Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: LAND DIVISION/SUBDIVISION v.1
Plan Number - TD-DIV-0626-00035
Review Name: LAND DIVISION/SUBDIVISION v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | ||||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Report Date: 06/10/2026 Description : Address Review of TD-DIV-0626-00035 - Address Review of TD-DIV-0626-00035 Address : , , , Record Type : Addressing Document Filename : Plan Set Reviewer Contact Information: Corrections in the following table need to be applied before a plan is approved Review Report - Resubmittal Requested Application Number: P26AD00465 Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments DSD Addressing 1 06/10/262026 Yes 01 COVER SHEET David Wilging : DSD Addressing Please create a unique name for this plat so it can be differentiated from the original plat..e.g. Phase II 4 06/10/262026 Yes 01 COVER SHEET David Wilging : DSD Addressing S 5 06/10/262026 Yes 01 COVER SHEET David Wilging : DSD Addressing Court Or Place 2 06/10/262026 Yes 02 PLAT SHEET David Wilging : DSD Addressing Court or Place General Comments Pima County Public Works 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 If you have any questions please call 520- 724-6490 for an appointment to discuss this notice. If following discussions with staff you still disagree with the below listed deficiencies, you may appeal to the Building Official in accordance with Pima County Code 15.04.060 by submitting the form posted on our web site with payment of appeal fee prior to permit application expiration. Disputes about the interpretation of the Zoning Code may be appealed to a Pima County Board of Adjustment under A.R.S. § 11 -816 and P.C.C. § 18.93.060. Please submit all plans, calculations and specifications to us electronically via the Digital Projects page in the online portal. Comment ID Comment Date Corrections Needed Page Ref Reviewer : Department Review Comments 3 06/10/262026 Yes 02 PLAT SHEET David Wilging : DSD Addressing S. Re-Submittal Procedures Please submit all documents using Citizen Access at permits.pima.gov (i.e. plans, drawings, calculations, quantities, exhibits, photographs, letters, etc.). 1. Please go to permits.pima.gov and login to your account to access review comments and resubmit. 2. If you have questions or need clarification regarding comments, please contact the reviewer. 3. Provide a response to each correction comment. 4. To resubmit, upload revised full plan set. Should the resubmittal not completely address this request for corrections, the application maybe denied requiring a new application and payment all applicable review fees in accordance with A.R.S. § 11-1605 |
|||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Assessor Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N STONE AVENUE Tucson, Arizona 85701 SUZANNE DROUBIE ASSESSOR TO: City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Department FROM: Jayden Fenske GIS Analyst I Pima County Assessor’s Office Jayden.Fenske@pima.gov 520-724-7414 DATE: 7/2/2026 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding: TD-DIV-0626- 00035 – CIELO RESERVE LOTS 52-75 & CA A – Submittal 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ☐ Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. ☑ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: See below for the full list of generalized requirements the Assessor’s Office review for, with items in this plat needing improvement in bold and the sub bullet points. • The title block must be in the lower right-hand corner. It must have the number of lots or units or blocks, or any combination of these. It must have the common areas listed, if there are any. It must have the section, township, and range, and if it is a resubdivision, it must mention the plat name and the map and plat. o The plat map appears to resubdivide the entirety of lot 161 of Los Ranchito Number 4 recorded at Bk 7 Pg 64 M&P. However, the language in the title block includes an exception(“EXC S125’ E100’). Please review and revise this discrepancy. • The perimeter line must be solid and the heaviest line weight on the plat. The lot lines and common area lines must be solid and the next heaviest. Lines for erosion setbacks, floodplain lines, etc., should be the lightest line weight and be dashed or dot-dashed. o There are several instances where anno lies on top of lot lines and removes a portion of the line. Please move annotation and ensure that all lot lines are visible. • Name listed on the dedication line matches with owner according to Assessor records. a. For reference, our records show that property ownership of parcel 140-28-015C is held under “ACM VENTURES LLC” whereas the name listed on the dedication section of this plat is “TITLE SECURITY AGENCY LLC TRUST NO. 201665-T”. Upon recordation, these names must match or we may be unable to process the plat. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT, YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. AUTOCAD DWGS CAN BE SENT TO THE EMAIL ABOVE AND/OR ASRGIS@PIMA.GOV. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED |
|||
| External Reviewers - Pima County Wastewater (RWRD) Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The applicant is responsible for obtaining review and approval by Pima County, for projects involving RWRD sewers, on-site wastewater treatment facilities and public water systems https://www.pima.gov/1766/Wastewater-Reclamation. The applicant must provide an Approval letter from RWRD, prior to PDSD Approving the permit. | |||
| Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Site Engineering Review TD-DIV-0626-00035 2142 E GANLEY RD Summary: Final Plat for Cielo Reserve Phase II Lots 52-75 and Common Area "A" a FLD project Site Engineering comments are as follows: 1. Suzanne Mesich is no longer the City Clerk. It is now Marisa Stoller. Revise as necessary. 2. Include, “Tucson” in the title blocks. 3. Provide the actual plan number, TD-DIV-0626-00035, and the referenced Development Package number, TD-DEV-0326-00076. 4. Provide the Surveyor’s Seal where appropriate. 5. The scale on the “Plat Sheet” is 1”/30’, not 1”/20’ as shown in the top-right near the North Arrow. 6. Provide dimensions for eastbound Sight Visibility Triangle at the intersection of E Ganley Rd and Blue Yonder Ave. Correct the alignment of the Sight Visibility Triangles to comply with the standards set forth in TSM 10-01.5. See TSM 10-01.9.0 FIG 16 for alignment / sample depiction. 7. Relocate the sheet descriptions below the “Sheet Index” line. 8. Address the resubmittal requirements of the other reviewers including the condition listed by Aaron Flores of the CDRC Team. 9. Provide updated CCR’s. 10. See Administrative Manual Sec 2-07 for content, formatting, and language requirements. 11. Further comments may be forthcoming *Please submit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter stating how each resubmittal comment has been addressed* To re-submit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at: https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home The instructions for resubmittal can be found at: Revisions and Resubmittals Engineering Associate: Ryan Insalaco ryan.insalaco@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| Site Zoning Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See comments from Site Engineering. Final approval of this permit cannot be granted until approval of TD-DEV-0326-00076 is first provided. Contact Fernando Garcia, Lead Planner, Site Zoning at fernando.garcia2@tucsonaz.gov. |
|||
| CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | Please add Tucson to the lower-right corner of the location block. Also, the Approval block is outdated. Please use the new version. | |||
| CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TAA, Assessors, Addressing, TEP, and SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing and Assessors.; FYI email sent to TEP, TAA, and SWG. | |||
| Commercial Building Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Not Commercial, see Residential Building Review. | |||
| Commercial Plumbing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Entitlements Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Fire New Construction Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Nearest fire hydrant is ~120' west of proposed driveway. Furthest lot (63) is just over 700' from this hydrant. New hydrant will be needed to meet IFC 507.5.1 and IFC C102.1 requirements. | |||
| New Services/JOC Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| NPPO Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | At tentative plat/development package submittal, a NPPO or a NPPO waiver will be required for review and approval. Thank you. Chad Keller, PLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
|||
| OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | ||||
| Residential Building Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED |