Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D00-0057
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/16/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved May 16, 2005. |
| 05/20/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D00-0057 TOTAL TOOL, INC.;/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 5/20/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add Township, Range to Location Map. Correct Progresso to Calle Progresso on Location Map. Add suffix to Fairview on Location Map. |
| 05/20/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/23/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Existing dumpster enclosure. Enclosure does not have side wall protection. (Request side wall protection if applicable.) * No provisions for recycling. |
| 05/26/2005 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: TOTAL TOOL, INC. D00-0057 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review May 13, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, depict the underground primary cable and easement recording information. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The underground primary cable located between transformer (GIC-13) and junction cabinet (GIC-12) should be located. The cable may be in conflict with the new additions. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 05/26/2005 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: May 26, 2005 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the New Addition to Total Tool: Development Plan. The activity number is D00-0057 SUMMARY: The Development Plan were received by Engineering on May 13th, 2005. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan DEVELOPMENT PLAN The next submittal must address the following items: 1. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. Revise the detatils, legend information and the location map (streets) to 12 point. DS 2-05.2.C. 2. The legend shows drainage arrows, however drainage arrows are not depicted on the Development Plan. Show the existing direction of drainage with the drainage symbol used in the legend. DS 2-05.2.1.J., DS 2-05.2.4.H.2. 3. Include the Development Plan number in the lower right hand corner, next to the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K. 4. Add the two following General Street and Road Notes: List the following note if applicable: "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." List the following note on all development plans: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0. |
| 05/26/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D00-0057 Total Tool Inc. 05/23/05 () Tentative Plat (xxxxx) Development Plan (Revision – core review) () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Unit 6 Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/27/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (xxxxx) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: vf 791-4505 DATE: 05/21/05 |
| 05/26/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit revised landscape plans. DS 2-05.3.1.C 2) Revise the landscape plans to show all required and existing landscape areas. Identify all plants by genus and species. 3) Show the landscape areas on the development plan, include dimensions. DS 2-05.2.4.X Resubmittal of all plans is required. |
| 05/26/2005 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Place the development plan number (D00-057) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K 2. Fill in the correct sheet number in the lower right-hand corner of the revised development plan. 3. Parking must be based on the principal use. If the principal use is machine shop (General Manufacturing), parking is required at the rate of 1 vehicle space per 500 square feet for the entire building GFA. 4. Add all details for wall, fence, sidewalk, dumpster enclosure, etc. that were included on the approved development plan. 5.Add to the drawing the adjacent zoning on all sides of the project site. DS 2-05.2.4.B 6. In the calculations state the class of bicycle parking provided and show the location of the bike parking on the drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 7. Add existing and future sight visibility triangles at the entrance ingress/egress to Grant Road. DS 2-05.2.4.I 8. Place the maximum slope of the handicap parking aisles and ramps on the drawing or on the h/c parking space detail. ANS / IBC 9. Add a general note stating that the proposal meets the criteria of LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets & Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. DS 2-05.2.B.10 10. Indicate the location, height, and dimensions of any freestanding signage or billoards. DS 2-05.2.4.W 11. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 06/01/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 31, 2005 TO: Rob Caylor Robert Caylor Construction Co. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Total Tool, Inc. Development Plan – 1st Submittal D00-0057 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Santa Cruz East Interceptor. Per PCWWM Planning Services, there is currently treatment and conveyance system capacity in the existing downstream sewerage system for this development. Flow from this proposed project would not cause any flow or effluent quality limits to be exceeded. This response is not to be construed as a commitment for treatment or conveyance capacity allocation, but rather an analysis of the existing sewerage system as of this date. Based on the evaluation of project C12-91-1, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. Add the project number, D05-0057, to the title block. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Delete General Note 8 as it is a duplicate of General Note 5. Add the following General Note MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. Show all the public sewer easements, along with their respective recording information and clearly show their boundaries. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/05/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 5, 2005 Rob Caylor Robert Caylor Construction Company 6711 East Camino Principal Tucson, AZ 85715 Subject: D00-0057 Total Tool, Inc. Development Plan Dear Rob: Your submittal of May 13, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (addressing, environmental services, waste water, TEP, engineering, zoning, landscaping, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (zoning, engineering, landscaping, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 290-6014 |