopted by Mayor and Council on July 1, 2002, and it is subject to meeting certain rezoning conditions.


It appears that Rezoning Condition [1] listed out on the development plan is missing a phrase. Please correct and revise the Development Plan, Sheet 2, Rezoning Conditions, Rezoning Condition [1] after the phrase “the color board dated August 15, 2001”, to include the words “the change of condition request plan dated May 17, 2002”.

Provide a note to the General Note section of the Development Plan on Sheet 1, to reference cross-access agreement with the adjoining shopping center on Broadway Boulevard [Rezoning Condition 7].

Due to the proposed large retail establishment on Lot 1, a special exception land use request (SE-01-28) was processed by the applicant, and approved on January 14, 2002 by Mayor and Council. Also Mayor and Council, on July 1, 2002, approved changes to conditions of three rezoning cases, C9-78-36, C9-87-50, and C9-00-39, each which affected portions of this project site. The new conditions of the three rezoning cases were made identical to the special exception conditions. Consequently, there are conditions in the Rezoning Conditions section of this Development Plan that are not applicable to Lot 4.
The following conditions which are applicable to the large retail development site, Lot 1, are: 1.d, 1.e, 2, 9, 13, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 44, 45, and 47.

Defer to Traffic Engineering for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 14.

Defer to Tucson Police Department for comments and compliance of the following rezoning condition: 39.

Provide a note to the General Notes section of the Site Plan, on Sheet 1, to read “All outdoor lighting shall be directed down and away from residential parcels and public roadways and be as low in elevation as possible. Outdoor lighting between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. shall be dimmed to the minimum required security and limited to low pressure sodium lighting.” as per Rezoning Conditions [32 and 42].

Defer to Floodplain Engineering for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, and 22.

Provide design detail for any required or proposed masonry screen walls as per Rezoning Condition [31].

Defer to Development Services for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 34, 35, 36, 37 and 38.

Provide a note to the General Notes section of the Site Plan to read “Delivery trucks shall not be parked in close proximity to or within a designated delivery or loading area during nondelivery hours with motors and/or refrigeration/generators running within three hundred (300) feet of the west and north property lines.”, as per Rezoning Condition [41].

The proposed project site is to provide convenient, landscaped and appropriately lighted pedestrian access from surround neighborhood to the north, the adjacent existing shopping center to the south, and the C-1 portion of this project. It does not appear that the Site Plan for the “Department Store – Pad D” has adequately demonstrated interconnectivity between the neighborhood to the north and the existing shopping center to the south, as well as the Home Depot pad to the west. Please indicate on the Site Plan the interconnectivity pathway between these various developments, including pedestrian marked areas that cross any PAALs and streets, as per Rezoning Condition [30].

The Site Plan indicates a building area square footage for Lot 4 (Pad “D”) of 88,000 square feet, which is larger than the building area per approved Development Plan (S02-11). The submitted Preliminary Development Plan indicated a building area for Lot 4 (Pad “D”) of 43,020 S.F., that was subsequently amended to approximately 63,000. However, the indicated building area of 88,000 square feet is still significantly larger than amended. Please address the expanded building area with Mr. Craig Gross, Development Service for comments and compliance as to the correct building area square footage for Lot 4 (Pad “D”).
12/02/2002 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Needs Review
12/02/2002 FRODRIG2 CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD REAL ESTATE Needs Review