Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Approved
Review Details: ENTITLEMENT REVIEW v.2
Plan Number - TP-ENT-0923-00036
Review Name: ENTITLEMENT REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Approved
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlement Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Entitlements | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | Thank you for the opportunity to review this New Special Exception, ADOT has no comments. | |||
| External Reviewers - AZ State Land | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Davis Monthan AFB | REVIEW COMPLETED | DMAFB Planning staff has reviewed the proposed rezoning and find this action should not negatively impact our mission. B. Kasey Carter | |||
| External Reviewers - PC RFCD | REVIEW COMPLETED | The Regional Flood Control District has no objection. Patricia Gilbert , CFM | |||
| External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REVIEW COMPLETED | Pima County Addressing does not have comments on TP-ENT-0923-00036 _3237 Fort Lowell , O-3 | |||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Assessor | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Development Services | REVIEW COMPLETED | The site is located on the north side of Fort Lowell Road, at the corner of Edith Bl. The site is occupied by an industrial use. Pima County Development Services Department, Planning Division, has no objection to the proposed rezoning.Spencer Hickman Senior Planner |
|||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Natural Resources | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Transportation | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Wastewater (RWRD) | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tohono Oodham | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | REVIEW COMPLETED | According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notice Criteria Tool, no Notice Criteria are exceeded at the project site. The Tucson Airport Authority approves the zoning examiner special exception request, has no additional comments to provide, and is not requesting a resubmittal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I may be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, C.M. Manager of Planning |
|||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | On behalf of Tucson Electric Power (TEP), thank you for the opportunity to comment on this special exception memorandum. TEP has no objections to this memo. This property is located within TEP’s service territory and will require a new service application from the owner/developer to extend service to the new location. Please email me with any questions or concerns. I can be reached at Keri.Tallorin@tep.com, or by phone at (425) 633-7431. |
|||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Unified School District (TUSD) | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Historic | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| IPC - Entitlements | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| IPC - Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| IPC - Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| IPC - Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| IPC - Traffic Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | No comments from DTM Traffic Engineering Division. | |||
| Real Estate | REVIEW COMPLETED | The Real Estate Division has no objections or comment for the above referenced request.- Bob Beecher- Supervisor- Real Estate Division | |||
| ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | TP-ENT-0923-00036 (3237 E FORT LOWELL RD TUCSON, AZ 85716) Comments: 1. TSM 7-01.2.0, TSM 7-01.3.1 All new uses of land or structures require sidewalks (regulated by TSM 10-01.0.0). 2. TSM 10-01.4.1.A.1.a - A 5’ sidewalk is required along the frontage of Edith Blvd. A Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) may be required if there are less than 7 ft between the back of curb and the existing wall as TSM 10-01.3.3.D.1 requires a 2’ minimum buffer between back of wedge curb and adjacent sidewalk. 3. TSM 10-01.4.1 - Sidewalk along Ft. Lowell Rd must be shown to have a cross slope of 2% or less where it is crossed by driveways or be reconstructed. 4. TSM 10-01.4.1.A.1.a - If the sidewalk along Ft. Lowell Rd is being reconstructed, it should built to 6’ wide. 5. SDG 3-14 Where sidewalks cross driveways, the sidewalk should be dominant, maintaining the level, slope, and material of the sidewalk. Email me for examples. 6. TSM 10-01.3.3.A, 10-01.3.3.C.9 - A pedestrian easement will be required if the sidewalk crosses onto private property. At time of development, contact Bob Beecher with Department of Transportation and Mobility Real Estate at bob.beecher@tucsonaz.gov for an easement template and instructions. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov Abbreviations: City of Tucson Code (COTC), Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM), Technical Standards Manual (TSM), Street Design Guide (SDG), Pima Association of Governments Standard Details (P. A. G. SD), Access Management Guidelines (AMG), Major Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R). |
|||
| Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | RE: signage aspects For: Substitution of Nonconforming Use (SNU) - retail / wholesale Plumber in O-3 Case: TP-ENT-0923-00036 AT: 3237 E Fort Lowell Road Reviewer: H. Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov) Date: 12/8/23 Codes: Unified Development Code 7A, Sign Standards (7A), National Electrical Code (NEC) 600, Tucson-Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), International Building Code (IBC) 2018 Status: PDSD staff have no specific signage recommendations for this location for the SNU request. The following comments are to provide code information only. 1. No billboards are present at this location. 2. No nonconforming signs are present at this location. 3. Sign area allowances and sign types are the same within the O-2, O-3 office zones and also within the C-1, C-2 and C-3 commercial zones. The applicable Sign District is the General Business District for this location. 4. The sign area allowance calculation for attached signs is 3 square feet of sign area for each linear foot of street development frontage, providing that signage does not cover more than 30% of any building elevation. Sign types may range from wall signs, awning or canopy signs and require a licensed sign contractor for submittal. 5. Signage shall shut off at midnight via a timing device, and shall not exceed 4400k light brightness (or the applicable Outdoor Lighting Code color temperature in place at time of permitting). 6. Detached signs of any type (pole, monument or low-profile) are permitted at this location on the Fort Lowell frontage, providing they do not interfere with access nor parking in the manner presented at the site. Please reference UDC 7A.10.2.C. for sign criteria for freestanding signs. A licensed sign contractor is required for permitting process for a freestanding sign. Please feel free to contact me should you wish to discuss any signage aspects. |
|||
| Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | Site engineering has no comments or concerns about the proposed substitution of use. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Streetcar Track Access Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Sun Tran Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Transportation - Bike/Ped | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Transportation Landscape Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | no comments | |||
| Tucson Water New Area Development | REVIEW COMPLETED | TP-ENT-0923-00036 - Entitlement Review v1 – 3237 E FORT LOWELL RD The City of Tucson’s Water Department (Tucson Water) has no objections to the requested Substitution with a Use From a Different Land Use. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to: Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Section 201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220 P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov |