Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D02-0013
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/19/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
10/19/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The revised Development Plan is approved October 19, 2004. |
10/26/2004 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Plan mentioned 10 x 10 enclosure. The 10 x 10 area should be the clear area between the bollards inside the enclosure. * No detail for the enclosure shown. Enclosure called out in the Development Standards specifies the 10 feet clear area, doors and a 10 foot concrete slab in front of the enclosure. * The west enclosure of the two enclosures west of building one has a conflict for service. The collection vehicle is unable to be positioned in the required 14 foot by 40 foot required clear area in front of the enclosure. If this enclosure is positioned at a 30 Degree angle to the PAAL the enclosure clear area would not be in conflict and could be serviced. |
11/01/2004 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D02-0013 5th & Wilmot Corporate Offices 11/01/04 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-00-19, C12-75-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Sewell-Hudlow Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: November 7, 2002 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: October 11, 2002 |
11/02/2004 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this revised DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
11/04/2004 | ELAINE ROSE | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: Patricia Gehlen Principal Planner PROJECT: D02-013 5th & Wilmot Corporate Offices Development Plan revisions TRANSMITTAL: November 4, 2004 DUE DATE: November 2, 2004 1. Revise the bicycle parking calculation to be based on the vehicle parking provided rather than that required. Eight percent of 511 equals 41 bicycle parking spaces required. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 2. Add the dimensions and height of the garage along with the MS&R building setback for the garage (dimensioned from back of curb location) from 5th Street. DS 2-05.2.4.I If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
12/23/2004 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
12/23/2004 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Threshold Retention Although the site is not in a designated balanced or critical basin, the site is subject to threshold retention since it is a commercial site greater than 1 acre. Demonstrate compliance with threeshold retention requirements. |