Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1222-00090
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2023 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 02/01/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 01/30/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The maximum distance between cleanouts shall be 100-feet, measured along the developed pipe length from the upstream entrance of the cleanout (e.g. a building drain with a cleanout rim elevation of 2458.85’ and an invert of 2452.57’ is limited to a maximum horizontal length of 93.72’to the next cleanout). Reference: Section 708.1.1, IPC 2018. | ||
| 01/10/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Section D104.3 Remoteness. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. Section D105.1 Where required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet (9144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater. Section D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. Section D105.3 Proximity to building. One or more of required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15 feet (4572 mm) and not greater than 30 feet (9144 mm) from the building and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approve by the fire code official. Section D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval of the fire code official. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |
||
| 01/24/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Please include an existing conditions site plan that makes it clear what is to be removed in the existing parking lot and how it is going to tie back in to what is to remain. 2. The new 3-story buildings are placed over existing underground culverts. Clarify how and that the buildings aren't putting surcharges onto the culverts under them. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/03/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PROJECT: Tucson Spectrum Residential- ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1222-00090 Address: 5493 S CALLE SANTA CRUZ Zoning: C-3 Existing Use: graded land Proposed Use: Multi-Family TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 3, 2023 DUE DATE: January 25, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. General Note - UDC 2-10.4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data - All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 1. Engineer & LA comment - Show rooftop drainage patterns and show how they are incorporated into the water harvesting calculations. 2. Please label the existing and future rights of way for all public streets, UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. 3. Acacia salicina is not a canopy tree, please replace with a species with a denser shade canopy. 4. While an NPPO is not required, retaining the same biomass of the canopies that are existing is required. Demonstrate how the landscape has the same or increased biomass from the original plan. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package YOUR NEXT STEPS: Submit documents to the Tucson Development Center https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires changes comments) 2) Plan Set (or individual sheets) 3) Any other items requested by review staff |
||
| 01/10/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Wyatt Berger Planner PROJECT: Multi-Family Residential Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1222-00090 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 10, 2023 DUE DATE: January 26, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06, and with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is January 10, 2024. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.B – State whether the project is a resubdivision. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. See comment 8. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1222-00099, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Include rezoning case number C9-05-23 adjacent to the title block on each sheet, and remove any references to S14-035 as this final plat application does not appear to relate to the site. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – If a resubdivision is proposed, list the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – Remove the reference to maximum site coverage in General Note 17, as nonresidential uses within the C-3 zone do not have lot or site coverage maximums (UDC Table 6.3-4.A). 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d – Clarify whether this development acts as a single entity per the definition of “Site” in UDC 11.4.20, or operates within the overall surrounding development. When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Lot Consolidation Request as well as the recording information and case number for the proposed lot reconfiguration with your resubmittal. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The electric vehicle supply requirements of UDC 7.4.11 and 7.4.12 apply to this project. Demonstrate that 27 parking spaces are “EV Capable,” that 13 parking spaces are “EV Ready,” and that 2 parking spaces are “accessible compliant.” 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate how the proposed short-term bicycle parking facilities comply with UDC 7.4.9.B.1.e. Outdoor bicycle parking areas must be lighted so that they are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings during hours of use. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Show that each proposed short-term bicycle parking facility is within 50 feet of each public entrance to a building (UDC 7.4.9.C.2.a). 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The required setback to South Calle Santa Cruz is 21 feet, or the height of the building, whichever is greater, measured from the back of existing or future curb. Provide a setback dimension from the back of future curb to ensure compliance with UDC Table 6.4-5.C.1. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U – Ensure that compliance with the rezoning conditions of C9-05-23 are indicated graphically, where possible. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – General Note 20 indicates “mail service to be located in gang mail box locations.” Indicate the location of the proposed gang mailboxes to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4951. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 12/27/2022 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/29/2022 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/28/2022 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/29/2022 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/28/2022 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/01/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments |