Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: PERMANENT SIGN REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TS-PRM-0825-00331
Review Name: PERMANENT SIGN REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/26/2025 | Commercial Building Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | COMMENTS: 1. I concur with Signs Standard comment by Tami Goltz. I will go further. Have your Arizona licensed Structural Engineer generate a structural engineer detail drawings and have him/her look into S.S. Thru-Bolts Snap Toggle or similar. Provide the number of fasteners used for each letter. a. Documents/Drawings submitted to be sealed/signed/dated by the structural engineer 2. Please resubmit. Should you have any questions about these comments, I Justin Eder, R.Arch can be reached at Justin.Eder@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4976 |
||
| 09/17/2025 | Signs Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Sign Review TS-PRM-0825-00331 (455 E. Wetmore Rd.) Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed by Tami Goltz. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. Code reference, Unified Development Code, Article 7A: Sign Standards. Sign Drawings: 1) #8 TEK screws are not an adequate method of attachment for a sign in a block wall. Revise and provide an adequate method of attachment. 2) 1/8" All-thread studs are not an adequate method of attachment for a sign in a block wall. Revise and provide an adequate method of attachment. 3) 1/8" All-thread studs are not an adequate method of attachment for a sign on a plywood on metal stud wall. Revise and provide an adequate method of attachment. |