Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: FIRE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW v.1

Permit Number - TF-FCP-0726-00453
Review Name: FIRE CONSTRUCTION REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/28/2026 Fire New Construction - Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Ron,
This seems to have the same problems as the bottom floor system we discussed yesterday. I just went ahead an copied those notes for your review on this project and they are below:
I'm looking at the battery calc's and see that the annunciator isn't there. The spec sheets submitted show the communicator as an SLE- Max2 series while the plans show the SLE-LTEV-CFB-PS communicator. I'm also seeing that the communicator is in both the FACP battery calc and the RPS 1 battery calc, but both also show it isn't using ANY power at all in either standby or alarm status. ??? I'm a little confused with all this. Feel free to reach out to me with any questions or explanations if these are in fact correct.
Ryan Johnson
ryan.johnson@tucsonaz.gov
07/16/2026 TFD Application Completeness Check Express REVIEW COMPLETED