Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Plan Number: TP-ENT-1122-00003
Parcel: 124031900
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: ENTITLEMENT REVIEW v.1
Plan Number - TP-ENT-1122-00003
Review Name: ENTITLEMENT REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlements | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TP-ENT-1122-00003 Sixth at Campbell PAD Entitlements Section Comments Pre-PAD Review – 1st Review Due January 3, 2023 1. It would be helpful to include in the Introduction a reference to how this is a re-submittal of the PAD document and proposed project and how this iteration includes incorporating revisions that address community commitments from the previous public process, i.e. see Zoning Examiner’s Final Report that noted these revisions. It might be helpful to outline these changes like the revision letter in a document in the Appendix so the public and neighbors can easily be apprised of the changes / additions form the last go around. 2. See Comments from DTM – Provide updated TIA as it was not provided in the Appendix 3. Revise and correct references in PAD document, Introduction, Appendix Exhibit 7, etc. to reflect the revised building height for Section A as 80-feet as outlined in the change letter 4. On page I-10 the parking garage height calls out 25-feet while the change letter notes 28-feet, please reconcile this height discrepancy 5. Call out the potential Pocket Park on Martin in a separate Exhibit or on Exhibit 7 it will help identify where this could potentially be located. Also show pedestrian circulation through potential Pocket Park or if no park is built then enhanced pedestrian access from the south along the Martin route 6. Put TAA review comments back in the PAD document 7. Under Permitted Land Uses please clarify the notation P (13), P (1,2), what is this referencing and where are these use standards found? UDC, PAD? 8. Explain accessible spaces may be provided off-site or ¼ mile away [III-9] vs where referenced on [III-10] where it states parking for PAD district may only be provided onsite 9. On page III-27, minor amendments clarify or make more clear as to what criteria is used to determine a minor amendment for parking reductions 10. Revise note on page III-10, Table 2, to reflect more accurately the minor/major amendment review process as any change in access or circulation is reviewed per the UDC criteria to see if it is a minor or major change 11. Provide more information as to what types of rooftop amenities that can or cannot be allowed 12. PAD document, design materials, should address using materials that can help mitigate heat island affect; provide more discussion on climate sustainability measures |
|||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Wastewater (RWRD) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | December 23, 2022 TO: John Beall Entitlements Section City of Tucson Planning and Development Services FROM: Mirela Hromatka, Planner Sr. Planning Unit Technical Services and Engineering Division SUBJECT: TP-ENT-1122-00003 – Sixth at Campbell PAD From C-1 to PAD PAD Document, November 2022 Tax Parcels #124-03-171B, -1700, -169A, -1680, -1670, -1660, -1900, -1890, -1880, -1860, -175A, -174A, -1870, -173B ; 2.36 acre The Planning Unit of the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the request and offers the following comments for your use. The request is to rezone a 2.4-acre property comprised of 14 parcels located at the southwest corner of N Campbell Ave and E Sixth St to allow for the construction of a mixed-use development. The development proposes high-rise multi-family residential buildings, in addition to commercial, retail, and other uses compatible with the adjacent UA campus. The property fronts an 8-inch public sewer in 6th Street. Capacity is currently available in limited quantities in this sewer line. Another 8-inch line in Martin Ave ties to the system that has more capacity, however, depending on capacity demand for the entire development, augmentation might be required in a section of the downstream system to provide additional capacity for this development. The applicant and/or their consultant will work with PCRWRD to analyze and evaluate the impact on the system capacity and to determine if augmentation will be required. For investigative approval regarding sewer service availability in the existing sewer system, please submit a Type I capacity request to sewer@pima.gov. The required form to request a Type I capacity investigation letter may be found at: Capacity-Type1-Investigation.pdf (pima.gov). Allocation of capacity will be made by the Type III Capacity Response. PCRWRD has no objections to the proposed rezoning but adds the following wastewater conditions: Sixth at Campbell PAD December 23, 2022 TP-ENT-1122-00003 Page 2of 2 REZONING CONDITIONS Should the City of Tucson Mayor and Council be inclined to approve this rezoning, the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) recommends the following rezoning conditions: 1. The owner(s) shall not construe any action by Pima County as a commitment to provide sewer service to any new development within the rezoning area until Pima County executes an agreement with the owner(s) to that effect. 2. The owner(s) shall obtain written documentation from the PCRWRD stating that treatment and conveyance capacity is available for any new development within the rezoning area, no more than 90 days before submitting any rezoning, tentative plat, development plan, preliminary sewer layout, sewer improvement plan, or request for building permit for review. Should treatment and / or conveyance capacity not be available at that time, the owner(s) shall enter into a written agreement addressing the option of funding, designing and constructing the necessary improvements to Pima County’s public sewerage system at his or her sole expense or cooperatively with other affected parties. All such improvements shall be designed and constructed as directed by the PCRWRD. 3. The owner(s) shall time all new development within the rezoning area to coincide with the availability of treatment and conveyance capacity in the downstream public sewerage system. 4. The owner(s) shall connect all development within the rezoning area to Pima County’s public sewer system at the location and in the manner specified by the PCRWRD in its capacity response letter and as specified by PCRWRD at the time of review of the tentative plat, development plan, preliminary sewer layout, sewer construction plan, or request for building permit. 5. The owner(s) shall fund, design and construct all off-site and on-site sewers necessary to serve the rezoning area, in the manner specified at the time of review of the tentative plat, development plan, preliminary sewer layout, sewer construction plan or request for a building permit. 6. The owner(s) shall complete the construction of all necessary public and/or private sewerage facilities as required by all applicable agreements with Pima County, and all applicable regulations, including the Clean Water Act and those promulgated by ADEQ, before treatment and conveyance capacity in the downstream public sewerage system is permanently committed for any new development within the rezoning area. If you wish to discuss the above conditions, please contact me at 724-6488. Copy: Project |
|||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Conditions of approval: 1. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, the "proposed structure is in proximity to a navigation facility and may impact the assurance of navigation signal reception. The FAA [requests] that you file." a. As the project site develops, each project applicant must file FAA Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for each proposed project unless the FAA staff, with the Obstruction Evaluation/Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA), provides the project applicant with written communication that filing FAA Form 74460 is not required. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns identified by the FAA. Note that cranes proposed to be used on site must also be identified on Form 7460. File FAA Form 7460 here: https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp and select the option 'if construction or alternation IS NOT LOCATED on an airport'. Scott Robidoux Manager of Planning, C.M. 520-573-4811 srobidoux@flytucson.com |
|||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | December 6, 2022 City of Tucson John Beall Entitlements Section RE: TP-ENT-1122-00003 Sixth on Campbell Dear Mr. Beall; On behalf of Tucson Electric Power (TEP), thank you for the opportunity to comment on this rezoning memo. TEP’s existing infrastructure is at its limit in the area. Official load plans will need to be submitted by the owner/developer in order for TEP to fully assess the future needs and requirements. Please have the owner/developer submit a new service application and any other pertinent information well in advance to ensure that TEP can build and/or extend the appropriate facilities to this development. Please email me with any questions or concerns. I can be reached at Keri.Tallorin@tep.com, or by phone at (425) 633-7431. Respectfully, Keri Tallorin Environmental & Land Use Planner Tucson Electric Power Company a UNS Energy Corporation |
|||
| Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PAD document should note that the historic assessment for eligibility/relocation will be completed by someone who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Qualifications. | |||
| Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TIA was not included in Appendix of Design Compatibility Report | |||
| External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | From: Doug Moseke <dmoseke@azdot.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 12:34 PM To: Susan Montes <Susan.Montes@tucsonaz.gov>; James Gomes <jgomes@azdot.gov>; Jeremy D. Moore <jmoore3@azdot.gov>; Richard Freije <rfreije@azdot.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TP-ENT-1122-00003 Sixth at Campbell PAD Good Afternoon Susan. ADOT has no comments. Regards, Doug Moseke, PE Assistant District Engineer 1221 S. 2nd Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85713 O: 520.388.4219 C: 520.354.0786 |
|||
| External Reviewers - AZ State Land | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | To: TucsonRezoning <TucsonRezoning@tucsonaz.gov> PDSD team, On behalf of the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, I am submitting the following response to Case: TP-ENT-1122-00003 Sixth at Campbell PAD. No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this (development/subdivision plat/Planned Area Development/etc.). Please let me know if you need anything else. Tom Fisher Project Manager City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department |
|||
| External Reviewers - Davis Monthan AFB | REVIEW COMPLETED | To: TucsonRezoning <TucsonRezoning@tucsonaz.gov> Sir/Ma'am DMAFB planning staff have reviewed the PAD plan and changes to PAD letter and find this proposed PAD should not impact the mission of DMAFB. Thank you Kacey V/r B. Kacey Carter, Civ USAF ≡✪≡ Base Community Planner 355th Civil Engineer Squadron/CENPL Davis-Monthan AFB AZ 520-228-3291 bonnie.carter@us.af.mil |
|||
| External Reviewers - PC RFCD | REVIEW COMPLETED | To: TucsonRezoning <TucsonRezoning@tucsonaz.gov> The Pima County Regional Flood Control District has no objection to this project. Patricia Gilbert, CFM Principal Hydrologist Floodplain Management Division 201 North Stone 9 th Floor Tucson, Arizona, 85701 Phone: 520.724.4606. Patricia.gilbert@pima.gov |
|||
| External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REVIEW COMPLETED | Mon 11/28/2022 12:00 PM To: TucsonRezoning <TucsonRezoning@tucsonaz.gov> Good aft ernoon, Pima County Addressing does not have comments on TP-ENT-1122-00003 Sixth at Campbell PAD. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Offi cial Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1 st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
|||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Assessor | REVIEW COMPLETED | Thank you for the information. I receive these notices for informational purposes only. I have no comments. Thank you, Linda Chabot Senior Property Appraiser Commercial/Industrial Land Pima County Assessor’s Office |
|||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Development Services | REVIEW COMPLETED | November 30, 2022 SENT VIA EMAIL John Beall Entitlements Section, Planning and Development Services Department City of Tucson Tucson, AZ 85701 Subject: TP-ENT-1122-00003 (RZ19-005) Sixth at Campbell Pre-PAD Review Dear John: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on City of Tucson TR-ENT-1122-00003, for approx. 2.36 acres located at the southwest corner of the intersection of E. Sixth Street and N. Campbell Avenue, for a proposed a mixed-use development regional activity center. The Planned Area Development (PAD) site consists of fourteen parcels located along E. Sixth Street and N. Campbell Avenue – the parcels are a mix of residential, office and commercial uses and parking, zoned C-1, R-2 and P. The site has residential use and UA parking garage to the south, mixed commercial / residential use to the east (Sam Hughes Place), commercial use to the west. Sixth Street has an existing mix of residential, commercial and academic uses, and the proposed PAD development would make more efficient use of the properties and frontage along the street. The site takes advantage of its proximity to the University of Arizona campus to the north, with the football stadium and basketball arena both less than 1000 feet away. County planning staff previously reviewed this PAD under case RZ19-005 in December 2019, with no objection to the proposed PAD. The applicant requests minor text edits, and updated development standards, and permitted and prohibited uses. The changes appear to be mostly superficial in nature to the PAD. Pima County Development Services Department, Planning Division, has no objection to the proposed PAD. In particular, the division supports efforts to increase density, mixed use and transit oriented development, especially in the urban core, along major streets, and in areas supported by existing infrastructure and services, to help ameliorate housing supply in general in the region, which has had the greatest impact on the availability of affordable housing. Sincerely, Mark Holden, AICP Principal Planner Pima County Development Services Department, Planning Division |
|||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Natural Resources | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Transportation | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Unified School District (TUSD) | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | Please contact me so that we may discuss Fire items that may be a concern and or issue for the build. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |
|||
| Real Estate | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | The Signs Division has no additional review comments than were first provided in this rezoning case. Thank you. | |||
| Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | PROJECT: SIXTH AT CAMPBELL PAD ACTIVITY NO: TP-ENT-1122-00003 ADDRESS/PARCEL NO:1838 E 6TH STREET/MULTIPLE CURRENT ZONING: C-1, R-2, P PROPOSED USE: PAD AT 6TH Pre-submittal for preliminary review COMMENTS: 1. Part III Section B Subsection 13 should read “Refer to Part III Section F (Post-Development Hydrology) for City of Tucson Engineering Department …” 2. Part III Section F Post-Development Hydrology refers to the “five-year threshold retention based on undeveloped conditions.” The five-year threshold is an old standard. Please update this section to refer to the current first flush retention standard. Faffs Riederer faffs.riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | PROJECT: SIXTH AT CAMPBELL PAD ACTIVITY NO: TP-ENT-1122-00003 ADDRESS/PARCEL NO:1838 E 6TH STREET/MULTIPLE CURRENT ZONING: C-1, R-2, P PROPOSED USE: PAD AT 6TH TRANSMITTAL DATE: DECEMBER 20, 2022 DUE DATE: DECEMBER 26, 2022 The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Landscape/NPPO to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. COMMENTS: 1. Under Chapter J Design Standards, Sections 4 & 5 seem to be in direct conflict with one another in terms of what they outline. Section 4 “Pedestrian-Oriented Streetscape Design Standards” bullet point 5.3 states that “Streetscapes shall be designed to create shaded a shaded microclimate in order to promote high levels of pedestrian activity and seating to encourage physical activity and social opportunities.” while Section 5 states that “...shade shall be provided for at least 50% of all sidewalks and pedestrian access paths...The shade provided by the building may serve to meet this standard; shade may also be provided by trees, arcades, canopies, or shade structures.” Allowing the building to serve as part of the 50% shade requirement negates the idea that “Streetscapes shall be designed to create shaded a shaded microclimate in order to promote high levels of pedestrian activity and seating to encourage physical activity and social opportunities.” It seems hard to have a microclimate without some sort of planting. Landscape/NPPO would like to see it noted that a percentage of the shade requirement in the streetscape design be provided by trees as outlined in UDC Section 7.6.4.C Street Landscape Borders with one appropriate canopy tree every 33’ in the streetscape areas. 2. The Exception in Section 5 allows for the importance of shade compliance to be removed through an exception or waiver. This exception should be removed from the document. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov or 520-837-4988 |
|||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Transportation - Bike/Ped | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Transportation Landscape Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Tucson Water New Area Development | REVIEW COMPLETED | Tucson Water has no objections to the proposed planned area development, but requests the following conditions be added to the planned area development rezoning document: 1. The owner / developer shall construct all necessary on-site and off-site public water mains necessary to serve the rezoned area at his or her own expense. 2. The owner / developer shall submit a Feasibility Study Water Master Plan to Tucson Water for review approximately 12 months before construction is desired to start for the purpose of verifying Tucson Water’s existing distribution can supply the proposed development with the desired quantity of water. 3. The Feasibility Study Water Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items: a. The footprints of the proposed buildings b. The desired points of connection to Tucson Water’s existing water distribution system. c. The proposed layout (and size) of any proposed public water mains. d. The Tucson Fire Department’s fire flow requirements based on the buildings size and construction type. e. Any automatic sprinkler system demand, including the hose stream allowance. f. A potable water fixture unit count conducted for the project using the 2018 International Plumbing Code. g. The number and size of any proposed irrigation water service lines and water meters. 4. If the City of Tucson’s existing water distribution system is not capable of supplying the total water demand of the proposed development, the owner / developer shall be financially responsible for modifying and/or enhancing the existing water distribution system to meet those needs. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to: Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Section 201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220 P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov |