Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TS-PRM-0723-00407
Parcel: 10408078C

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: PERMANENT SIGN REVIEW v.2

Permit Number - TS-PRM-0723-00407
Review Name: PERMANENT SIGN REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/31/2023 Signs REQUIRES RESUBMIT RE: freestanding sign review (replace existing sign same location)
For: Lincoln
AT: 660 W Auto Mall
Permit: TS-PRM-0723-00407
Date: 7/19/23 (2nd review, 7/31/23)
Reviewer: H. Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov ) & Justin Eder (Justin.Eder@Tucsonaz.gov)

Codes: Unified Development Code (7A) Sign Standards, National Electrical Code (NEC) 600, Tucson-Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), International Building Code (IBC) 2018

1. UDC:
A) I acknowledge the proposed sign is allowed as a monument sign by code, and meets height, setback, sign area. Please provide the following clarifications to the construction, as noted in item 4 below:
2. NEC: all comments addressed, thank you
3. OLC: noted all comments were addressed, thank you

4. IBC:
A) in page 3 of the engineering, in Wind loads, update the typo here to read Category II please.
B) provide section view for the bottom plate / square tube (only top is provided)
C) page 5 of the engineering calcs indicate “check weld of column to base” – infers field welds – check plan and calc to clarify this bottom plate /square tube connection
D) field welds require special inspection
E) clarify anchors for mounting lettering and logo inside to the cabinet face… ? what are TU anchors?
F) Specify how sign cabinetry is mounted to the white structure cabinet – ie. Specifically, the size / type of bolting and typical number used? (add notes to side view / elevation sheet)
G) Specify how the skirt / “base cover” attached? (i.e. epoxy and rivets?) add notes to elevation sheet
F) on sign elevation, footer system shown does not match engineering. Please remove the diagram and add a simple note that says “see engineering for dual caisson and spread footer system”

Depending on revisions resubmitted, further review comments may be forthcoming.
I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov if you have any questions, and you’re also welcome to reach out to my colleague, Justin.Eder@tucsonaz.gov for structural questions. Thank you.
Please email when you’ve resubmitted so we may examine the revised plans faster.