Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CDRC - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D02-0022
Review Name: CDRC - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/09/2002 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW | Completed | |
| 08/13/2002 | CDRC Review Process | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | Approved subject to the close of escrow on the purchase of City property (RP #937) for this parking area. |
| 08/20/2002 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D02-0022 ANDREW URBAN FT LOWELL OFFICE BUILDING |
| 08/20/2002 | CDRC Review Process | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D02-0022 Ft. Lowell Office Building 08/16/02 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-18 - Rezoning Case NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant Alvernon GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: August 30, 2002 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall DATE: 8-16-02 Community Planning and Preservation Comments Fort Lowell Office Building, D02-0022 Since the proposed project is currently in the process of having its rear parking area rezoned from MH-1 to P, it is necessary to delay reviewing the proposed development plan until after the rezoning process has been completed. A design review requires the incorporation of rezoning conditions into the proposed project site design. Thus, it should be noted that the submitted development plan might be required to make changes in its design, such as but not limited to, increase in landscape screening, perimeter wall design, and internal pedestrian circulation. Please resubmit the development plan for review after the rezoning process has been completed and reviewed by the Zoning Examiner. The re-submittal of the development plan will need to include the rezoning conditions listed out on the development plan, with the appropriate design changes. |
| 08/22/2002 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | August 22, 2002 Mr. Andrew Urban Swaim Associates Architects 3936 E. Ft. Lowell Road, Suite 202 Tucson, AZ 85712 Dear Mr. Urban: SUBJECT: Ft. Lowell Office Building D02-0022 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans dated July 19, 2002. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. Although location of the existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project have been depicted, the Book and Page recording information of said easement must also be shown. Please resubmit a revised Development Plan to the City showing said recording information.. The City will then forward two copies of the Plan to TEP for review and approval. There does not appear to be a conflict with the existing electrical facilities. In the event a conflict does develop, all costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. You may contact me at (520) 884-3879 if you have any questions. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgr Enclosure cc: Craig Gross, City of Tucson |
| 08/26/2002 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | COMMENTS OF FILE |
| 08/29/2002 | CDRC Review Process | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ZONING | Denied | COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 8, 2003. 2. a) Under general note one (1), list the applicable rezoning file number. b) List the rezoning conditions on the plan. c) Note the rezoning file number and development plan file number (D02-022) in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. d) The site area addition is a greater than 25% expansion of the existing site area requiring a full code compliance review of the entire site. d) Since the rezoning conditions have not been provided, additional comments may be forthcoming upon further review of this plan. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 3. Lot combination is required for this site. Please contact me at 791-5608 ext. 1180 to make arrangements for you to receive a copy of the lot combination covenant prepared by the City Attorney's Office. The covenant must be recorded and a copy submitted to the Zoning Review Section prior to development plan approval. D.S. 2-05.2.3.A 4. Show all loading zones, fully dimensioned, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required and the number provided. Refer to L.U.C. 3.4.1 for off-street loading requirements. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O 5. Provide a fully dimensioned handicap parking space detail including the slope of the ramps. Access aisles serving car parking spaces shall be 60 inches wide minimum. Access aisles serving van parking spaces shall be 96 inches wide minimum. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Section 1107.3 94 UBC Revised 6. a) Provide the bicycle parking calculation, which includes the number and type of bicycle parking spaces required and provided. Refer to L.U.C. 3.3.4 for bicycle parking requirements. b) Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking space detail. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q/ L.U.C. 3.3.4/ D.S. 2-09 7. If applicable, provide a detail of existing and/or proposed free-standing signage and outdoor lighting on the site plan. D.S. 2-05.2.4.W 8. All requested changes must be made to the development and landscape plans. D.S. 2-07.2.1.A |
| 09/03/2002 | JOE LINVILLE | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | LANDSCAPE | Denied | LANDSCAPE SECTION J. LINVILLE Native Plant Preservation 1) Revise the size of the mitigation plants to min.15 gallon. LUC 3.8.6.6.A.2 LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING 1) Based on the proposed expansion, the entire site is subject to the provisions of LUC 3.7 and DS 2-06.0. Submittal of a complete landscape plan for the site is required. Provide plans in compliance with DS 2-07.2.0. Additional comments may apply pending review of the complete plan. 2) Masonry screen walls are required for the east and south property line. A variance would be required for any alternatives. LUC 5.1.7 3) An interior landscape border is required along the east property line. The interpretation in general note 13 and the exception cited on Sheet L1.0 are not applicable. However LUC Sec. 3.7.2.4.B.3 provides for an alternative that does not require the 10' wide landscape buffer, if an equivalent number of trees are located between the property line and the use. Revise the plans in compliance with the requirements of the section. The project may be subject to conditions related to the rezoning. List all conditions on the development plan and include the case number on all plans. SUBMITTAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN IS REQUIRED. |
| 09/04/2002 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ENGINEERING | Denied | DATE: August 30, 2002 TO: Craig Gross FROM: Laith Alshami CDRC Engineering – Development Review SUBJECT: D02-0022, Ft. Lowell Office Building Sec. 34, T13S, R14E, Ward 2 RECEIVED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement on August 09, 2002 The subject submittal is currently being reviewed as a rezoning case. Submitted Development Plan can not be reviewed until rezoning conditions have been established and adopted by Mayor and Council. LFA:lfa S:\Engineering\D02-0022 Ft. Lowell Office Building DP and DS comments.doc |
| 09/05/2002 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends approval of this development plan. |
| 09/12/2002 | GLENN HICKS | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: August 22, 2002 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Senior Planner, Parks and Recreation RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project D02-0022, Ft Lowell Office bldg CC: Craig Gross, Development Services Gary Wittwer Staff has reviewed and approved plans. |
| 09/24/2002 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 September 16, 2002 TO: Andrew Urban, Swaim Associates THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions SUBJECT: Ft. Lowell Office Building Development Plan D02-022 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. 2. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection rates. 3. Add the Development Plan case number, D02-022, to the plan. 4. Show the proposed and existing number of Wastewater Fixture Units in the General Notes. Based on that number, a Sewer Service Agreement will be prepared for this project, if required. The signed Sewer Service Agreements should be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Development Plan. 5. To make the General Notes reflect the current conditions, replace Note #10 with the following wording: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS ARE PUBLIC AND EXISTING. 6. Show the HCS. Label it as existing or proposed, and indicate its size. 7. Show and label the existing public sewer line in Ft. Lowell Road (G-182, 8"). 8. Label the existing sewer line that crosses the property ( G-86-065 8"). 9. Label that portion of existing sewer line (I-62-076, 8") that lies on the property. 10. Show the proposed rim elevations for all of the manholes on the site. Any re-paving of the parking lot must be such that it does not cause the manholes to be located in low-lying areas where rainwater runoff may enter the public sewer system. 11. Show the boundaries of the existing public sewer easement using dashed lines. Label the existing public sewer easement as follows, with the blanks filled in FT. PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT DKT , PAGE 12. The development plan shows one manhole in a raised section of concrete sidewalk. This is unacceptable as PCWWM must have full vehicular access to all of the manholes in the public sewer lines crossing this property. (I.e., PCWWM must be able to position their large and heavy maintenance vehicles directly over each manhole, without having to jump any curbing.) Revise as necessary. 13. We will require a Revised Development Plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact Tim Rowe at 740-6563. Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions SR/TR/dk Copy: Project |
| 09/27/2002 | JIM EGAN | CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD | FIRE | Approved | 08/12/02 The Development Plan is approved. Jim Egan |
| 10/10/2002 | CDRC Review Process | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Case Number: D02-0022 Project Name: Ft Lowell Office Building Estimated Traffic Generation: 147 trips If you have any questions or need more information, please contact me. Sandy White Research & Statistical Analyst Pima Association of Governments ph: 520-792-1093 x108 fax: 520-792-9151 swhite@pagnet.org |