Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Plan Number: TD-DIV-0923-00105
Parcel: 116162450
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: LAND DIVISION/SUBDIVISION v.2
Plan Number - TD-DIV-0923-00105
Review Name: LAND DIVISION/SUBDIVISION v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| External Reviewers - Pima County Wastewater (RWRD) | APPROVED | Record P23WS00034: Sewer Layout Approval Record Status: Issued | |||
| CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. See previous comment 2 – Show detention/retention basins in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner. This requirement is straight out of the Admin Manual 2-07.5.4.I and has no interpretation or detailed explanation to accompany it. It also doesn’t distinguish anywhere between large/small residential subdivisions or large/small commercial subdivisions. It applies to all final plats, block plats, minor subdivisions, and condominium plats as outlined in 2-07.1.0 Applicability. Please show the basins on the plat. Please note that a metes and bounds description is not necessary and an outline within a common area or as the common area will be acceptable. Also as the result of an increasing number of issues with previously developed projects of the proposed type, we are no longer approving sites functioning outside the requirements of our code. 2. See previous comment 3 omitting the word delineated as I am not sure why I added that word – UDC 7.11.1 A&B – Detention and retention basins shall be: A. Located in a common area, outside the boundaries of a residential lot; and B. Owned and maintained by the homeowners organization or management organization established by the developer. Please show the detention and retention basins in common area owned and maintained by a management organization. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Speedway at Main – Lots 1-4 FINAL PLAT (2nd Review) TD-DIV-0923-00105 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 7, 2023 DUE DATE: December 31, 2023 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 2-07.1.0 APPLICABILITY Final plats, block plats, minor subdivisions, and condominium plats shall be prepared according to the requirements provided below. Hereafter referred to as “plat” or “plats.” A final plat serves as a survey document suitable for recordation of all or part of an approved tentative plat, if applicable. The final plat must conform to the approved tentative plat or site plan in lot configuration, design, and required conditions of development. The final plat, once approved, is recorded in the Pima County Recorder’s Office. The final plat is kept on file and becomes part of the permanent record for the subject site. 2-07.5.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-07.5.1 General 1. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-07.5.1.A.3 – Label all subdivisions within the 1 square mile on the location map. Additional Comments: 2. This comment was not addressed. 2-07.5.2.A – General Note 7 will need to be completed prior to recordation of this plat. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat & detailed response letter. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nocholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. |
|||
| CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Commercial Building | REVIEW COMPLETED | See Residential Building approval. | |||
| New Services/JOC | REVIEW COMPLETED | TD-DIV-0923-00105 - Land Division_Subdivison v2 – 405 W SPEEDWAY BL 1. Both Tucson Water and PDSD staff do not believe my previous comment regarding the need to show the stormwater drainage detention and retention basins in a Common Area as required by Section 7.11.1.A of the UDC Administrative Manual has been adequately addressed. Tucson Water staff will not pursue this issue further, however. This issue has been transferred to the PDSD Engineering Reviewer, Mr. Stephen Blood, to address, as it falls more within PDSD’s purview than Tucson Water’s. No response to Tucson Water is required. 2. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to: Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Section 201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220 P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov |