Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1222-00071
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 01/30/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 02/13/2023 | Site Engineering | APPROVED | |||
| 02/15/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 02/15/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/09/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Building is classified as a R-2 occupancy; therefore, DP shall show the underground fire line for the new fire sprinkler system. Questions: Jennifer Peel-Davis Tucson Fire Department Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector I, II and Fire Alarm Plans Examiner Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov Desk: 520-837-7033 |
||
| 02/13/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Fire Station 5 Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1222-00071 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 13, 2023 DUE DATE: February 16, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is January 24, 2024. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index is not correct. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets of the development package. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1222-00071, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Clarify what the case numbers, C-81-22, C-86-28 & C-95-02, are for as they do not appear to apply to this site. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – Provide a general note identifying the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. This note should identify the use as Protective Service (government owned and operated only) subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.F in the R-2 Zone. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – Provide a building area expansions calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F – Clearly show the R-2 Zoning on the north end of this parcel along with a dimension. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clearly demonstrate that the required van accessible space meets the requirements of 2010 ADA Standards Section 502. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Under PROJECT DATA you list “BICYCLE PARKING: SHORT TERM PROVIDED = 0 & LONG TERM PROVIDED = 0” and then under “PROPOSED ADDITIONS PARKING CALCULAITONS: you list2 short & long term provided. Clarify what is proposed. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Per UDC TABLE 6.3-4.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE C-1, C-2, C-3, OCR-1, & OCR-2 ZONES the setbacks listed for a Nonresidential use to a Residential Zone is not correct and should be 1 ½ (H) = Height of the proposed exterior building wall. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Provide setback dimensions from the proposed additions to the north, east and west property lines. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height of the existing and proposed additions within the footprint of the building. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 01/17/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/08/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/19/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/18/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 01/25/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 02/13/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No Comments |