Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D02-0033
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/12/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 12, 2007 To: John Wood Presidio Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Cooke Cable Vision, Lots 1-18 Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D02-033 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D02-033, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Add the following General Note: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 1: Add a General Note which states the following: Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Sheets 2,3 & 4:Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different linetypes in the legend on Sheet 1. Sheet 1A: Eliminate the sewer line shown on this sheet or include the comments for Sheets 2A to be applied to Sheet 1A. Sheet 2A: All public sewer elements (manholes/cleanouts and sewer mains), that are located on this project or are less than 100’ from this project, are to be identified with the wastewater plan and IMS numbers. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. Also the rim and invert elevations need to be shown. Sheet 2A: The sewer directional flow arrows need to be shown on plan. Sheet 2A: The public existing sewer line currently has the appearance on plan as stopping in both 16th St. and Curtis Av. Please revise to show the sewer line continuing. Also show the sewer line north of the property continuing thru the ROW for 15th St. Sheet 2A: A stub-out is shown off the 21” sewer line in the northern part of property. Show the length/slope and size. Also identify this line as Private BCS if this is the case. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/12/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Building permits are required for the two unpermitted buildings. |
| 07/18/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D02-0033 Cox Communication Revision Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 17, 2007 DUE DATE: July 26, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please provide the distance to the east and south property line from Building C and D. DS 2-05.2.4.I 2. Per DS 2-08.3.1 within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required to connect all buildings on the site. This connection shall be an accessible concrete sidewalk, four (4) feet in width, with a cross slope no greater than two (2) percent and be designed and constructed to convey the ten (10) year flood flows under the sidewalk. Please provide such a connection to Buildings C and D. DS 2-08.3.1 & DS 2-08.5.1 3. A five (5) foot wide pedestrian refuge that includes a four (4) foot wide sidewalk that is physically separate from the vehicle use area shall be provided between Building D. DS 2-08.4.1.B DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 4. A four (4) foot wide sidewalk shall be provided between Building C and the adjacent motor vehicle parking spaces on the west side. DS 2-08.4.1.C 5. Please provide wheel-stop curbing for those parking spaces that may overhang required sidewalk area on west side of Building C. Wheel-stop curbing is to be placed two and one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of the parking space. DS 3-05.2.3.C 6. Please provide in detail 4/3 angled parking space detail utilizing required dimensions and angles in DS 3-05.6.0 Table 1 7. All accessible curb ramps including the flush entrances of buildings shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. Please indicate location of all truncated domes on the development plan and revise details 5/3, 3/4 and provide truncated domes detail. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 8. Please provide note indicating compliance to LUC Development Designator "33". This note is to provide maximum allowed FAR (1.50) and proposed FAR for this site; Maximum allowed height (50 feet) and maximum proposed height; and minimum site area (0) and proposed site area> LUC 3.2.3.2.B 9. Please dimension Buildings C & D on the development plan. DS 2-05.2.4.N 10. Please correct the number of required parking spaces for Building D. Only one (1) space is required. Fractional amounts less than one-half (1/2) are adjusted to the next lower whole number. Please revise. LUC 3.3.3.8 11. FYI - Required parking for Administrative and professional offices is one (1) space per two hundred (200) sq. ft. GFA for the first floor plus one (1) space per two hundred and fifty (250) sq. ft. GFA for all other floors (above and below ground level). Utilizing this calculation would reduce required parking to one hundred and eight-nine (189) required spaces providing a surplus of one hundred and twenty-seven (127) motor vehicle parking spaces. LUC 3.3.4 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D02-0033dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 07/23/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Provide revised landscape plans for the entire site. The provisions LUC 3.7 now apply to the entire site based on the cumulative expansions of the vehicular use areas. LUC 3.7.1.2.B.1.b |
| 07/26/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D02-0033 Cox Communication: Revision () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: D02-033 & C9-82-18 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arroyo Chico GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 07/26/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 07/24/07 |
| 07/26/2007 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The following comments relate to the regulatory floodplain (there isn't one any more) and ponding limits: Sheet 1A: Remove floodplain-related notes 6 & 7 as the regulatory floodplain has been removed from this property. It is also suggested to remove the dashed line (dot-long dash) from the drawing to the right of the notes. Sheet 2A: Complete the ponding limits (2 dots - dash) so that they close. Sheet 2A: Remove the 100-year floodplain limits (dot- long dash) as they have been removed from the property and are no longer relevant. Sheet 2A: Remove Key Note #17. |
| 07/30/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#184072 July 9, 2007 Presidio Engineering, Inc. Attn: John Wood, PE 4582 N 1st Avenue, #120 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Mr. Wood: SUBJECT: Cox Communication - Revision D02-0033 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 27, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/30/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 30, 2007 Tanya Grahn Presidio Engineering, Inc. 4582 North 1st Avenue, Suite # 120 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D02-0033 Cox Communication Development Plan Dear Tanya: Your submittal of June 27, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, Wastewater, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 795-6747 dp-resubmittal |