Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: In Review
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1124-00321
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: In Review
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/17/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | APPROVED | |||
| 01/03/2025 | NPPO | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| N/A | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| N/A | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/31/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Provide the size of the proposed water meter and backflow preventer (Water Keynote W2). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Provide the size of the proposed water service line (Water Keynote W3). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. |
||
| 01/07/2025 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | The following requirements apply to the proposed project: The 2024 International Fire Code with local amendments apply to the project Section D-105 2024 IFC: show required aerial apparatus access roads. Section 507.5.1.1. 2024 IFC: Buildings equipped with a standpipe system installed in accordance with Section 905 shall have a fire hydrant within 100 feet (30 480 mm) of the fire department connections. Provided the type of construction for the New Service bays and the new parking garage. If you have any questions, please contact me at sal.erivezjr@tucson.gov |
||
| 01/02/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. A floodplain use permit with elevation certificate is required. Please apply for the floodplain use permit as well as the building permit. 2. Please extend the synthetic fiber roll around the entire area of disturbance on sheet C8.0. Mike Ortiz michael.ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/03/2025 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: DP FOR NEW SERVICE BAYS AND PARKING GARAGE ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1124-00321 ADDRESS: 4540 E 22ND ST ZONING: C-2 COMMERCIAL ZONE This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: 1. It appears that trees could be added to the replacement curbed planter islands in the re-developed area. If trees are added for additional shade, then please depress the areas 6” for rainwater harvesting. Also grade the replaced impervious areas surrounding the planter islands to curb cut inlets if feasible. Irrigation may be available in those areas currently; otherwise, supplemental irrigation will need to be provided for plan establishment. See the following code reference for interpretation of the 25% or less expansion and landscape requirements for only the proposed expansion. UDC 7.6.2., APPLICABILITY, THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION APPLY TO THE FOLLOWING: A. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT; AND B. EXPANSION OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT, AS PROVIDED BELOW: 1. BUILDINGS GREATER THAN 10,000 SQUARE FEET ON SITES WHERE THE GROSS FLOOR AREA OF THE EXISTING BUILDING (S) IS MORE THAN 10,000 SQUARE FEET, EXPANSION IN SQUARE FOOTAGE OF LAND AREA, FLOOR AREA, LOT COVERAGE, OR VEHICULAR USE AREA AS FOLLOWS: A. IF THE EXPANSION IS LESS THAN 25%, THE STANDARDS OF THIS SECTION APPLY ONLY TO THE PROPOSED EXPANSION If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.837.4923 |
||
| 01/09/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Chapman VW New Service Bay & Parking Garage Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1124-00321 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 9, 2025 DUE DATE: January 3, 2025 COMMENTS: Resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 12, 2025. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1124-00321, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide access lane/PAAL width dimensions from the proposed service bay/parking garage north to the parking, buildings curbs, etc. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – It does not appear that the vehicle parking space calculation is correct. Vehicle display and inventory space do not count as provided spaces. The calculation shows 438 required spaces and under Provided Parking Breakdown on 348. Zoning recommends that you modify the calculation to show the number of required and provide vehicle parking space to be 438 and revise the display and inventory to be 339. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Clarify if the proposed parking garage is for display and inventory or required vehicle parking. If the proposed parking garage is for required vehicle parking provide a fully dimensioned layout so that Zoning can determine if UDC Article 7.4.6 requirements are met. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The setback shown for the south property line is not correct. Per discussions with the Zoning Administrator as the zoning boundary is located in the middle of the drainage easement this site would be considered nonresidential use to a nonresidential zone therefore the perimeter yard setback would be 0”-0”, UDC Table 6.3-4.A. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf. Sorry about that didn’t notice that the text didn’t copy. This is TD-DEV-1124-00321, new service bays and parking garage for Chapman VW at 4540 E. 22nd St., C-2 Zone. My question has to do with perimeter yard setbacks. Per UDC Article 6.4.5.B.1 perimeter yard setbacks for interior property lines are measured from the property line. There is a drainage easement to the south of this parcel and then residential south of the easement. It appears based on MapTucson that the zoning boundary runs down the middle of the drainage easement, red line shown on the plan. The property line is approximately 17.5’ north of the zoning boundary, green line. The way I see this is the adjacent zoning would be C-2 so required setback would be 0’-0”. Would you agree?. |
||
| 12/04/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/16/2024 | CDRC Review Coordinator Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC added TEP PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 01/08/2025 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 01/08/2025 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 01/08/2025 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required. | ||
| 12/11/2024 | OK to Submit - Engineering Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/13/2024 | OK to Submit - Zoning Fast | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/17/2024 | ROW Review | REVIEW COMPLETED |