Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: MODIFICATIONS REVIEW v.1

Plan Number - TP-MOD-0924-000009
Review Name: MODIFICATIONS REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
Entitlements REQUIRES RESUBMIT Page 10- May need to highlight the previous pad and the distinct amendments to that pad including a rewrite of many of the pad elements.

Page 12-Due to the high number of plan policy items, it may be useful to group into governance, recreation, sustainability, economics etc.

Page 14- Due to the high number of plan policy items, it may be useful to group into governance, recreation, sustainability, economics etc.

Page 20- May add year of subdivision was built.

Page 24 - Any Sonoran Corridor impact of alignment?

Page 47 - this is a good terminology to group relevant the previous PT policies .

Page 56 - Provide a narrative explaining the previous R-1, SH and I-2 designation and how I-2 and C-3 may be the most useful zone due to new priorities of LRSC.

Page 57- Highlight the previous PAD included I-2, SH and R-1 and only I-2 seems to be carried over to the amendment.
Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Please supply a summary of the changes made for this major amendment with the next submittal.

Stephen Blood
(520) 837-4958
Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov
Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. On Page 50 of the PAD document, consider consolidating the uses in 4.8.6 and 4.8.7. There are some redundancies that can be addressed. Please see note on the PAD document.
2. On Page 54 of the PAD document, please add a reference to the Bike Parking section UDC 7.4.8. The article only indicates 7.4.4 - Vehicle Parking. Please see note on the PAD document.

For any questions, please contact me at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov