Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: ENTITLEMENT REVIEW v.1
Plan Number - TP-ENT-0625-00011
Review Name: ENTITLEMENT REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlement Review Coordinator Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Entitlements | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - AZ State Land | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Davis Monthan AFB | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - PC RFCD | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Assessor | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Development Services | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Natural Resources | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Transportation | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Wastewater (RWRD) | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tohono Oodham | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Tucson Unified School District (TUSD) | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Fire New Construction | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Historic | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Real Estate | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| ROW Engineering Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Signs | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Site Engineering | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Site Landscape | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Site Zoning | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Streetcar Track Access Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Sun Tran Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Transportation - Bike/Ped | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Transportation Landscape Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Tucson Water New Area Development | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| IPC - Entitlements | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Resubmit required for neighborhood meeting materials/full submittal. | |||
| IPC - Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| IPC - Site Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| IPC - Site Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | PDSD TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning & Development Services Department FROM: Fernando Garcia PDSD Site Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Translation Zoning Parcel(s): 305-01-009B Zoning: Pima County (RH) TP-ENT-0625-00011 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 16, 2025 1. This parcel is included within Davis-Monthan AFB Airport Departure Corridor 3 (ADC-3), which under the City of Tucson Unified Development Code, be subject to Article 5.6 (Airport Environs Zone), and specifically, 5.6.8.C. Among the standards of ADC-3 are the following: • 5.6.8.C.1.a. For uses in the Industrial, Wholesaling and Storage land use groups, the maximum FAR is .40 of the project site area; • 5.6.8.C.1.b. For all other non-residential land use groups, the maximum FAR is .20 of the project site area; • 5.6.8.C.1.c. The minimum project site area is five acres; • 5.6.8.C.1.d. The maximum permitted building height is 62 feet from design grade elevation or the height limit of underlying zone, whichever is more restrictive; and, • 5.6.8.C.1.e. Any meeting space and function areas where people gather in excess of 5,000 square feet in area shall be located underground. Uses within the Retail Trade Use Group, Utilities Use Group, and Commercial Services Use Group – for example, Administrative and Professional Office; Food Service; Medical Service; Technical Service; Transportation Service, Air Carrier; and Transportation Service, Land Carrier; Traveler’s Accommodation – would be required to utilize a .20 floor area ratio (FAR). Per 5.6.10, exemptions to the standards of 5.6.8.C would require a Zoning Examiner Special Exception Procedure, as well as notification of the DMAFB Installation Command. 2. Within the City of Tucson jurisdiction, S Houghton Rd, S Harrison Rd, and E Brekke Rd are designated as arterial roads. As such, this parcel would be covered by the Major Streets & Roads Overlay, subject to UDC Article 5.4. 3. S Houghton Rd in this area is designated an “arterial scenic” road with a future right-of-way width of 130’. As such, this parcel would be covered by the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ), subject to UDC Article 5.3. 4. Contiguous parcels already within the City of Tucson jurisdiction are also designated as Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ), subject to UDC Article 5.7. Per 5.7.2.F, “As annexation occurs, additional resource corridors or extensions of resource corridors may be added to the ERZ Maps.” An Environmental Resource Report (ERR) may be required for development in ERZ. In ERZ, when critical riparian habitat areas are disturbed, a mitigation plan that addresses encroachment and restoration is required. ERZ also limits encroachment into the 100-year floodplain. 5. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During future review processes, the Site Zoning Review Section will conduct a full review to assure compliance with applicable UDC development criteria and technical standards. If you have any questions, please contact me at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov. |
|||
| IPC - Traffic Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | No substantial comments at this time. Any future roadway connections to City streets/public ROW would need to meet City standards. |