Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: MODIFICATIONS REVIEW v.1
Plan Number - TP-MOD-0623-000018
Review Name: MODIFICATIONS REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real Estate | NOT REQUIRED | ||||
| Entitlements | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - PLN | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Historic | REVIEW COMPLETED | Historic and archaeological resources addressed in the PAD document. | |||
| ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | RE: sign district review For: H2K PAD / Revision At: Houghton to Colossal Cave Roads, north side of freeway Proposed PAD zoning (annexation pending 302 acres, thus revised PAD) Case: TP-MOD-0623-000018 Date: 07/07/23 Reviewer: H. Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov) Codes: Unified Development Code, Section 7A, Sign Standards 1. UDC: a) Please be reminded that the Sign Standards shall be applied to this development for both allowed sign area and sign types permitted. b) If you have an Architectural Review Board that would include sign review, (i.e. use of freestanding or freeway signs, for example) a letter from them will be required with submittal of the sign package to confirm allowance. c) Houghton Road is a scenic route. As staff discussed prior with WLB staff, all land within 400’ of the future right of way of Houghton Road is within the Scenic Corridor Zone Sign District, UDC 7A.11.3, including the entirety of any parcel that is within that 400’ foot vicinity. d) Plan accordingly to clearly separate the properties in this overall PAD development into two different sign districts with use of property line boundaries and right of way boundaries. e) To clarify, this PAD development is adjacent to the freeway. While the PAD District and underlying Industrial zoning the PAD is to be written off of allows freeway signs and freestanding pole signs for a premise, the Scenic District does not. f) Know that the Scenic Corridor Zone Sign District provides for a building signage ratio at only 1.25 square feet of sign area per tenant elevation, with a secondary cap of 250 square feet of attached building sign area per tenant. g) The underlying Industrial Zoning of the PAD permits a ratio of 4 square feet of sign area per each linear foot of development frontage for a premise. h) To reiterate, Freeway signs must be outside the Scenic Corridor Sign District, can be only within the Industrial Zoned PAD area, and located within 250’ of the freeway right of way line. If you have any questions or concepts you wish to share in advance, I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | Site Engineering has no objections to the proposed PAD amendment. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | LANDSCAPE/NPPO has no concerns or objections to the revised PAD document. Matthew Carlton matthew.carlton@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Sun Tran Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments David Stiffey David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Transportation Landscape Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Water Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED |