Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D01-0013
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/12/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/18/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Subject to acceptance by the City Engineer to continue to allow a portion of the landscape border in the public right-of-way along the central parking area . Provide verification of approval. |
| 08/09/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * Enclosure already built in 2001. * Approved as is due to construction. |
| 08/10/2006 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 10, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of North Tucson Business Center - Development Plan TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 3745 E I-10 Frontage Road, T13S R13E Sec33, Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D01-0013 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised development plan addendum, drainage report, landscape plan, cross access agreements, and the original development plan, Sheets 1 thru 2, and does not recommend approval of the development plan addendum at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) DS Sec. 10-02.14.5.8: Dry wells are highly discouraged due to their high failure rates, in order to help ensure that this exiting dry well functions now and in the future provide percolation test results to verify performance of the existing dry well. During the percolation test, the dry well shall be filled with clean water until the rate of inflow and the percolation rate have stabilized for a period of one hour. 2) Revise the drainage report and any necessary changes to the development plan to show that the post developed discharge (Q100) is less than the existing Q100 discharge value. Review of the hydrology calculation sheet in Appendix #4 shows that the post developed Q100 is greater than the existing Q100. Provide water harvesting areas that will contain the excess runoff. Consult the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual (Adopted October 18, 2005) for design guidelines. The manual is available online at http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/downloads/2006WaterHarvesting.pdf. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: DS Sec.3-05.2.2.2.D: Revise the back-up spur provided at the end of the PAAL adjacent to the detention/retention basin. The spur must be a minimum of 3 feet in depth with a 3-foot radii, but must also provide a minimum of 3 feet between the back of spur and any wall obstruction that is over 6 inches in height. GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide a revised development plan addendum and a revised drainage report at re-submittal. The revised development plan and drainage report must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. If you have any questions, or to schedule an appointment, I can be reached at 791-5550, extension 1189. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 08/30/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D01-0013 North Tucson Business Center Development Plan Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 13, 2006 DUE DATE: August 9, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Place the development plan number (D01-013) along with the applicable rezoning case number (C9-79-37) on each sheet of the Landscape Plan in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K 2. Per the revised off-street loading calculations on sheet 1 of 2 three (3) are required and seven (7) ? are provided. If this is correct please identify the location of all loading spaces on the DP clearly. One (1) space is shown on the landscape plan. The calculation should reflect what is required for this project. If the number of spaces are overall to the complex then that should be stated. 3. Until the off-street loading spaces are clearly shown on the DP the following comment cannot be removed. (The pedestrian sidewalk must be revised so as not to pass behind the loading zone for safety reasons. Or revise the location of the loading zone so that trucks can maneuver safely.) DS 2-05.2.4.O 4. Is the provided number of motor vehicle parking spaces for the entire complex? What is the actual number of spaces being provided for this project? Please break down the calculations to reflect this. DS 2-05.2.4.P 5. Please make sure that the revised bicycle parking calculation on sheet DP-1is based on the project site as well as the total complex to match motor vehicle parking calculation format. DS 2-05.2.4.Q All calculations requested should be read easily. As the calculations are provided now staff cannot clearly see what is being removed or added, provided or existing. Further comments may be necessary once a revised development plan sheet DP-1 is submitted showing all corrected calculations. 6. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D01-0013dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 09/06/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 6, 2006 South Western Consulting Engineers LLC 435 East 9th Street Tucson, AZ 85705 Subject: D01-0013 North Tucson Business Center Lost 2 & 3 Revised Development Plan Dear Steve: Your submittal of July 13, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-1063 |