Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1225-00302
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/18/2025 | Design Review Standard | NOT REQUIRED | Site is outside the Downtown Infill Incentive District (IID) and the Rio Nuevo Area (RNA). | ||
| N/A | Commercial Plumbing Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Fire New Construction Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | NPPO Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Real Estate Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | ROW Engineering Review Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Landscape Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | Site Zoning Standard | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/22/2025 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | This property is located within the Armory Park Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ). Full Historic Review is required. SPECIAL DISTRICT SUB-RECORD: You must create a Special District (SD) Sub-Record in TDC Online for your Historic Review. For instructions on how to create a Sub-Record, see: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/2/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/sub-records.pdf. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: Historic Review requires a supplemental application. Please see the Historic & Special Districts Application Instructions for more information about submittal requirements: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/special_districts_application_instructions_3.3.2025.pdf. As part of your Design Package, please include the following: project description, site plan for the subject parcel (existing and proposed), floor plans (existing and proposed), roof plans (existing and proposed), elevations, window and door schedule, photographs of existing conditions, Development Zone map for subject parcel (as described in instructions) along with precedent photographs, product names/specifications/brochures, and Arizona SHPO Inventory Form. All materials required as part of your Design Package should be combined and uploaded to your Special District Sub-Record as a single PDF. REVIEW PROCESS: Applications for projects that qualify for Full Historic Review will be reviewed by staff. Once the Design Package is deemed complete and fees are paid, staff will schedule a Full Review with representatives of the Armory Park Historic Zone Advisory Board followed by the Tucson-Pima County Historical Commission, Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS). Following board and commission review, comments will be forwarded to the PDSD Director, who makes the final decision. Conditions of approval are common and revisions to the Design Package will be required before final approval. Staff will generate a Notice of Decision and stamp the final approved Design Package. You can then resume the regular planning/building review process. QUESTIONS: For questions or to set up a meeting with Historic staff, please contact: Michael.Taku@Tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 12/12/2025 | Site Engineering Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Permit: TD-DEV-1225-00302 Location: 415 S 6TH AV Review Date: 12/12/2025 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code. Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf Site Engineering Comments: 1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1225-00302, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. Revise Sight visibility triangles, 6th AV is classified as a Collector Road. This would mean that the SVT would be 20’x265’ for the Near side, TSM 10-01.5.3 3. Revise site notes General note 9 to “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.” Administrative manual 2-06.4.7.C.2 Solid waste collection and disposal comments: 4. Revise provided trash enclosure details on sheet 13 to show with compliance with TSM 8-01.5.0 5. Provide the Waste Stream Calculations for the entire site according to TSM 8-01.8.0 6. Add the general note “A single property owner, property management company, or homeowners’ association (HOA), will be responsible for the management and maintenance of the solid waste collection services and storage area(s) for all development/business occupants.” TSM 8-01.5.1.D 7. The required clearance is 14x40 feet with a required height clearance of 25ft. TSM 8-01.0.0. Please show this required space delineated for the trash enclosures. There appears to be power lines that run directly down on the West side of Arizona AV. 8. Revise the trash enclosure on grading plan to show the ramps slope being 2% away from enclosure as well as the enclosure slab sloping 1% to the gate. TSM 8-1.0.0 Parking: 9. It is required that the parking spaces have a minimum width of 10 feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height. UDC 7.4.6.D.b Demonstrate this for the ADA parking space on the South-east portion of the development on sheet 4. 10. This to review compliance with UDC 7.4.6.F.2 & UDC 7.4.6.E.2. It is required that the required the canopy either follow the required height clearance of 15 – feet or be setback one foot or greater from the drive through lane. Sheet 6 (Grading Plan) shows Keynote #14, provide height within description Grading/Drainage: 11. Provide a keynote/callout for all buildings (Existing and Proposed) downspouts and sidewalk scuppers for the building to ensure that stormwater from roof drains, up to and including flow from the ten-year storm event, does not pass over sidewalks per Technical Standards Manual 7-01.4.3E. This should be called out on the grading plan. 12. Sheet 5 (Grading plan) shows building #2 FFE =2403.89 but sheet 3 (Site Plan) shows building #2 FFE = 2401.75. Revise accordingly to show consistency. 13. Sheet 6&7 (Grading plan) shows building #6 FFE =2402.33 but sheet 4 (Site Plan) shows building #6 FFE = 2402.48. Revise accordingly to show consistency. 14. As the drainage report shows the site experiences regulatory discharges, a floodplain use permit for work within a floodplain will be required for submission and approval in relation to the proposed site work. 15. The waiving of retention will be considered as the site shows predominantly D-Soil types. Unfortunately, detention will be remaining a requirement. It will be required that at minimum the sites discharge is at or below Pre-Development levels as required by Balanced basin requirements. 16. What is proposed to alleviate potential flooding that may occur in the underground garage during a 100-year storm event? 17. Provide a figure/exhibit that delineates the floodplain limits found along 14th St and 6th Ave within the Drainage report. Marco Contreras Engineering Associate – Site Engineering Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/08/2025 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/11/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | EXTERNAL REVIEWERS CDRC added: TAA, ADDRESSING, TEP, ADOT, REALESTATE, ENV SERV, SWG, USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TAA, ADDRESSING, TEP, ADOT, and FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG. |
||
| 12/17/2025 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | jgomes@azdot.gov on behalf of ADOT SC Traffic Engineering - ADOT CDRC Good Morning, ADOT has no comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review. |
||
| 12/11/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 12/18/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | Pima County Addressing approves of TD-DEV-1225-00302. We have assigned 120 E 14th Street as the admin address and address for building 2. Thank you, David Wilging Planner I - Addressing Division Pima County Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-724-6381 |
||
| 12/11/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 12/11/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 12/11/2025 | MITZ District Standard | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/09/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/10/2025 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/11/2025 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |