Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1124-00305
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.3
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2025 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 03/14/2025 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/04/2025 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Dimensioned easement and/or joint use agreement for connection to private sewer collection system not found in the current submittal. [Initial comment by Mark Masek: Provide dimensioned easement and/or joint use agreement for sewer connection outside of the property line. Sections 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018.] | ||
| 03/14/2025 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. I don’t see previous engineering comments addressed in the comment response letter, make sure to include a response to this round of comments in the next submittal. 2. The use of a dry well will be acceptable for this project on the condition that the Dry Well Standards are met from section 4.19 of the Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Manual. Please include a letter in the next submittal addressing each standard found in section 4.19 and how it is being met along with details on how the site will function if the dry-well fails or is not installed including drain-down times without the drywell. 3. Show the dimension of the bio-retention basin from the foundation of the building to demonstrate recommendations from the geotechnical report are being followed concerning drainage in close proximity to the foundation. 4. Show pedestrian circulation connectivity to the surrounding existing development. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/07/2025 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION PROJECT: NEW 950 SF DUTCH BROS COFFEE ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1124-00305 ADDRESS: 170 S HOUGHTON RD ZONING: C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE LAND USE: COMMERCIAL REVIEW #2 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting. Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed. PREVIOUS SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED: 1. Remove the reference to “minus” rock in the Materials section under the planting legend on the planting plan (sheet LP-1). Call that material “1/2” screened rock”. Possibly re-label the Materials section on the planting plan to Mulch Material and make sure the information is identical to the specification note (H) Mulch within the specification on sheet LP-2. The conflicting information could cause confusion with the contractor and landscape materials supplier during construction. 2. Remove one of the LI-2 sheets, there is still a duplicate. 3. A rainwater harvesting basin schematic detail was not added per the comment response letter. This is not a requirement yet, so it does not need to be added. CURRENT SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS: NOTE: If an approved Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan is needed for reference to help with your submittal, then please let me know and I will provide one. The following comments are intended to help with the organization and approvability of your rainwater harvesting plan. 4. WS-3 (subwatershed) on the CRWHP does not appear to be contributing to a WHIA. This area should be removed from the CRWHP and from the associate Water Budget Table. 5. Label pond 1 – WHIA-1 because it is the associated depressed landscape area with subwatershed-1. Label the northwest corner basin WHIA-2 because it is associated with subwatershed-2. “WS-5” should be labeled WHIA-3 and depressed 6” unless it is not depressed due to underground conflicts. If WHIA-3 is applicable to the water harvesting calculations, then it will include the total square footage of (WHIA-3) depressed area and its subwatershed will be the same square footage. There are additional notes provided on the CRWHP for reference to (WHIA’S and SUBWATERSHED) data organization. 6. All landscape areas should be depressed 6” even if not part of the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan calculations. Note, and show contouring and spot elevations for the additional depressed landscape areas that will receive rainfall only catchment. Coordinate this grading information on the civil plans. 7. There is a shrub outside of the property limits along the south property line. Make sure all proposed plants are within the property limits. If any proposed planting or irrigation is located outside of the property limits, then DTM review and approval will be required for the project. Thank you. Chad Keller, RLA Landscape Architect chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov 520.837.4923 |
||
| 03/05/2025 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Ramiro Olivarez – Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Dutch Bros. Coffee - 170 S HOUGHTON RD | C-1 Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-1124-00305 TRANSMITTAL DATE: 03/05/2025 DUE DATE: 03/04/2025 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 27, 2024. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the contour interval under the North arrow on all applicable sheets as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 3. COMMENT: In addition to listed contact information, provide the applicable contact information for the Landscape Architect registrants (Brian C. Rude and Mary N. Bates) as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 4. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description within the title block as noted the by Pima County Assessors information (S132' N796.84' W182' E282' LOT 8 .55 AC SEC 14-14-15). FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 5. COMMENT: In the title block 15 pages are listed. The total number of pages listed in the sheet index is 21. Correct the title block sheet pages to 21. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. 6. COMMENT: In the title block for pages 16 through 21 list the applicable sheet numbers, i.e. 16 of 21, 17 of 21, etc.. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, TSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 7. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1124-00305, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. 8. COMMENT: If applicable add any additional case numbers as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and may still be applicable. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 9. COMMENT: Provide a line drawing of the project-location map with all the information as noted by Standard above and the Standards below. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. 2-06.4.2.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes COMMENT: It is acknowledged the use of this site is Commercial Mixed-Use. List the proposed development use of this parcel, “Food Service”. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be listed on the plan set. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 10. COMMENT: List the gross area of the overall Plaza contiguous site, that includes addresses 130, 150, and 30 S Houghton Rd. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be listed on the plan set. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 11. COMMENT: This site is located within the Scenic Corridor Zone and is subject to the conditions in UDC 5.3. Add the following in the General Notes section: The proposed development has been designed in compliance with UDC 5.3 Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ). Signs are required to comply with the following: - “Building or structure surfaces, that are visible from the Scenic Route, shall have colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones.” - “Article 7A.11.3, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCA) District;” - “Signs shall use colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones” - “No commercial advertising sign, except a sign pertaining to a use conducted on the premises or a sign advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which the sign is located, and no billboard shall be erected within 400 feet of the right-of-way line on any Scenic Route.” FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be listed on the plan set. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Clearly show the required 30’ buffer area on the Horizontal Control Plan (Sheet 8), Per UDC Article 5.3.4.A.1. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted on the plan set. 13. COMMENT: Correct the building height restriction to 30’ maximum, per UDC 5.3.5. Structure Height. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be listed on the plan set. 14. COMMENT: The building setback dimension is 58’ and is not in compliance with UDC 5.3.5 Structure Height. Per UDC 5.3.5.A “The maximum height of a structure is one-third the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way line” not to exceed 30’ in height for nonresidential uses. 24’ (building height) * 3 = 72’ building front street setback, minimum. On Sheet 1, under the project data, correct to front street setback to 72’ measured from the future Right-of-Way (current). The setback was calculated from the noted height (24’) on the building elevation sheet. In the Scenic Corridor Zone “the vertical distance of a building is measured from design grade, at all points within the building footprint, to the highest point on a roof. Any wall extending above the roof, such as a parapet wall or a fire wall, is considered part of the roof for purposes of measuring height.” (Per UDC 6.4.4. Height.) 15. COMMENT: This site is adjacent to the Scenic Corridor Zone. The building setback provided does not comply with one-third the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way line for building setback (72’). At minimum, a Board of Adjustment variance will be required. For additional information on the Board of Adjustment process please contact Mark Castro at mark.castro@tucsonaz.gov. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: Zoning acknowledges a Board of Adjustment variance is being requested. The above comment will remain until a Board of Adjustment variance has been approved. Zoning cannot approve this Development Package until the Board of Adjustment variance has been approved. If approved, the Board of Adjustment variance case number shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. See related comment 8 above. *See Zoning Modifications - Variance Standard Comment: “Zoning has identified an item that requires a variance. A Board of Adjustment Variance is processed in accordance with UDC Section 3.10.3. As such, a pre-application meeting and neighborhood meeting is required prior to the submittal of an application. To request a pre-application meeting, please apply for "Pre-Application Conference" at TDC Online. If you have questions, you can email me at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov” 16. COMMENT: Demonstrate on the plan that the calculation requirements of UDC Article 5.3.6 Siting and View Corridors are met on the Horizontal Control plan. The existing south corridor will not be affected. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be demonstrated on the plan set. 17. COMMENT: This site is located adjacent to a Major Streets & Route, Houghton Rd. Add in the General Notes section this proposed development has been designed in compliance with UDC 5.4 Major Streets & Routes (MS&R). FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be listed on the plan set. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 18. COMMENT: If applicable, add any case number in the lower right corner of all sheets as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted on the plan set. If approved, the Board of Adjustment variance case number shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. See related comment 8 above. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 19. COMMENT: Provide the floor area for each building as noted by the Standard above. Include the Use of each building to verify that parking for the overall Site Plaza is still in compliance with code. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted within the plan set. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 20. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above on the cover sheet of site plan sheet. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted on the plan set. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 21. COMMENT: Provide the entire site calculations as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted/listed on the plan set. 2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes List the following notes as appropriate: 2-06.4.7.B.1 - List the following notes on all plans/plats: "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." 22. COMMENT: Add the following note as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be listed on the plan set. 2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents: "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan." 23. COMMENT: Add the following note as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be listed on the plan set. 2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes 2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." 24. COMMENT: Add the following note as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be listed on the plan set. 2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 25. COMMENT: Add the following note as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be listed on the plan set. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 26. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted on the plan set. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 27. COMMENT: If applicable to this parcel, provide the information as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and may still be applicable to be depicted on the plan set. 28. COMMENT: Provide the recordation cross access easement. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and may still be applicable to be listed on the plan set. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 29. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. This information should be annotated on the site plan, Not the aerial site plan. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be annotated on the plan set. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 30. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted on the plan set. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 31. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the Standard above to the south access point on the site plan. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted on the plan set. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 32. COMMENT: Label and dimension on the site plan the information as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted and annotated on the plan set. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 33. COMMENT: In order to verify the total number of parking spaces are met for the site: List the total square footage of each building/suite and list each use. Provide the parking calculations for each building/suite and use. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be listed on the plan set. 34. COMMENT: Based on the building elevation sheet it appears the drive through canopy (metal awning) is less than 15’. Per UDC 7.4.6.2. Height Clearence “The minimum height clearance along access lanes and PAALs is 15 feet.” FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 35. COMMENT: Dimension and detail the bicycle parking facility pad area on sheet 8 or add a dimensional detail of the bicycle parking facility pad area on sheet 13, in compliance with UDC 7.4.9.E. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted on the plan set. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 36. COMMENT: See related comment 32 above (2-06.4.9.H.4). FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 37. COMMENT: Add and label the information as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected, and it is still applicable to be added and labeled on the plan set. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 38. COMMENT: Demonstrate pedestrian circulation connectivity to the existing site development as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be demonstrated on the plan set. 39. COMMENT: Per UDC 7.4.7.B.2., The stacking area for drive-through lanes must not cross on-site pedestrian access. Relocate the pedestrian access that crosses the stacking area to the refuse area. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 40. COMMENT: Address the comment as noted by the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 41. COMMENT: The location of the signs is acknowledged. Sign review has been added to this workflow for further review as it relates to the Scenic Corridor Zone and current sign code. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable to be depicted on the plan set. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 42. COMMENT: See landscape reviewer comments as it relates to the Standard above. FOLLOW UP COMMENT: This comment does not appear to have been corrected and is still applicable 43. COMMENT: Additional zoning comments may apply on the next submittal based on the corrected resubmittal and response to zoning comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Ramiro Olivarez at Ramiro.Olivarez@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Corrected development package. |
||
| 02/28/2025 | Zoning Modifications - Variance Standard | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Zoning has identified an item that requires a variance. A Board of Adjustment Variance is processed in accordance with UDC Section 3.10.3. As such, a pre-application meeting and neighborhood meeting is required prior to the submittal of an application. To request a pre-application meeting, please apply for "Pre-Application Conference" at TDC Online. If you have questions, you can email me at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov |