Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1224-00328
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/14/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/05/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide the size of the proposed water meter and the expected water demand.] 2. The water meter shown on the site plan is not directly adjacent to the parcel on which the proposed apartment building is located (i.e., it is a remote water meter). Remote meters are not allowed by Tucson Water; relocate the water meter. |
||
| 02/25/2025 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Update site plan to include existing hydrants as well as fire line/water line to the building. Provide turnaround in accordance with IFC 24, D103.4 Questions: patricia.shelton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/14/2025 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See site landscape comments for NPPO Waiver requirement. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/27/2025 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1224-00328 • 106 W DELANO ST 1. Per Sec. 10-01.3.3 of the Technical Standards Manual, a pedestrian circulation path, as specified in Sec. 10-01.4.0, shall be provided along the entire street frontage of the development. A driveway apron Per PAG SD 206 and 5ft wide sidewalk Per SD 200 will be required along the property frontage. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Leigh at Richard Leigh at richard.leigh@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/14/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The waste stream calculations are using 1206 sq ft for the building but the site plan is showing the building to be 2741 sq ft. Revise as needed. 2. Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space, 3. Include a drainage report in your next submittal that addresses the site’s Detention/Retention. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/14/2025 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: 4 UNIT MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1224-00328 ADDRESS: 106 W DELANO ST ZONING: O-3 OFFICE ZONE LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY REVIEW #2 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. PREVIOUS INCOMPLETE SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. Provide a NPPO or a NPPO Waiver for the existing plants located within the development area. THE NPPO WAIVER MUST BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW. 2. Provide a set of landscape plans including a planting plan, planting details, irrigation plan, and irrigation details. - PROVIDE PLANT QUANTITIES IN THE PLANTING LEGEND. SEE COMMENT 3 BELOW FOR STREET LANDSCAPE BORDER REQUIREMENTS. - THE REQUIRED TREE IN THE PARKING AREA NEEDS TO BE IRRIGATED AS WELL AS THE REQUIRED SHRUBS/ACCENTS ALONG DELANO ROAD. A NEW WATER METER/POINT OF CONNECTION COULD BE IMPLEMENTED NEXT TO THE EXISTING WATER METER IN THE ROW. - A RAINBIRD CONTROLLER IS SHOWN ON THE RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN, BUT NO IRRIGATION PLAN IS PROVIDED? - THERE ARE IRRIGATION NOTES ON SHEET DP-2, BUT NO IRRIGATION LINES SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY AS STATED IN THE NOTE. PROVIDE THE LINEWORK FOR THE IRRIGATION LINES, CLEANOUTS, VALVES, SLEEVES, ETC., AND APPROPRIATE DETAILS FOR CONTRACTOR REFERENCE TO COMPLETE THE WORK. 3. Provide the required street landscape border along W Delano Rd. THERE IS ENOUGH AREA TO PROVIDE SHRUBS AND OR ACCENTS TO THE EAST OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK ON THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE OVER THE TOP OF THE SEWER LINE CLEANOUT. THE SHRUB/ACCENT LANDSCAPE BORDER SHOULD BE DEPRESSED 6 INCHES AND IRRIGATED. PROVIDE A SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL. CURRENT SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO COMMENTS: 4. Landscape Materials Notes: The note for 2” decomposed granite should read (2” depth decomposed granite). It is preferred that this inorganic groundcover be called out as a (sized) screened rock that includes a color and approved equal statement. 5. The south and east building foundations should be offset from the top of the water harvesting basin. The area between the building foundation and the top of basin should show positive drainage away from the building. Add spot elevations and flow lines on the water harvesting plan that depicts this. Also, see site engineering comments for any additional requirements. 6. Include a construction detail showing root barriers for trees located near hardscape areas. The concrete sidewalk near the parking lot tree will need root barrier. See Detail 402 located here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Transportation-Mobility/Landscape/Landscape-Architects 7. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, Site Engineering comments will need to be fully addressed. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect Chad.Keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 03/05/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Multifamily - 106 W. Delano St. Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-1224-00328 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 5, 2025 DUE DATE: March 5, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 07, 2025. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. This comment was not addressed, the current use is Vacant. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The existing use listed is not correct and should be vacant. Also, remove the reference to ‘UDC SECTION 4.9.7.b.6, .9 & .10” from the plan as it is not applicable. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. This comment was not addressed correctly. Based on the area called out under Note 11 there are two (2) racks shown, of which there would be 4 spaces provided. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The short-term bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1 and provide a correct calculation. 4. This comment was not fully addressed. Cleary demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.d, .e, 7.4.9.B.2.a. Also the detail does not match what is shown on sheet DP-1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a short-term bicycle parking detail that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, .2 and 7.4.9.C are met. 5. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.F Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space Additional Comments 6. This comment was not addressed. Per UDC Article 6.3.3.C multifamily is considered a nonresidential use there for per UDC Table 6.3-3.A, O-3 zone the allowed height is 40’. COMMENT: - The required building height “25’” is not correct. Review UDC Table 6.3-3.A and provide the correct height. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. |