Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D02-0021
Parcel: 127040010

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: CDRC RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D02-0021
Review Name: CDRC RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/23/2002 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START INITIALIZE THE WORKFLOW Completed
07/30/2002 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
James L. Larson
D02-0021
OREGANO'S PIZZA BISTRO
07/30/2002 JIM EGAN CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD FIRE Approved COMMENTS IN FILE
08/07/2002 CDRC Review Process DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING - DEV REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Peter McLaughlin FOR: Patricia Gehlen


PROJECT:
D02-021
Oregano's Restaurant
Remodel/Expansion

TRANSMITTAL: August 13, 2002
DUE DATE: August 13, 2002


1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 22, 2003.

2. This project must be reviewed as a development plan and must meet the criteria of DS2-05. Remove all references to "site plan" on the drawing and replace with "development plan". Place the development plan number (D02-021) and rezoning case number (C9-01-24) on each sheet of development plan and landscape plan, in the lower right hand corner near the title block.
DS 2-05.2.1.K

3. Provide a percent lot area expansion on the development plan. This appears to be a greater than 25% lot area expansion and a greater than 25% vehicle use area expansion, therefore full code compliance is required for this project.

4. Because the legal description calls out a portion of lot 2, please provide lot split documentation or a 20-year history of the property. Because the project area is made up of two separate parcels a lot combination is required prior to the approval of the development plan. Please provide the following documentation to the Zoning Review Section for review: a signed and recorded covenant (copy attached to the review comments), and approved Pima County Tax Combination Form.

5. Provide the zoning classifications for adjacent properties on the drawing.
DS 2-05.2.4.B

6. Please add all calculations to the development plan, including a floor area ratio (F.A.R.) calculation, loading zone calculation and a bicycle parking calculation.
DS 2-05

7. Revise vehicle parking calculation to be based solely on the principal use.
LUC 3.3.4

8. All conditions of rezoning as adopted by Mayor and Council for case C9-81-60 must be listed on the development plan. Also, demonstrate compliance (graphically or by notes) with all applicable rezoning conditions.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.2
DS 2-05.2.4.U

9. Provide the dimensions of the building.
DS 2-05.2.4.N

10. Add future and existing sight visibility triangles for the intersection of Speedway Blvd and Arcadia Ave.
DS 2-05.2.4.R

11. If any new freestanding lighting is proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type.
DS 2-05.2.4.U

12. If any new freestanding signs are proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type.
DS 2-05.2.4.W

13. Dimension the wheelstops from the front of parking spaces and dimension the vehicle overhang for the vehicle spaces along the east property line. Wheelstops must located 2-12 feet from front of parking spaces. A minimum of 2-1/2 feet is required for vehicle overhang to prevent vehicles from overhanging property lines or damaging landscaping, buildings and walls. For the four vehicle spaces which abut the south wall, please revise distance between front of spaces and the block wall to be a minimum of 2-12 feet, or provide wheelstop curbing in these spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C

14. In the general notes provide the development designator "30" for the food service use in the C-2 zone.
LUC 2.5.4.2.A.12

15. Add a general note which details "subject to" restrictions found in LUC 3.5.4.6.C and 3.5.13.5 as applicable in the C-2 zone for the food service use.
LUC 2.5.4.2.A.12

16. Provide a bicycle parking calculation (see comment 5). It is not clear where bicycle parking is to be located. Show the location of class 2 bicycle parking and provide a detail, fully dimensioned per DS 2-09. DS 2-09
DS 2-05.2.4.Q

17. Provide a loading zone calc (see comment 5). The loading zone must be dimensioned at 15'× 35'. The standard parking space dimensions shown for the proposed loading zone are not sufficient.
DS 3-05.2.O
LUC 3.4.5.1

18. Dimension the distance between the building and the property lines.
DS 2-05.2.4.I

19. Add a general note stating that the project is designed to meet LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R ) Setback Zone.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.10

20. Pedestrian circulation must meet the design criteria in Development Standards 2-08.0. Continuous on-site pedestrian circulation must be provided from First Street to the buildings per DS 2-08.

21. For legibility and microfilming purposes all lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 0.12 point or greater in size. The drawing is difficult to read. Further comments may be necessary after the lettering is enlarged. DS 2-05.2.1.C

22. All requested changes must be made to the development plan and landscape
plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
08/07/2002 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied COMMENTS ON FILE
08/07/2002 CDRC Review Process DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING - DEV REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Comments, 08/07/2002

Drainage Report:

1- The submitted drainage information and Floodplain Use Permit do not address the proposed improvements. Submit a drainage report which addresses onsite and offsite runoff, detention/retention, erosion setback, encroachment and existing and future drainage patterns. The drainage report should include the detention/retention basin maintenance check list.
2- submit a percolation test which demonstrates that percolation rate within the retention basin is acceptable.
3- It appears that a Floodplain Use Permit (FUP) will be required for the proposed improvements. There is a $150.00 fee for the drainage report review and a $50.00 fee for the FUP application.


Development Plan:

The submitted plan does not qualify as a development plan. Revise the plan according to the following comments:

1- All lettering and dimensions shall be equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or grater in size (D.S. 2-05.2.1.C)
2- The location map shall conform to the requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.
3- Provide a Title Block that conforms to the requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.G.
4- According to D.S. D.S. 2-05.2.1.H. & I., it is preferable to have the north arrow and the plan drawing be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet.
5- Provide a legend which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing (D.S. 2-05.2.1.J.)
6- List all applicable rezoning, annexation or subdivision case numbers as required by D.S. 2-05.2.1.K.
7- Provide rezoning information as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2.
8- List all applicable drainage notesas required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.C.1. & 2.
9- List all applicable Streets and Roads Notes stated in D.S. 2-05.2.2.D.2.
10- List all applicable Utility Notes stated in D.S. 2-05.2.2.E.
11- List all applicable Wastewater Management Notes stated in D.S. 2-05.2.2.F.
12- It is not clear what is existing and what is being proposed. It appears that the submitted plan was prepared for previous improvements. Revise the plan according to the requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.3. and D.S. 2-05.2.4.
13- Show drainage patterns by providing drainage arrows and existing and proposed spot elevations.
14- Clarify what separates the proposed parking spaces from the proposed detention/retention basin, and lanndscape areas.
15- Provide drainage information as required by D.S. 2-05.2.4.H. Please include the detention basin construction details such as dimensions, slopes, and the need for security barriers.
16- Provide the detention/retention maintenance note and maintenance check list as required by Section 14.3 of the Standard Manual for Drainage Design in Floodplain Management In Tucson, Arizona.
17- Dumpster enclosure must comply with the requirements of D.S. 6-01.4.2.
18- Provide sight visibility triangles (SVT) as required by D.S. 3-01.5.1. The SVT's should be dimensioned.
08/07/2002 CDRC Review Process CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D02-0021 Oregano’s Pizza Bistro 7/24/02

() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-01-24 Oregano’s Speedway Boulevard

AREA PLAN: Broadway - Craycroft

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO

COMMENTS DUE BY: August 13, 2002

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(X) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(X) Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: msp DATE: July 29, 2002

Community Planning and Preservation Comments
D-2-0021 Oregano’s Pizza Bistro
July 29, 2002

The subject property was rezoned from R-2 to P, on January 7, 2002, and is subject to rezoning conditions 1 through 20 of rezoning case C9-01-24. As submitted, the proposed development plan D02- 0021, is not in compliance with rezoning conditions number 1., 1.a., and 17. Please revise the proposed development on the following points.

1. Revise proposed development plan to include as general notes rezoning conditions 1 through 20, of rezoning case C9-01-24. Use same language and format as shown on Ordinance NO. 9649 (See attached copy).

2. Revise proposed development plan to identify subject site with no access to First Street except for an opaque emergency gate. Identify rear entrance for emergency use only.

3. Revise proposed development plan to include an elevation drawing of the required opaque emergency gate. Identify material and color used to meet the opaque requirement.

4. Revised proposed development plan to be in compliance with rezoning condition number 17. Identify location of physical barrier on the development plan and provide written approval from the Police Department that the physical barrier design is approved as a “safe by design” concept.
08/13/2002 CDRC Review Process DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Peter McLaughlin FOR: Patricia Gehlen


PROJECT:
D02-021
Oregano's Restaurant
Remodel/Expansion

TRANSMITTAL: August 13, 2002
DUE DATE: August 13, 2002


1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 22, 2003.

2. This project must be reviewed as a development plan and must meet the criteria of DS2-05. Remove all references to "site plan" on the drawing and replace with "development plan". Place the development plan number (D02-021) and rezoning case number (C9-01-24) on each sheet of development plan and landscape plan, in the lower right hand corner near the title block.
DS 2-05.2.1.K

3. Provide a percent lot area expansion on the development plan. This appears to be a greater than 25% lot area expansion and a greater than 25% vehicle use area expansion, therefore full code compliance is required for this project.

4. Because the legal description calls out a portion of lot 2, please provide lot split documentation or a 20-year history of the property. Because the project area is made up of two separate parcels a lot combination is required prior to the approval of the development plan. Please provide the following documentation to the Zoning Review Section for review: a signed and recorded covenant (copy attached to the review comments), and approved Pima County Tax Combination Form.

5. Provide the zoning classifications for adjacent properties on the drawing.
DS 2-05.2.4.B

6. Please add all calculations to the development plan, including a floor area ratio (F.A.R.) calculation, loading zone calculation and a bicycle parking calculation.
DS 2-05

7. Revise vehicle parking calculation to be based solely on the principal use.
LUC 3.3.4

8. All conditions of rezoning as adopted by Mayor and Council for case C9-81-60 must be listed on the development plan. Also, demonstrate compliance (graphically or by notes) with all applicable rezoning conditions.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.2
DS 2-05.2.4.U

9. Provide the dimensions of the building.
DS 2-05.2.4.N

10. Add future and existing sight visibility triangles for the intersection of Speedway Blvd and Arcadia Ave.
DS 2-05.2.4.R

11. If any new freestanding lighting is proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type.
DS 2-05.2.4.U

12. If any new freestanding signs are proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type.
DS 2-05.2.4.W

13. Dimension the wheelstops from the front of parking spaces and dimension the vehicle overhang for the vehicle spaces along the east property line. Wheelstops must located 2-12 feet from front of parking spaces. A minimum of 2-1/2 feet is required for vehicle overhang to prevent vehicles from overhanging property lines or damaging landscaping, buildings and walls. For the four vehicle spaces which abut the south wall, please revise distance between front of spaces and the block wall to be a minimum of 2-12 feet, or provide wheelstop curbing in these spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C

14. In the general notes provide the development designator "30" for the food service use in the C-2 zone.
LUC 2.5.4.2.A.12

15. Add a general note which details "subject to" restrictions found in LUC 3.5.4.6.C and 3.5.13.5 as applicable in the C-2 zone for the food service use.
LUC 2.5.4.2.A.12

16. Provide a bicycle parking calculation (see comment 5). It is not clear where bicycle parking is to be located. Show the location of class 2 bicycle parking and provide a detail, fully dimensioned per DS 2-09. DS 2-09
DS 2-05.2.4.Q

17. Provide a loading zone calc (see comment 5). The loading zone must be dimensioned at 15'× 35'. The standard parking space dimensions shown for the proposed loading zone are not sufficient.
DS 3-05.2.O
LUC 3.4.5.1

18. Dimension the distance between the building and the property lines.
DS 2-05.2.4.I

19. Add a general note stating that the project is designed to meet LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R ) Setback Zone.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.10

20. Pedestrian circulation must meet the design criteria in Development Standards 2-08.0. Continuous on-site pedestrian circulation must be provided from First Street to the buildings per DS 2-08.

21. For legibility and microfilming purposes all lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 0.12 point or greater in size. The drawing is difficult to read. Further comments may be necessary after the lettering is enlarged. DS 2-05.2.1.C

22. All requested changes must be made to the development plan and landscape
plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
08/14/2002 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved COMMENTS OF FILE
08/14/2002 ZELIN CANCHOLA CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD ENGINEERING - TRAFFIC Denied COMMENTS OF FILE
08/14/2002 CDRC Review Process OTHER AGENCIES REAL ESTATE Denied Legal descriptions for right of way have been received and are being forwarded to Engineering for review. Please submit a title report dated within 30 days on the subject property for document preparation.
08/14/2002 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Case Number: D02-0021
Project Name: Oregano's Pizza Bistro
Estimated Traffic Generation: 0 trips

If you have any questions or need more information, please contact me.

Sandy White
Research & Statistical Analyst
Pima Association of Governments
ph: 520-792-1093 x108
fax: 520-792-9151
swhite@pagnet.org
08/15/2002 JOE LINVILLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LANDSCAPE Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Peter McLaughlin FOR: Patricia Gehlen


PROJECT:
D02-021
Oregano's Restaurant
Remodel/Expansion

TRANSMITTAL: August 13, 2002
DUE DATE: August 13, 2002


1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 22, 2003.

2. This project must be reviewed as a development plan and must meet the criteria of DS2-05. Remove all references to "site plan" on the drawing and replace with "development plan". Place the development plan number (D02-021) and rezoning case number (C9-01-24) on each sheet of development plan and landscape plan, in the lower right hand corner near the title block.
DS 2-05.2.1.K

3. Provide a percent lot area expansion on the development plan. This appears to be a greater than 25% lot area expansion and a greater than 25% vehicle use area expansion, therefore full code compliance is required for this project.

4. Because the legal description calls out a portion of lot 2, please provide lot split documentation or a 20-year history of the property. Because the project area is made up of two separate parcels a lot combination is required prior to the approval of the development plan. Please provide the following documentation to the Zoning Review Section for review: a signed and recorded covenant (copy attached to the review comments), and approved Pima County Tax Combination Form.

5. Provide the zoning classifications for adjacent properties on the drawing.
DS 2-05.2.4.B

6. Please add all calculations to the development plan, including a floor area ratio (F.A.R.) calculation, loading zone calculation and a bicycle parking calculation.
DS 2-05

7. Revise vehicle parking calculation to be based solely on the principal use.
LUC 3.3.4

8. All conditions of rezoning as adopted by Mayor and Council for case C9-81-60 must be listed on the development plan. Also, demonstrate compliance (graphically or by notes) with all applicable rezoning conditions.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.2
DS 2-05.2.4.U

9. Provide the dimensions of the building.
DS 2-05.2.4.N

10. Add future and existing sight visibility triangles for the intersection of Speedway Blvd and Arcadia Ave.
DS 2-05.2.4.R

11. If any new freestanding lighting is proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type.
DS 2-05.2.4.U

12. If any new freestanding signs are proposed as part of this development, indicate location and type.
DS 2-05.2.4.W

13. Dimension the wheelstops from the front of parking spaces and dimension the vehicle overhang for the vehicle spaces along the east property line. Wheelstops must located 2-12 feet from front of parking spaces. A minimum of 2-1/2 feet is required for vehicle overhang to prevent vehicles from overhanging property lines or damaging landscaping, buildings and walls. For the four vehicle spaces which abut the south wall, please revise distance between front of spaces and the block wall to be a minimum of 2-12 feet, or provide wheelstop curbing in these spaces. DS 3-05.2.3.C

14. In the general notes provide the development designator "30" for the food service use in the C-2 zone.
LUC 2.5.4.2.A.12

15. Add a general note which details "subject to" restrictions found in LUC 3.5.4.6.C and 3.5.13.5 as applicable in the C-2 zone for the food service use.
LUC 2.5.4.2.A.12

16. Provide a bicycle parking calculation (see comment 5). It is not clear where bicycle parking is to be located. Show the location of class 2 bicycle parking and provide a detail, fully dimensioned per DS 2-09. DS 2-09
DS 2-05.2.4.Q

17. Provide a loading zone calc (see comment 5). The loading zone must be dimensioned at 15'× 35'. The standard parking space dimensions shown for the proposed loading zone are not sufficient.
DS 3-05.2.O
LUC 3.4.5.1

18. Dimension the distance between the building and the property lines.
DS 2-05.2.4.I

19. Add a general note stating that the project is designed to meet LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R ) Setback Zone.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.10

20. Pedestrian circulation must meet the design criteria in Development Standards 2-08.0. Continuous on-site pedestrian circulation must be provided from First Street to the buildings per DS 2-08.

21. For legibility and microfilming purposes all lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 0.12 point or greater in size. The drawing is difficult to read. Further comments may be necessary after the lettering is enlarged. DS 2-05.2.1.C

22. All requested changes must be made to the development plan and landscape
plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
08/15/2002 JOE LINVILLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES LANDSCAPE Denied THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF WATERCOURSE AMENITIES, SAFETY AND HABITAT ORDINANCE. PROVIDE A DETAILED PLANT/HABITAT INVENTORY PER SEC. 29-15.2

ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE A MIN. 5 FOOT HIGH MASONRY WALL IS REQUIRED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH LUC 3.7.3 SCREENING REGULATIONS. IDENTIFY THE REQUIRED SCREENING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
PER REZONING CONDITION (10) THE WALL MUST INCORPORATE DECORATIVE MATERIALS. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE MATERIALS USED. ALL SCREEN WALLS MUST ALSO INCORPORATE GRAFFITI RESISTANT MATERIALS OR TREATMENTS. NOTE THIS REQUIREMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITION OF REZONING ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE
SCREENING FOR THE SITE MUST REFLECT A UNIFIED THEME. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL THAT EXPLAIN HOW THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED. C9-01-24

AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE BORDER IS REQUIRED ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. LUC 3.7.2.4

THE PLAN MUST INCLUDE DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE STREET LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ALONG SPEEDWAY BOULEVARD. THE LANDSCAPE BORDER IS BASED ON THE MS&R RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND MUST BE A MINIMUM OF TEN FEET IN WIDTH AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 50% VEGETATIVE COVERAGE. DIMENSION THE REQUIRED BORDER AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO MEET THE COVERAGE REQUIREMENT. PROVIDE ONE CANOPY TREE FOR EVERY 33 FEET OF FRONTAGE ALONG THE STREET. LUC 3.7.2.4, DS 2-07.2.2

IDENTIFY ALL EXISTING PLANTS BY GENUS AND SPECIES. DS 2-07.2.2

A MINIMUM 30 INCH HIGH SCREEN IS REQUIRED ALONG THE DEVELOPMENT SIDE OF THE LANDSCAPE BORDER BETWEEN THE VEHICULAR USE AND OTHER USES AND THE LANDSCAPE BORDER. THE BUILDING MAY SERVE AS THE REQUIRED SCREEN FOR A PORTION OF THE FRONTAGE IF NO OTHER USES ARE LOCATED BETWEEN THE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE AREA IS LANDSCAPED TO PROVIDE 50% VEGETATIVE COVERAGE.
REVISE THE PLAN TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SCREENING. LUC 3.7.3

DIMENSION THE FIRST ST. LANDSCAPE BORDER ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL IS REQUIRED TO LOCATE A PORTION OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BORDER WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY AREA.
PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THE REQUIRED APPROVAL IF GRANTED.

SCREENS MAY ONLY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE BORDER AS ALLOWED UNDER LUC 3.7.3.2.C.1. IDENTIFY ALL SCREENING ELEMENTS ON THE PLANS.

PARKING AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS IS NOT ALLOWED WITHIN SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLES ALONG SPEEDWAY BOULEVARD.

PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE SITE WALL BENCH INDICATED ON THE PLANS. DS 2-07.2.2

THE REQUIREMENTS OF LUC 3.8 NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION APPLY TO THE SITE. THE APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION RECEIVED IS IN ERROR AND IS NOT APPROVED. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INDICATES A PROTECTED PLANT PER LUC 3.8.5. AERIAL PHOTOS (PIMA COUNTY 1998) OF THE SITE ALSO INDICATE THE PRESENCE OF ADDITIONAL PLANTS OF UNKNOWN SPECIES. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EXCEPTIONS INCLUDE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE AND OTHER INFORMATION THAT MAY BE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE THAT PROTECTED NATIVE PLANTS WILL NOT BE IMPACTED. DS 2-15.0
08/26/2002 GLENN HICKS CITY OF TUCSON - NOT DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: July 22, 2002

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Senior Planner, Parks and Recreation

RE: CDRC Transmittal, Project D02-0021 Oregano’s Pizza


CC: Craig Gross, Development Services


Staff has reviewed and approved.
09/04/2002 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied August 30, 2002

TO: James Larson, Larson Associates

THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services

FROM: Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager
Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions

SUBJECT: Oregano’s Pizza Bistro
Development Plan
D02-0021



We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use:

1. There is currently capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date.

2. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection rates.

3. Show the proposed and existing number of Wastewater Fixture Units in the General Notes. Based on that number, a Sewer Service Agreement will be prepared for this project, if required. The signed Sewer Service Agreements should be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Development Plan.

4. Add the Development Plan case number, D02-0021, to each sheet.

5. Label the existing off-site public sewers to the north, south and east, with plan number and size. Label the existing manholes, each side of the point of connection, with rim and invert elevations.


6. Label the proposed HCS connection (identify the size, public or private, new or existing, etc.)
7. Provide the township, range and section on your vicinity map.

8. This submittal is incomplete. Please obtain a copy of the Development Plan requirements and revise accordingly. Provide the required General and Permitting Notes.

9. Be advised, there may be additional comments, and or corrections, on the next submittal of this Development Plan .

If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact Tim Rowe at 740-6563.




Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager
Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions


SR/DK/dk