Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1224-00348
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/18/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/29/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide estimated water demand that will be served by each of the two proposed water meters. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Building sewers smaller than 8-inches shall have cleanouts located at intervals of not more than 100-feet of developed pipe length. Reference: Section 708.1.2, IPC 2018. 3. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12” below the first floor elevation of buildings 5, 9, and 11. Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is higher than the first floor elevation of buildings 6, 7, 10, 19, and 20. Provide a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
||
| 01/31/2025 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Utilities sheet. Could not locate the fire service lines for fire sprinklers on buildings #14&18. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 02/04/2025 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Site Landscape review comments for NPPO requirements. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/05/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Per TSM section 8-01 the concrete slab needs to slope 1% to the gate and the concrete ramp needs to slope 2% away from the enclosure, grading detail 12 is showing 2% on the slab and 1%-1.6% on the ramp. Revise as needed. 2. Ensure that all the standards of DSSDR 4.13 underground storage are being addressed including 7 - that requires a separate CCR for the underground storage. 3. The geotech report is showing the infiltration tests performed at 4 locations at a depth of 1 foot, but not at the location of the underground storage chamber or the depth of the bottom of the chamber where infiltration will be critical. Please address this concern and justify the assumptions made for the design of the stormwater disposal. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/04/2025 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: NEW MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1224-00348 ADDRESS: 9575 E SPEEDWAY BL ZONING: C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONING LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Once the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plans are finished a full review for compliance will be completed. 2. It is stated that a ROW Use Permit will be required. DTM review is required for all planting and irrigation in the ROW prior to the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (david.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov). Once reviewed, DTM will provide a letter, or email corresponding to their requirements or approval. Include the correspondence with your next submittal. 3. Identify the site monitor and list contact information on the NPPO Plan. Will the Landscape Architect of record for the project be the NPPO monitor? If so, provide contact information with note #5 on the NPPO cover sheet NP-1. 4. There are a few callout typos. Update as needed throughout the landscape plan set. 5. According to the tree planting detail there are supposed to remarks on the planting schedule that specify tree staking. Can a multi-trunk tree planting detail with no stakes be added to the detail sheet. Note to remove the nursery stake on all trees. 6. Possibly add a time period or caliper size for which all stakes should be removed from trees. 7. Can all of the screened rock be called out as “washed screened rock”? There have been instances out on project sites that the fines in the screened rock have been an issue for approval. If this is something that you are not comfortable with, the screened rock callout is fine. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.837.4923 |
||
| 01/31/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Speedway & Harrison Casitas - Multifamily Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1224-00348 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 31, 2025 DUE DATE: January 31, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 8, 2026. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1224-00348, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The North & East building setbacks listed under General Note 17 are not correct. Per UDC Table 6.3-4.A Nonres Use to Nonres Zone the required setback is 0’-0”. Per UDC Article 6.3.3.C Multifamily is considered a nonresidential use 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U – The Maximum Building Height listed under General Note 17 is not correct. Per Rezoning TP-MOD-0424-000003 condition 6.a the maximum height is 25’ as measured from design grade to the highest peak of the roof. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |
||
| 01/10/2025 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added Addressing, and TEP PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to Addressing, and TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 01/10/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 02/07/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REVIEW COMPLETED | Good morning, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-1224-00348. The approved addressing plan is attached. |
||
| 01/10/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 02/18/2025 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | February 14, 2025 WO#T139138 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Speedway and Harrison Casitas TD-DEV-122400348 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 1/10/2025. There are existing facilities within the development; there is a possible apparent conflict with the anchor on pole #196. This has been noted on the provided facilities map. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918- 8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department, LandReviews@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Martin Rodriguez (520) 991-5495 mrodriguez@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power |
||
| 01/10/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 01/09/2025 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/13/2025 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | DTM has no comments. |