Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW v.1
Plan Number - TP-PRE-1122-00020
Review Name: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlements | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | Buildings exceeding 30’ shall be provided with aerial access meeting IFC 2018, Appendix D, Section D105. D105.3 Proximity to building. One or more of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15’ and not greater than 30’ from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which aerial apparatus access road positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. If this building is to be a High-Rise we will need to have a lot of discussions. Please contact me. As long as the fire riser has the F.D.C. located on the exterior and is within 100' of the new hydrant you will be compliant. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |
|||
| Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | TP-PRE-1122-00020 (5710 S Nogales HW) 11/22/22 Engineering Comments and Requests 1. Even though the project is within a balanced basin, the stormwater discharges for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year events must be reduced by 15% from pre-development. 2. First flush retention volumes shall be increased by 50 percent over the amount required by the detention/retention manual. (Pima County Regional Flood Control District Stormwater Detention-Retention) 3. Water harvesting must be maximized. Lower impact development guidelines from the retention/detention manual shall be followed to the maximum extent possible. (Tucson Low Impact Development Manual) 4. There is a regulatory wash running through the parcel with Q100 328 CFS. This will have to be addressed in the site design. Faffs Riederer Faffs.riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | PROJECT: NORIEGA MULTI-FAMILY ACTIVITY NO. TP-PRE-1122-00020 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 5710 S NOGALES HY/138-10-0010 CURRENT ZONING: C-2 PROPOSED ZONING: C-3 EXISTING USE: VACANT PARCEL PROPOSED USE: 6 STORY MF HOUSING TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 21, 2022 DUE DATE: November 22, 2022 COMMENTS: 1. There must be a NPPO. An NPPO is required per UDC 7.7.3-B. The NPPO is intended to encourage preservation in place of healthy native plants through sensitive site design that minimizes the disruption of areas within the site containing plants while allowing for salvage and transplantation of plants on the site that are likely to survive. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted or approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the UDC and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval. Maximize the number of preserve in place specimens to the fullest extent possible. 2. Ensure the required number of trees is in all vehicular parking areas (1 tree: 4-5 parking spaces) per UDC 7.6.4.B.1. Placing trees along the edge of a parking area or at the ends of parking row does not meet the intent of the UDC. All spaces within 40’ of a tree is only one of the requirements. The intent is to provide as much shade on the asphalt as possible (TSM 5-01.3.2), and the requirement is 1 tree per 6-8 parking spaces; trees are expected to be placed within the parking area itself to provide shade on asphalt. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a. 3. There needs to be a 10’ street landscape border along S Nogales HWY and E Drexel Rd as well as a 10’ Interior Site border per Table 4.6.4.1 in the UDC. See UDC 7.6.4.C for the landscape border standards. The landscape border should be located entirely on site. 4. There is a regulatory wash on site. 5. There will need to be retention and detention located on site. See Engineering comments for the guidance on this. 6. Maximize rainwater harvesting across the entire site into the landscaped areas, this includes all parking lot trees & landscape borders. 7. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. Using Low Impact Development design and water harvesting provides critical basin detention and first flush retention for all new development and impervious area. The newly adopted Detention/Retention Manual can be found: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-manual.pdf With CoT edits to the manual are found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
|||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | Rezoning Pre-Submittal Transmittal FROM: Nick Martell PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Rezoning Pre-submittal meeting TP-PRE-1122-00020 Address: 5710 s Nogales Hwy Parcel(s): 138-10-0010 Existing Zoning: C-2 Proposed Zoning: C-3 Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Residential-Multifamily TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 23, 2022 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. 2. Proposed use and use-specific standards: none 3. Development standards: 75 ft building height 4. Perimeter yard setbacks: Adjacent to R-Zones-1 ½ H 5. Applicable street setbacks: South Nogales Hwy and Drexel Road are both Major Streets and Routes. The setbacks are 21’ or H from the back of the existing or future curb. 6. Parking requirements: See UDC Article 7.4.4 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-5445 7. Bike parking requirements: See UDC Article 7.4.8 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/tucson_az_udc/0-0-0-5698 8. Landscape requirements can be discussed further with Matt Carlton at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov 9. Additional comments: a. Ensure access standards found in section 7.8 of the UDC and sections 7-01.0.0 and 10-01.0.0 of the Technical Standards Manual are met. 10. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions please contact me at nicholas.martell@tucsonaz.gov. |
|||
| Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |