Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CDRC - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D02-0025
Review Name: CDRC - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/22/2002 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW | Completed | |
| 08/26/2002 | JIM EGAN | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | FIRE | Approved | THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS APPROVED. |
| 08/26/2002 | JIM EGAN | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | FIRE | Approved | THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS APPROVED. |
| 09/04/2002 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | September 3, 2002 Mr. Bruce Paton Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Mr. Paton: SUBJECT: Williams Centre, Blocks 8 & 9 D02-0025 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated August 21, 2002. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City for TEP’s review. You may contact me at (520) 884-3879 if you have any questions. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgr Enclosure |
| 09/12/2002 | LAITH ALSHAMI | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ENGINEERING | Approved | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain, 09/12/2002 The subject project has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Drainage Report: 1. It appears that Figures 4 and 6 are missing. 2. Section 4.2 refers to Figure 5 as a soil type exhibit. However, Figure 5 in Appendix E shows cross section details. 3. Section 5.2 is unclearly written. Revise the section to clarify the intent. 4. Show on the Drainage Plan the locations of the cross sections shown in Figure 5. 5. The orifice analysis results in Appendix D appear to be inaccurate. Revise as necessary. 6. Provide soil percolation test to verify that the retention basins will operate adequately. 7. Provide a detailed inspection checklist and basin-performance criteria in the drainage report to be used by the engineer responsible of annual inspection as required by Section 1.5.2 "Maintenance of Detention/Retention Basins of the "Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson, AZ". 8. The weir length in HEC-1 (1AR) appears to be different from the drainage plan. Revise as necessary. 9. Provide volumes table, use SA cards or area data to check volumes. 10. The scupper width in HEC-1 (3BR) appears to be different from the drainage plan. Revise as necessary. 11. Check the rest of the HEC-1 analysis for similar discrepancies. Such discrepancies may require subsequent submittals and may delay the project approval. 12. How do you propose to convey onsite runoff to the proposed water harvesting basins? 13. According to D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk. This also applies to roof drainage. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement and include any design calculations in drainage report. Development Plan: 1. Either fill in the Address Box on the first sheet with the appropriate information or remove it completely. 2. Provide the correct D(yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2. 3. Keynote 9 is missing. 4. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown (D.S. 2-05.2.3.F). 5. It appears that the shown existing contour lines do not reflect the onsite stockpiling especially along Craycroft Road. Verify and correct as necessary to comply with the requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.3.E. 6. Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.1). 7. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow (it appears that some curb openings shown on sheet 2 of 4 are not shown on page 4 of 4. Additionally, proposed sidewalk scuppers and grates are shown but not labeled) (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2) 8. According to D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk. This also applies to roof drainage. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement. 9. Demonstrate compliance with Rezoning Conditions #18. 10. Demonstrate compliance with Rezoning Conditions #19. Contact Transportation City Engineer, Mr. Andy Dinauer, to determine method of payment. 11. Revise the Development Plan according to the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: 1. It appears that one of the proposed trees at the northern Williams Circle entrance encroaches on the sight visibility triangle. Revise. 2. Show water-harvesting basins. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report |
| 09/12/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | LANDSCAPE | Approved | Landscape Section 1) The perimeters of the Williams addition shall be landscaped to meet or exceed City Standards. Specifically the perimeter frontage along Broadway Boulevard and Craycroft Road shall be landscaped to a minimum depth of twenty feet. Revise the plans to include a twenty foot wide landscape buffer for all portions along the Craycroft Road frontage. Williams Addition Specific Plan (W.A.S.P.) 2) Provide total area of landscaping provided within the parking lot. As indicated on the plans 5% of the total parking lot area shall be landscaped. W.A.S.P. VII.4 3) The landscape plan should be presented at a scale of 1"=20' and include a maintenance schedule. WASP XI.B.1 4) Details on sheet 3 of the development plan indicate that plant materials proposed within the street landscape buffers may be subject to periodic and sometimes prolonged flooding and submersion. Revise the plan if necessary to provide materials appropriate for the situation. 5) Decomposed granite is specified for the landscape borders which are also providing stormwater retention. It may be necessary to develop different specifications for the basin areas consistent with the requirements of the Stormwater Detention /Retention Manual. DS 10-01.0 which recommends that dg not be placed in basin bottoms nor on slopes steeper than 4:1. 6) Locate utility easements on the landscape plan and design to avoid potential conflicts. Utility services are subject to landscape and screening regulations. LUC Table 3.7.2-I, DS 2-07.2.2 7) Screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I must be provided for loading areas located within 100 feet of an adjacent street. Revise the development and landscape plans as necessary to comply with the regulation. 8) The wall and handrail proposed in detail E on sheet 3 of the development plan should be re-evaluated for compliance with WASP V Development Policies. Revise plan as necessary to ensure that the appearance of the site from Williams Circle is attractive and suggestive of the southwest. 9) Exhibit C of the Williams Addition Specific Plan provides for planting areas between the sidewalk and Williams Boulevard and Circle and Cooper Street. VIII Landscaping control requires that additional landscaping be provided in the city right of way as approved by the City Engineer. Please contact the Department of Transportation regarding right of way issues. Re-submittal of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan is required. |
| 09/17/2002 | CDRC Review Process | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS APPROVED. |
| 09/17/2002 | CDRC Review Process | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ZONING | Approved | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera FOR: Patricia Gehlen Senior Planner Principal Planner PROJECT: D02-0025 Williams Centre – Blocks 8 & 9 Office, Retail, and Restaurant Uses Proposed Development Plan PAD-1 Zone TRANSMITTAL: September 12, 2002 DUE DATE: September 12, 2002 COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 22, 2002. 2. List as a reference the subdivision case number C12-85-51 in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. Revise general note 2 to state that the existing zoning is “PAD-1”. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 4. This project has been assigned the development plan case number D02-0025. List the development plan case number on all plan sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 5. A recorded cross access agreement is required. The parking spaces along the west side of the restaurant abut the west property line of lot 2 and have not been provided direct or onsite access. Please provide a copy of the proposed cross access agreement for review. The agreement must be in perpetuity and run with land. The agreement recordation information must be listed as a note and the location depicted on the plan. The agreement must be recorded prior to final approval of the development plan. DS 2-05.2.3.B 6. This site has been recently reconfigured. Please provide copies of the recorded legal descriptions. DS 2-05.2.4.A 7. Revise the zoning classifications adjacent to the parcel to PAD-1. DS 2-05.2.4.B 8. A pedestrian access easement will be required along the Craycroft Road frontage. The easement must be provided from the south driveway entrance to point at which the sidewalk is realigned with the City of Tucson right-of-way. The recordation information must be added to the plan and the easement depicted. A copy of the recorded documents must be provided prior to final approval of the development plan. Approval by the City of Tucson Real Estate Division may be required. Please contact Jim Rossi at 791-4881 for further information. DS 2-05.2.4.D.2 DS 2-05.2.4.G 9. Condition two (2) of Ordinance 9594 requires that the pedestrian corridor interconnect with the uses within the site. The onsite circulation does not interconnect building 3 with building 2 thus the circulation within the site has not been demonstrated. DS 2-05.2.4.K 10. The required loading zone for the restaurant on lot 2 has been provided on lot 1. A recorded cross access agreement to allow the use of the loading zone on lot 2 must be provided. The cross access agreement for the vehicle use area and the loading zone can be prepared as one document. Both types of access agreements must be in perpetuity and run with the land. DS 2-05.2.4.O 11. Clarify if the square footage for the building on lot 2 is 8,000 square feet as labeled or is it 10,000 square feet as noted under the calculations block. Please revise one or the other and revise the calculations as necessary. DS 2-05.2.4.M 12. Indicate graphically where possible and by notes, in all other instances compliance with the conditions of Ordinance 9594. A response letter stating how the conditions of Ordinance 9594 have been addressed must be provided. DS 2-05.2.4.U 13. Indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities and landscaping. A keynote may be used to indicate the type of service proposed or required by the Postal Service. DS 2-05.2.4.V 14. See landscape review comments for compliance with landscape borders, screening and NPPO. DS 2-05.2.4.X 15. Clarify if an addendum to the conditions of the ordinance 9594 has been done to include the FAR for the office use. Condition 9 allows a maximum FAR of .30 for retail and restaurant but does not include office use. The ordinance does include conditions, which allow or provide criteria for a mixed use in one building. How was a FAR of .50 used? (I acknowledge that the PAD-1 criteria for development area “C” allow .50 but the ordinance conditions would supersede the criteria, as they are more restrictive.) 16. Additional comments may be forthcoming on several issues based on the next submittal and response letters. 17. Accessible ramps must be provided at the landscape island that is located between buildings 1 and 2. It is not clear from the drawing where the front or main entrance doors to the proposed buildings are to be provided. If multiple entrances are proposed the accessible parking spaces should be distributed in a manner that would provide the parking at all entrances. Clarify if this is the case. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D020025dp.doc |
| 09/17/2002 | CDRC Review Process | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D02-0025 Williams Centre – Blocks 8 & 9 09/12/02 (-) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan (-) Revised Plan/Plat (-) Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-01-07 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Broadway Craycroft Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: 9.12.02 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (-) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (-) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions (-) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (-) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () 1st Story Floor Plans () Elevations and Color Renderings REVIEWER: Rafael Sebba DATE: 9.12.02 COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS D02-0025 Williams Centre – Blocks 8 & 9 This development is subject to the policies of the Williams Addition Planned Area Development. Please provide a letter of approval for building elevations and color renderings from the Williams Centre Design Committee. Please provide floor plans for the first floors of all proposed buildings, which indicate access and entrances to the buildings, and details of exterior features such as pedestrian facilities, landscaping, and patios. As submitted, pedestrian circulation systems to building entries are unclear, especially around trash enclosures and loading areas. Please provide elevations and a color rendering of all proposed buildings within the development. Please correct the graphic scales on sheets L-3 and L-4. Public sidewalks are to be located entirely within the public right-of-way, and are not to be included in the twenty (20’) foot landscape areas along Craycroft Road. Please revise both the development plan and landscape plan. Please provide pedestrian connections between Buildings 2 and 3, and additional pedestrian connections from the larger parking areas to the buildings. If detention is permitted along Williams Circle, please provide safety railing between the detention areas and the sidewalks. Please identify how compliance with Conditions 10 and 11 will be met. Please provide site area, building area, FAR, building coverage, and parking calculations for the entire site (Development Area ‘C’ as identified in the Williams Addition PAD), in addition to individual lot and building calculations. Building coverage must be calculated based on Item ‘B’ under ‘Definitions’ in the Williams Addition PAD. Please provide individual and total area calculations for all landscaped areas. Parking areas are to be landscaped in accordance with Item 6.c.2 of the Williams Addition PAD Traffic Plan. Pedestrian circulation systems, specifically gateway treatments and pathway lighting, will be further reviewed upon submittal of first story floor plans, and after appropriate parking lot screening has been determined by the Development Services Department. Subsequent submittals may result in additional comments. |
| 09/24/2002 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 September 16, 2002 TO: Bruce Paton, Rick Engineering THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Subhash Raval, P.E., Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions SUBJECT: Williams Centre, Blocks 8 & 9 Development Plan D02-025 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection rates. 3. We have sent to your office under separate cover a Private Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of fixture units. The Sewer Service Agreements must be signed by the owner of record, notarized, and all three originals returned to this office before we can approve the Development Plan. 4. Add the Development Plan case number, D02-025, to each sheet. In addition, add C12-85-51 as a reference project number. 5. The 6" HCS serving Building # 1 must also connect to the existing 8" sewer at a new or existing manhole. Please revise as necessary. 6. Add to the General Notes the following: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 7. We will require a Revised Development Plan. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact Tim Rowe at 740-6563. Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions SR/DK/dk Copy: Project |
| 09/27/2002 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC | Approved | THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS APPROVED. |
| 09/27/2002 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC | Approved | From: Dale Kelch To: Gross, Craig Date: 09/16/02 3:19 PM Subject: D02-0025 Williams Centre Blocks 8 & 9 Reply requested when convenient Traffic Engineering recommends approval of this development plan when the following deficiencies are corrected: 1. Add text for keynote 9 on sheet 2 of 4 2. Add SVT to NW corner of Craycroft/Williams Blvd sheet 2 of 4 3. Add SVT to SW corner of Craycroft/Cooper St sheet 2 of 4 D.Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520) 791-4259 X305 (520) 791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us cc: Canchola, Zelin: Rodriguez, Ferne |