Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-1124-00305
Parcel: 13348128E

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-1124-00305
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/03/2024 ROW Engineering Review APPROVED
12/30/2024 Signs NOT REQUIRED Sign Permits will be reviewed on a separate permit
12/30/2024 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
12/27/2024 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT Provide dimensioned easement and/or joint use agreement for sewer connection outside of the property line. Sections 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018.
12/30/2024 NPPO REQUIRES RESUBMIT Please see Site Landscape Comments for NPPO Waiver recommendation.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
12/26/2024 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-1124-00305
170 S HOUGHTON RD

Site engineering comments are as follows:
1. The downspout overflow outlet shown on the front view of the building elevation appears to flow over an ADA accessible route. Stormwater from a 10-year event may not be discharged from roof drains so that it passes over ADA sidewalks per TSM 7-01.4.3E.
2. Please provide waste stream calculations and show that the clear space for waste disposal vehicles is adequate per UDC 8.
3. Remove the drywell from the plans and show that the site will drain in accordance with the existing conditions.
4. Please relocate the pedestrian route to the trash enclosure. Pedestrian circulation may not pass through the vehicle stacking per UDC 7.4.7.
Ryan Insalaco – ryan.insalaco@tucsonaz.gov
12/30/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: NEW 950 SF DUTCH BROS COFFEE
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1124-00305
ADDRESS: 170 S HOUGHTON RD
ZONING: C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1124-00305, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.3

2. Prior to Site Landscape Development Package approval, please make sure Site Zoning and Site Engineering comments are addressed.

3. This is an existing site, and no protected native vegetation will be disturbed. Can the NPPO Waiver be filled out for development package completeness? Please let me know if you need a copy of the waiver and I will send the form for your use.

4. Revise the ½” minus to ½” screened rock. There have been issues with specifying (minus) rock material on projects recently. Removing the minus from the equation will hopefully remove the misinterpretation by the contractors/landscape materials suppliers. If you have any questions about this, please reach out.

5. Sheet LI-2 is duplicated (sheets 19 and 20). Remove the duplicate and update the total sheet index on the cover sheet.

6. Can two or three additional shade trees be added in the existing street landscape border close to the existing parking area? The area would benefit greatly from the additional shade.

7. All proposed landscape planting areas should be depressed for water harvesting. Add the contouring and hatch that is shown for the other depressed areas even if they are just rainfall only harvesting areas. Coordinate this information with the civil engineer and the grading plan. Example: parking area tree planting island northeast of the building corner and planting area northwest of the dumpster enclosure.

8. The plan shows a WS-5 at the south planting area. It appears to be a rainfall infiltration area only. The WS-5 is not represented in the WH spreadsheet. Coordinate for the next submittal.

9. A rainwater harvesting basin schematic detail is not a requirement but adding it to CRWHP would be a nice addition for construction clarity. If you would like to add the detail and need an example, please reach out and I will send an example of the schematic for reference.

10. Mesquites being multi-trunk trees don’t require staking. Provide a detail for a multi-trunk tree planting with no stakes and add a note to remove the nursery stake.

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.837.4923
12/26/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Ramiro Olivarez – Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Dutch Bros. Coffee - 170 S HOUGHTON RD
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-1124-00305


TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/26/2024
DUE DATE: 12/26/2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 27, 2024.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS


2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

1. COMMENT: Provide the contour interval under the North arrow on all applicable sheets as noted by the Standard above.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

2. COMMENT:

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

3. COMMENT: In addition to listed contact information, provide the applicable contact information for the Landscape Architect registrants (Brian C. Rude and Mary N. Bates) as noted by the Standard above.


2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

4. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description within the title block as noted the by Pima County Assessors information (S132' N796.84' W182' E282' LOT 8 .55 AC SEC 14-14-15).


2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

5. COMMENT: In the title block 15 pages are listed. The total number of pages listed in the sheet index is 21. Correct the title block sheet pages to 21.
6. COMMENT: In the title block for pages 16 through 21 list the applicable sheet numbers, i.e. 16 of 21, 17 of 21, etc..

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, TSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

7. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1124-00305, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.
8. COMMENT: If applicable add any additional case numbers as noted by the Standard above.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

9. COMMENT: Provide a line drawing of the project-location map with all the information as noted by Standard above and the Standards below.

2-06.4.2.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;


2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,


2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.




2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

COMMENT: It is acknowledged the use of this site is Commercial Mixed-Use. List the proposed development use of this parcel, “Food Service”.


2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

10. COMMENT: List the gross area of the overall Plaza contiguous site, that includes addresses 130, 150, and 30 S Houghton Rd.


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

11. COMMENT: This site is located within the Scenic Corridor Zone and is subject to the conditions in UDC 5.3. Add the following in the General Notes section:

The proposed development has been designed in compliance with UDC 5.3 Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ).

Signs are required to comply with the following:
- “Building or structure surfaces, that are visible from the Scenic Route, shall have colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones.”
- “Article 7A.11.3, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCA) District;”
- “Signs shall use colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones”
- “No commercial advertising sign, except a sign pertaining to a use conducted on the premises or a sign advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which the sign is located, and no billboard shall be erected within 400 feet of the right-of-way line on any Scenic Route.”


12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Clearly show the required 30’ buffer area on the Horizontal Control Plan (Sheet 8), Per UDC Article 5.3.4.A.1.
13. COMMENT: Correct the building height restriction to 30’ maximum, per UDC 5.3.5. Structure Height.
14. COMMENT: The building setback dimension is 58’ and is not in compliance with UDC 5.3.5 Structure Height. Per UDC 5.3.5.A “The maximum height of a structure is one-third the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way line” not to exceed 30’ in height for nonresidential uses.

24’ (building height) * 3 = 72’ building front street setback, minimum.

On Sheet 1, under the project data, correct to front street setback to 72’ measured from the future Right-of-Way (current). The setback was calculated from the noted height (24’) on the building elevation sheet.

In the Scenic Corridor Zone “the vertical distance of a building is measured from design grade, at all points within the building footprint, to the highest point on a roof. Any wall extending above the roof, such as a parapet wall or a fire wall, is considered part of the roof for purposes of measuring height.” (Per UDC 6.4.4. Height.)

15. COMMENT: This site is adjacent to the Scenic Corridor Zone. The building setback provided does not comply with one-third the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way line for building setback (72’). At minimum, a Board of Adjustment variance will be required. For additional information on the Board of Adjustment process please contact Mark Castro at mark.castro@tucsonaz.gov.


16. COMMENT: Demonstrate on the plan that the calculation requirements of UDC Article 5.3.6 Siting and View Corridors are met on the Horizontal Control plan. The existing south corridor will not be affected.
17. COMMENT: This site is located adjacent to a Major Streets & Route, Houghton Rd. Add in the General Notes section this proposed development has been designed in compliance with UDC 5.4 Major Streets & Routes (MS&R).

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

18. COMMENT: If applicable, add any case number in the lower right corner of all sheets as noted by the Standard above.



2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

19. COMMENT: Provide the floor area for each building as noted by the Standard above. Include the Use of each building to verify that parking for the overall Site Plaza is still in compliance with code.

2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

20. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above on the cover sheet of site plan sheet.

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

21. COMMENT: Provide the entire site calculations as noted by the Standard above.

2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes
List the following notes as appropriate:

2-06.4.7.B.1 - List the following notes on all plans/plats:
"The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall."

22. COMMENT: Add the following note as noted by the Standard above.


2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents:
"Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan."

23. COMMENT: Add the following note as noted by the Standard above.


2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes


2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

24. COMMENT: Add the following note as noted by the Standard above.


2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note
All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."

25. COMMENT: Add the following note as noted by the Standard above.



2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

26. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

27. COMMENT: If applicable to this parcel, provide the information as noted by the Standard above.
28. COMMENT: Provide the recordation cross access easement.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

29. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. This information should be annotated on the site plan, Not the aerial site plan.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

30. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above.

2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

31. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above to the south access point on the site plan.

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

32. COMMENT: Label and dimension on the site plan the information as noted by the Standard above.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

33. COMMENT: In order to verify the total number of parking spaces are met for the site: List the total square footage of each building/suite and list each use. Provide the parking calculations for each building/suite and use.
34. COMMENT: Based on the building elevation sheet it appears the drive through canopy (metal awning) is less than 15’. Per UDC 7.4.6.2. Height Clearence “The minimum height clearance along access lanes and PAALs is 15 feet.”

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

35. COMMENT: Dimension and detail the bicycle parking facility pad area on sheet 8 or add a dimensional detail of the bicycle parking facility pad area on sheet 13, in compliance with UDC 7.4.9.E.

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

36. COMMENT: See related comment 32 above (2-06.4.9.H.4).

2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

37. COMMENT: Add and label the information as noted by the Standard above.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

38. COMMENT: Demonstrate pedestrian circulation connectivity to the existing site development as noted by the Standard above.
39. COMMENT: Per UDC 7.4.7.B.2., The stacking area for drive-through lanes must not cross on-site pedestrian access. Relocate the pedestrian access that crosses the stacking area to the refuse area.


2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

40. COMMENT: Address the comment as noted by the Standard above.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

41. COMMENT: The location of the signs is acknowledged. Sign review has been added to this workflow for further review as it relates to the Scenic Corridor Zone and current sign code.


2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

42. COMMENT: See landscape reviewer comments as it relates to the Standard above.

43. COMMENT: Additional zoning comments may apply on the next submittal based on the corrected resubmittal and response to zoning comments.




If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Ramiro Olivarez at Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected development package.
11/26/2024 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
12/02/2024 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC added TEP PAG, USPS, SWG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP. FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG.
12/02/2024 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
12/02/2024 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
12/17/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) REVIEW COMPLETED December 12, 2024
WO#T135317
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: Dutch Bros Coffee AZ0906
TD-DEV-1124-00305
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted 12/2/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are
not depicted upon the plan; however, there are no apparent conflicts. Further supporting
documentation for existing facilities have been attached for reference.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Cassie Pettitt
(520) 330-2430
cpettitt@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
12/02/2024 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
12/26/2024 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
11/29/2024 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED