Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Number: TP-PRE-0723-00264
Parcel: 122180500

Address:
3726 E PIMA ST

Review Status: Approved

Review Details: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW v.1

Plan Number - TP-PRE-0723-00264
Review Name: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Approved
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED TP-PRE-0723-00264 • Pre-Application Conference Review v1 • 3726 E PIMA ST TUCSON, AZ 85716: Based on the information provided, TFD has the following comments:
1. Provide fire sprinkler systems in accordance with 2018 IFC, 903.3.1.2
Additional information would be required to provide a thorough review.
Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov / 520.837.7082
Site Engineering REVIEW COMPLETED 1. Balanced basin detention and first flush retention are required on the site. Please refer to the updated retention/detention manual at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Building-Safety/Building-Engineering-Codes#section-3
2. Maximize water harvesting to all landscaped areas
3. From recent clarification from Environmental Services per TSM section 8, although recycling service isn’t required the site needs to provide at minimum the enclosure space for both solid waste and recycling. A single enclosure won’t be sufficient and a double enclosure or additional single enclosures will be needed to meet this requirement.
4. Sidewalks must have an unobstructed width of at least 4 feet. If there are no wheel stops provided in each parking space, the sidewalk must be an additional 2.5 feet wide to accommodate vehicle encroachment (TSM7-01.4.3 A).
5. Show proposed FLD lot lines. An FLD is a subdivision, and this will require a tentative plat and Final plat for approval.
6. A backup spur is required for the final parking space to the east per UDC 7.4.6 F.


Joshua Garcia
joshua.garcia@tucsonaz.gov
Site Landscape REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PROJECT: FLD MULTI- FAMILY
ACTIVITY NO. TP-PRE-0723-00264
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 3726 E PIMA ST/122-18-0490, 122-18-0500, 122-18-0470, 122-18-046B
ZONING: R-2

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Landscape/NPPO to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards.

COMMENTS:
1. There must be a NPPO or NPPO waiver. An NPPO is required per UDC 7.7.3-B. A Native Plant Preservation Plan, Section 7.7.4, is required to be submitted or approved or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements approved in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the UDC and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 prior to Grading Plan approval.
2. A landscape plan is required per 7.6.2.B.1-b. The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of greater than 25% of existing development to submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4 and Administrative Manual 2-10.
3. Ensure the required number of trees is in all vehicular parking areas (1 tree: 4 parking spaces) per UDC 7.6.4.B.1. Trees are to be distributed evenly throughout the parking area, UDC 7.6.4.1.B.1, UDC Technical Standards Manual 5-01-.3.2 and UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a.
4. There will need to be a street landscape border on E Pima St per UDC 7.6.4.C-2 and Table 7.6.4-1. See UDC 7.6.4.C for landscape border requirements.
5. There will need to be interior landscape borders on the west, east, & south sides of the site per UDC 7.6.4.C-2 and Table 7.6.4-1. See UDC 7.6.4.C for landscape border requirements.
6. See Below for FLD Requirements
a. Per Table 8.7.3-2 FLD Functional Open Space Standards, if the project size is 5 acres or less with less than 13 13/AC, the functional open space requirement is 109 SF/unit. I do not see Functional Open Space (FUOS) on this plan.
b. Per 8.7.3.F-1.d A HOA or management organization shall be established by the developer to be responsible for the ownership, permanent care, and maintenance or functional open space areas.
c. Per 8.7.3.G-1, to the greatest degree practical, detention and retention basins within an FLD shall be designed as Functional Open Space (See UDC 8.7.3-F) by incorporating Multiple Use Concepts and Aesthetic Design Guidelines described in Chapter 4 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, the floodplain ordinance, and in Accordance with UDC Section 7.6.6.C, Stormwater Runoff, FOS amenities within detention and retention basin may count toward meeting Functional Open Space requirements; and developed in accordance with Section 7.11, Detention and Retention Basins.
d. Per 8.7.3.H-1, FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening standards, except as otherwise noted in the FLD section of the UDC.
e. Per Section 8.7.3.H-2, one canopy tree shall be provided every 40 feet of pedestrian circulation systems, if providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot measurement and distribute the trees within the FLD project site along pedestrian circulation systems and within functional open space areas.
f. Any perimeter walls proposed along an existing public ROW, it shall be constructed of, or painted with graffiti-resistant materials. The walls shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials: tile; stone; brick; adobe; a textured material such as stucco or plaster; or metal.
7. See Engineering notes for Retention/Detention.
8. All landscape plans shall incorporate water conserving design as defined in UDC Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual 5.01-5.11.
9. The Landscape Plan should match the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan as well as the Grading Plan. The landscape plan should have spot elevations in the detention/retention areas and in all water harvesting areas in the Landscape Plan.
10. Maximize the rainwater harvesting across the site into the landscape areas, including but not limited to the street landscape borders as well as the tree wells for the required trees for the parking lot.
11. Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required per UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.3.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening. Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. Using Low Impact Development design and water harvesting provides critical basin detention and first flush retention for all new development and impervious area. The newly adopted Detention/Retention Manual can be found: https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-final-201406-manual.pdf

With CoT edits to the manual are found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes/Detention_Retention_Manual_Tech_Standards_Amemdments.pdf
12. The Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan must utilize the Site Water Budget (located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Building-Safety/Water-Energy-Conservation) See TSM 4-01.0.0 Exhibit A. This is how the Water Dept tracks all new development, not through First Flush Retention Charts.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988
Site Zoning REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal
PDSD Zoning Review
FROM: Paul Camarena, Planner
PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting –
Address: 3726 E. Pima St
Parcel(s): 122-18-0490, 122-18-0500, 122-18-0470
Zoning: R-2
Existing Use: Vacant
Proposed Use: Multifamily FLD

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 8/2/2023

COMMENTS:
1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06.5.0- FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD)
2. The FLD may be developed in the R-2 zone. Will this project be using the standard FLD Development alternative A.
3.The Dimensional standard for Alternative A are 62% site coverage max, building height 25ft. There is no minimum lot size within an FLD.
Site Coverage = The total area of improvement divided ( individual residential lots, functional open space , vehicle use areas) by the total land area of the site
4. Open space requirement calculation (Less than 13 DU/AC* = 109 SF**/unit) = 654 square ft

5. Interior lot setbacks “The perimeter yard requirements of Section 6.3.4, Dimensional Standards and Exceptions Tables, may be reduced for setbacks along interior lot lines to the extent permitted by the City’s adopted Building Codes”
6. Perimeter yard along FLD project site boundaries. The perimeter yard requirements of Section 6.3.4, Dimensional Standards and Exceptions Tables, may be reduced for setbacks along interior lot lines to the extent permitted by the City’s adopted Building Codes. The setback along Pima ST would be 20ft measured from the future property line.

8. Privacy Mitigation is required when multistory residences are proposed adjacent to existing single story residences and the existing residences are zoned R-2 or more restrictive.
9. A neighborhood meeting will occur not more than 60 days prior to the date of the submittal of the application.
10. Ensure access standards found in section 7.8 of the UDC and sections 7-01.0.0 and 10-01.0.0 of the Technical Standards Manual are met. Pedestrian access along the street is required. Show complete pedestrian circulation for the site.

11.Where a single-family attached or multi-family FLD project is adjacent to existing single-family residential development , the FLD shall provide buffering in order to preserve the privacy of the existing residential development . Examples of buffering include, but are not limited to, landscaping , a fence, or a wall. The proposed buffering shall be included as conditions on the approved subdivision plat or site plan .
12. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards.
If you have any questions, please contact me at Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov
Traffic Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Based on estimated trip generation, no negative impacts to roadway network are anticipated. No objection from DTM Traffic Engineering division.
TW New Area Development REVIEW COMPLETED TP-PRE-0723-00264 - Pre-Application Conference Review v1 – 3726 E PIMA ST

1. Based on the information provided, Tucson Water has no objections to, or comments on, the proposed development.

2. The above comments are based on the limited preliminary information provided by the applicant and should not be construed as a complete review of the proposal. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to:

Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer
Tucson Water, New Development Section
201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, AZ 85726-7210
(520) 837-2106
tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov