Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: PERMANENT SIGN REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TS-PRM-0723-00407
Review Name: PERMANENT SIGN REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/31/2023 | Signs | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | RE: freestanding sign review (replace existing sign same location) For: Lincoln AT: 660 W Auto Mall Permit: TS-PRM-0723-00407 Date: 7/19/23 (2nd review, 7/31/23) Reviewer: H. Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov ) & Justin Eder (Justin.Eder@Tucsonaz.gov) Codes: Unified Development Code (7A) Sign Standards, National Electrical Code (NEC) 600, Tucson-Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), International Building Code (IBC) 2018 1. UDC: A) I acknowledge the proposed sign is allowed as a monument sign by code, and meets height, setback, sign area. Please provide the following clarifications to the construction, as noted in item 4 below: 2. NEC: all comments addressed, thank you 3. OLC: noted all comments were addressed, thank you 4. IBC: A) in page 3 of the engineering, in Wind loads, update the typo here to read Category II please. B) provide section view for the bottom plate / square tube (only top is provided) C) page 5 of the engineering calcs indicate “check weld of column to base” – infers field welds – check plan and calc to clarify this bottom plate /square tube connection D) field welds require special inspection E) clarify anchors for mounting lettering and logo inside to the cabinet face… ? what are TU anchors? F) Specify how sign cabinetry is mounted to the white structure cabinet – ie. Specifically, the size / type of bolting and typical number used? (add notes to side view / elevation sheet) G) Specify how the skirt / “base cover” attached? (i.e. epoxy and rivets?) add notes to elevation sheet F) on sign elevation, footer system shown does not match engineering. Please remove the diagram and add a simple note that says “see engineering for dual caisson and spread footer system” Depending on revisions resubmitted, further review comments may be forthcoming. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov if you have any questions, and you’re also welcome to reach out to my colleague, Justin.Eder@tucsonaz.gov for structural questions. Thank you. Please email when you’ve resubmitted so we may examine the revised plans faster. |