Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1222-00088
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/16/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 05/01/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 04/18/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Comment 2 was not fully addressed: Show planned drainage direction/gutter points along the proposed building (any gutters should be keynoted). Drainage up to the 10-yr flood cannot cross adjacent sidewalks 2. The TSMR must be approved before site engineering can approve, see comments regarding pedestrian refuge 3. For APC waste disposal, ES approval is required. Please reach out to andy.vera@tucsonaz.gov, and provide a copy of his approval email in the next submittal Scott Haseman scott.haseman@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/06/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Wyatt Berger Lead Planner PROJECT: 116 N Cherry Ave Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-1222-00088 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 6, 2023 DUE DATE: April 14, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06, and with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Per UDC Section 3.3.3.G.5.c, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year expiration date is April 6, 2023. 4.7 General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Ensure any additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), are provided in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Table 7.4.6-2, the minimum width of a two-way parking area access lane (PAAL) is 24 feet. Ensure the TSMR comments provided are addressed. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – This comment was not entirely addressed. Per UDC 7.4.9.B.2.g, a bicycle rack must be a minimum of two- and one-half feet from a wall or other obstruction. Refer to UDC 7.4.9-C as an example. Demonstrate that Detail G meets this requirement. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – This comment was not entirely addressed. The required front street setback is 20 feet, or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall, measured from the street property line, whichever is greater (UDC 6.4.5.C.1.a). Based on a wall height of 9 feet, the required front street setback is 20 feet; proposed is 18 feet. Design Development Option (DDO) approval is required to reduce this setback, which was not submitted with this resubmittal. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A, when a nonresidential use is adjacent to a residential zone, the required interior setbacks are 10 feet, or ¾ the height of the proposed wall, whichever is greater. Based on a wall height of 20 feet, the required setback measured from the south lot line is 15 feet; proposed appears to be 13’-9”. Additionally, based on a wall height of 9 feet, the required setback measured from the south lot line is 10 feet; proposed is 5’-2”. Design Development Option (DDO) approval is also required to reduce these setbacks. If a DDO is pursued, add the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. The link to the DDO application may be found here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/2019_DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC.pdf. The completed application shall be submitted as “Additional/Supporting Documentation” under this activity number. Contact Georgia.Pennington@tucsonaz.gov should you have questions regarding the DDO process. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Ensure on-site pedestrian circulation and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual are met. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – This comment was not addressed. Indicate the location of any proposed gang mailboxes. If a gang mailbox is not proposed, provide a general note stating that each unit’s mail is collected individually. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Wyatt.Berger@tucsonaz.gov or at (520) 837-4951. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 04/14/2023 | TSMR/PDMR - Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See zoning comment for need of pedestrian refuge adjacent to all PAALs. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/22/2023 | TSMR/PDMR - Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Zoning will support the 5% reduction in PAAL width, however the proposed pedestrian path to the right-of-way must first be relocated so that it is adjacent to the new building to provide the required pedestrian refuge area adjacent to all PAALs (including the east side of the building). | ||
| 05/01/2023 | Zoning Modifications - DDO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | DATE: 5/1/23 FROM: Georgia Pennington, Planner COMMENTS: 1. Address all Site Zoning comments. 2. Zoning has identified an item that requires a Design Development Option (DDO). The DDO application and requirements may be retrieved from: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/2019_DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC.pdf. The completed application shall be submitted as a PDF under assigned permit number TD-DEV-1222-00088. If you have questions about this transmittal, please email me at georgia.pennington@tucsonaz.gov. |
||
| 04/12/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED |