Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D02-0019
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2003 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/10/2003 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A Floodplain Use Permit is required. This site is in a FEMA floodplain as per Matt Flick. 2. I understand that FEMA has a Drainage Report for its investigation of a CLOMR. Submit a Drainage Report for review my Engineering/Floodplain review. 3. A grading permit is required. Submit a Grading Plan for review. |
| 02/13/2003 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO : CITY PLANNING FROM : KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT : D02-0019 WALGREENS ALVERNON WY/GRANT RD/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE : February 10, 2003 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/ addressing, and we hereby approve this project. APPROVED EXCEPT: ON FINAL MYLAR EITHER DELETE REFERENCE TO 42-43 ON LOCATION PLAN OR CORRECT TO 52-80 AND 50-04. NOTE: 1. Submit a 24 x 36 Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to the assignment of addresses. 2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 02/13/2003 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TASK FORCE COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D02-0019 Walgreens - Alvernon Way/Grant Rd. 02/10/03 ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-06 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: February 17, 2003 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 7/24/02 ( ) No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall DATE: 2/10/03 COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D02-0019 Walgreens - Alvernon Way/Grant Rd. 07/24/02 ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-06 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: August 1, 2002 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall DATE: 7-22-02 Community Planning and Preservation Comments Walgreens - Alvernon Way/Grant Rd, D02-0019 The applicant’s request to rezone the property located at the northwest corner of Alvernon Way / Grant Road that was approved by Mayor and Council is subject to meeting certain rezoning conditions. The development plan does not show that all on-site lighting shall be no higher than 16’, measure to light source, within 50’ of the north property line. Please provide a note stating compliance with this rezoning condition in the General Notes section and/or indicate compliance on development plan by showing the location and height for all on-site lighting. (Rezoning condition no.2) It appears in the development plan that there is adequate room to open up vehicular and pedestrian connectivity to the commercial development at the intersection of Grant Road and Alvernon Way. The site design appears that it could accommodate such a design modification for vehicular and pedestrian connectivity through the north and west walls of the adjacent commercial development to the southeast. Please indicate in General Notes and/or on development plan compliance with this rezoning condition. (Rezoning condition no. 9) Provide a pedestrian table crossing Haskell Drive and connecting with the on-site pedestrian system, or provide in General Notes reference to a letter from Traffic Engineering Section that this would not be an appropriate design at this location, (Rezoning condition no. 10) Defer to Traffic Engineering for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 12, 13, 14, 15. Defer to Floodplain Engineering for comments and compliance of the following rezoning conditions: 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. Defer to Tucson Police Department for comments and compliance of the following rezoning condition: 30. The development plan, C-4.1 and C-4.2 section details, does not appear to indicate that walls constructed on the north property boundary have weep holes large enough to allow unrestricted flows through the site. Please provide a reference to such design in the section details. (Rezoning condition no. 24) Provide building elevations which depict that architectural design of the north and west sides of the building are commensurate with the south and east sides of the building. (Rezoning condition no. 25) Provide and identify on the development plan raised or textured crosswalks in all locations where the pedestrian system crosses PAAL’s, including from the parking lot to the entrance of the building. (Rezoning condition no. 26) Although the development plan provides sectional detail of north perimeter wall, graffiti-resistant material needs to be identified in the notes, and on development plan need to provide sectional detail for other perimeter walls. (Rezoning condition, no 27 – 28) |
| 02/14/2003 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The following comments from the previous review have not been addressed successfully: 1) "Per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2 "Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets." Provide verification of the required City Engineer approval." [ Provide documentation, in writing, of any approvals received] 2) "Per LUC 3.7.3.2.C.3 "Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border." Revise the plans to limit the wall encroachment in to the street landscape borders to the extent allowed by the LUC." [Revise the wall location and other features necessary along Haskell Drive to comply] Resubmittal of the Development Plan and the Landscape Plan is required. |
| 02/19/2003 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval for this DP. 1. Show SVT's for the property access points on Haskell Drive. 2. Show both existing and future SVT's on Alvernon Way and Grant Road at Haskell Drive. 3. Show dimensions on all SVT's. 4. The pork chop at the Alvernon entrance is insufficiently designed to have the desired effect of precluding left turn movements. The pork chop should have an outside radius of 44'. This will allow for a 16' wide turning lane through the ingress/egress point. The face of the pork chop should be in line with the existing curb line on Alvernon Way. This results in a curb facing of +/- 20' along Alvernon. 5. Add "RIGHT TURN ONLY" sign (R3-5R) to Stop sign post at Alvernon egress. 6. The symbol for proposed signs is incorrect per SD100 as indicated in the legend nor does it match the symbols for proposed signs on sheet C-1.2. The symbol on sheet C-1.2 is correct. 7. There are two different symbols for SVT's in the legend with the same call out. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dkelch1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 02/26/2003 | FRODRIG2 | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera FOR: Patricia Gehlen Senior Planner Principal Planner PROJECT: D02-0019 Walgreen’s Alvernon Way and Grant Road Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: February 14, 2002 Retail Use: General Merchandise (First review) DUE DATE: February 17, 2002 COMMENTS: Please feel free to call me to discuss any questions regarding Zoning comments or if you would like to see me and discuss this project please call me to set up an appointment. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 1, 2003. 2. Please ensure that the recordation information is added to the plans prior to submittal of the final Mylar copy for stamps and signatures. (Previous Comment: All easement recordation information (Docket and Page numbers) for proposed and existing easements must be listed prior to final approval of the development plan. If applicable, any existing easements, which may be proposed for abandonment or relocation, must be shown and labeled. The recordation information must be listed for each abandoned or relocated easement. DS 2-05.2.3.B 3. Please ensure that the recordation information is added to the plans prior to submittal of the final Mylar copy for stamps and signatures. (Previous Comment: Upon approval and recordation of the right-of-way, please add the docket and page numbers to the development plan. The development plan cannot be approved until all easements and right-of-way recordation has been completed. The recordation information must be listed on the plan and copies of the documents must be provided with the development plan submittal. DS 2-05.2.4.E DS 2-05.2.4.G 4. The sidewalk that was relocated away from the loading area must be constructed in a manner that physically separates the PAAL and sidewalk (the portion of the sidewalk that runs parallel to the landscape island). Sidewalks or portions of the pedestrian circulation may be flush with the pavement or PAAL at crosswalk locations only. The raised portion must be H.C. accessible. Revise the portion of the sidewalk as required. (Previous Comment: Per DS 2-08.4.1.A, at least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. A sidewalk must be provided from the Grant Road right-of-way frontage to the site and must connect to the onsite pedestrian circulation path (sidewalk). Per DS 2-08.4.1.F, Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas may not be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space. For the safety of the pedestrians and compliance with the development standards noted above, the crosswalk next to the loading zone must be relocated. The sidewalk along the east side of the building is dimensioned at seven (7) feet in width. Please provide a detail drawing at a larger scale with dimensions of this sidewalk and column area. Please ensure that the sidewalk area between the column and the wall of the building or the edge of the sidewalk and the column is not reduced to less than the required width of four (4) feet. DS 2-05.2.4.K 5. With the proposed angle (60 degrees) for the angled parking spaces The 17 feet dimension must be no less than 19 feet 8 inches. Please revise the parking to meet the criteria in LUC section 3.3.7.2, see detail and vehicle areas dimensions matrix 3.3.7.I, 60 degree parking. Compact parking spaces are not allowed except within the downtown area. Revise as required. (Previous Comment: Please, label the degree of angle for the parking spaces along the north side of the property. DS 2-05.2.4.P 6. For consistency, please ensure that all changes that are made to the development plan sheets are made to the corresponding landscape sheets. 7. (Previous Comment 14. Please provide a response memo that how all rezoning conditions have addressed and how they comply. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the response comments. Provide additional drawings as reference that demonstrate how some conditions such as 2, 25, 26 and 27 have been addressed. DS 2-05.2.4.U 8. (Previous Comment 15. If possible please add a separate plan sheet that shows the proposed development without all the existing information such as existing structures. (Previous Comment 16. A parcel tax code combo and lot combo covenant is also required prior to approval of the development plan. The parcel tax code combo is processed through the Pima County Assessor’s Office and the lot combo covenant required by the City Attorney’s Office must be filed and recorded through the Pima County Recorder’s Office. The Lot Combo Covenant form can be downloaded from the DSD web site. If you have any questions regarding this comment feel free to contact me. Previous comments 14-16 dated July 30, 2002 were not addressed. The comments have been added to this memo as 7, 8, and 9. The outline of the tower and façade should be shown unless construction is not proposed at this time. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D020019dp2.doc |
| 02/26/2003 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 3950 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Telephone: 520-884-3879 Fax: 520-770-2002 WR#90958 February 20, 2003 Mr. Steve Wollerman Tetra Tech, Inc. 33 N. Stone Avenue, 15th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 Dear Mr. Wollerman: SUBJECT: Walgreens – Alvernon Way & Grant Road D02-0019 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the revised Development Plan dated July, 2002. The TEP Design Builder for this project and the customer have reached an understanding as to the disposition of the existing facilities. Please submit a final set of plans including electrical load plans, to determine how TEP will serve this commercial development. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Marcus Hayes Distribution Services – WI101 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 884-3879, should you have any questions. Sincerely, S. Glynda Rothwell Right-of-Way Agent Land Management sgr cc: C. Gross, City of Tucson |
| 02/26/2003 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 CARMINE DEBONIS, JR. Phone: (520) 740-6586 Director FAX: (520) 740-6380 February 27, 2003 TO: Steve Wollerman, Tetra Tech THRU: Craig Gross, City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Subhash Raval, P.E., Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions SUBJECT: Walgreens - Alvernon Way & Grant Road Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D02-019 We have reviewed the above-referenced project on behalf of the Pima County Wastewater Management Department. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Pima County Wastewater Management Department hereby approves the above-referenced Development Plan as submitted. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact Debbie Ketchem at 740-6404. Subhash Raval, P.E., Division Manager Pima County Development Review & Technical Services Divisions SR/DK/dk Copy: Project |