Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-1123-00459
Parcel: 13312006M

Review Status: In Review

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-1123-00459
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: In Review
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/10/2024 NPPO APPROVED
12/05/2024 Site Engineering APPROVED
11/10/2024 Traffic Engineering Review APPROVED Traffic Engineering has no comments
11/12/2024 Transportation Landscape Review APPROVED
N/A CDRC Post Review PENDING ASSIGNMENT
N/A External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing PENDING ASSIGNMENT
12/02/2024 Commercial Plumbing REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Clarify the FFE for building 3. The grading plan shows building 3 with an FFE of 2538.02 but the utility plan shows an FFE of 2536.02. If the FFE on the grading plan is correct, the building will not require a backwater valve.(Similarly, the grading plan shows building 2 with an FFE of 2534.013 while the utility plan shows an FFE of 2534.013. In this case, both finished floor elevations will require a backwater valve for plumbing fixtures located on the first floor.) [Initial comment: The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH #6, 2535.37’) is less than 12” below the first floor elevation of building 3 (2536.02’). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
2. The response indicates that the initial comment was not clear. A multi-story building with a first floor elevation that requires a backwater valve may not require fixtures located on the upper floors to discharge through the same backwater valve; each floor must be evaluated separately. [Initial comment: Verify that no fixtures located more than 12” above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (e.g. fixtures located on the second or third floors) discharge through a backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018.]
12/19/2024 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) REQUIRES RESUBMIT 4350 East Irvington Road, Mailstop OH204
Tucson, AZ 85714
TEP Commercial New Business:
Lynn Colavito, PM I
(520) 651-5373
Lynn.Colavito@tep.com
Tucson Electric Power WO # T98146
December 12, 2024
Kimley-Horne
ATTN: Chris Leon and Kristina Torrence
SUBJECT: TD-DEV-1123-00459 Development Package for Broadstone Catalina Apartments – Conflict Review
Dear Chris Leon and Kristina Torrence, Kimley-Horne
We have reviewed plans for the subject project, and cannot approve please note the following comments concerning TEP Facilities and
easements:
• There are existing TEP facilities which are not depicted upon the development plans. Please resubmit development plan with TEP
facilities depicted.
• TEP’s overhead protection will have to be notified anytime a pole is exposed more than 12” from grade or when getting within 10' of
an overhead power line.
• Contact Arizona 811 from anywhere in Arizona at least two full working days prior to digging.
• Please require your contractor to access the sites below for overhead and underground protection requirements in advance of
construction activity to assure they address all overhead and excavation protection need. Please see the attached contact sheet for
additional information to share with the project Contractor.
• See attached Redline.
Please maintain drivable access to TEP poles, equipment and facilities throughout the design and during construction. The relocation of TEP
facilities such as underground feeder and 46kV and higher voltages is limited to TEP’s off-peak season, October through April. TEP poles will
remain in place until all other joint-use participants have transferred facilities from TEP poles. For the latest TEP Electric Service
Requirements and Construction Standards, please visit our web site at https://www.tep.com/Customer/Construction/ESR/.
Please notify your contractor to contact Blue Stake for the location of existing electric facilities and to comply with Arizona Blue Stake law
regarding safe approach distances and the protection of electrical facilities. Please contact TEP directly at 520-917-2617 a minimum of 10
working days in advance to request overhead or excavation protection. Overhead excavation or protection is billable to the contractor. It is the
contractor’s responsibility to protect TEP facilities. If damage occurs, the total cost to repair those facilities will be billable to the contractor.
For more information, Please have your contractor visit the TEP website at https://www.tep.com/Resources/Safety/Overhead/.
If you have any questions, please respond via email, Lynn.Colavito@tep.com
Sincerely,
Lynn Colavito
Project Manager
RMT
Enclosure(s)
CC Martin Rodriguez, Area Designer
12/10/2024 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE FOR BROADSTONE CATALINA APARTMENTS
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1123-00459
ADDRESS: 7858 E WRIGHTSTOWN RD
ZONING: C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants, and water harvesting.

Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all of the Site Landscape/NPPO Section review comments have been addressed.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Per the previous landscape reviewer’s comment: (Ensure the grading plan matches the commercial rainwater harvesting plan and the landscape plan) has not been satisfied. At bldg. no. 9 the water harvesting plans show WHIA basins with a dashed outline, but the civil grading plan does not show contouring or spot elevations that represent a depressed basin area. Revise all areas where this is occurring and coordinate the plans to match and add a note to the rainwater harvesting plans that refer to the civil grading plans for construction.

2. Is the intention to have the WHIA basins directly adjacent to the building faces? It is recommended that to have a 10-foot separation between the top of the basin and the building foundation. Maybe add a detail that shows the intent of positive drainage away from the building at 1 or 2 percent toward the top of the basin, then dropping down at a 3:1 or 4:1 slope as shown on detail number 9 - Typical Water Harvesting Basin on sheet 28 of 37. With this design comment in mind, work with the engineer to update the civil grading contours and spot elevation to match on all applicable plans in the set.

3. It appears that all of the planting areas on site could be depressed to accept rain fall only. Can a keynote be added that directs the contractor to depress all landscape planting areas including parking lot islands 4-inches to promote rainfall only water harvesting?

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
or at 520.837.4923
12/12/2024 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Broadstone Catalina Apartments
Development Package (2nd Review)
TD-DEV-1123-00459

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 12, 2024

DUE DATE: December 03, 2024

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 26, 2024.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

1. Zoning was not able to find a final plat or land split process started for this site. Provide the case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Until the final plat is approved Zoning cannot approve this TOP. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.7 – It appears that some type of land division is proposed. As this parcel was created via a plating process a final plat will be required. This plan should have been submitted as a tentative plat.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – The 10.0’ROW Easement for electrical purposes shown in the north west corner of the site and the N15.0’ of 260’ Lot 1 of Dept. of Sanitation ROW agreement shown running through the middle of the property will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

3. This comment was not addressed correctly. The provided exhibit does not address PAAL width adjacent to the proposed site wall for the 3 parcels and does not show the needed easements. Also provide a bicycle parking calculation for all 3 parcels. The parking calculation for the food service at 2323 N. Pantano Rd is not correct. As the food service is now a stand alone site the required number of vehicle parking spaces is based on a 1/100 ratio. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - As this proposed development is creating stand alone development for 7760, 7770 Wrightstown Rd and 2323 N. Pantano Rd. this DP needs to clearly show that all development requirements a met, i.e. vehicle & bicycle parking, vehicle & pedestrian access etc. or separate development packages for each site will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

4. This comment was not addressed correctly. The 4’ requirement is from the edge of rack not center, see UDC Figure 7.4.9-C. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.B.2.f are met. The minimum distance between racks is 4’ see UDC Figure 7.4.9-C.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – All new easements that are shown on the provided Catalina Village Site Plan Access Exhibit shall be shown on the DP and will need to be recorded prior to approval of this DP.

6. The TSMR will need to be approved prior to approval of this DP. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – A sidewalk is required along the northern east side of Bldg 3 and the access lane shown to the east.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: A revised development package as well as a comment response letter. To resubmit, visit the Tucson Development Center Online at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home. The instructions for resubmittal can be found at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/revisions-and-resubmittals.pdf.
12/12/2024 TW New Development Review REQUIRES RESUBMIT TD-DEV-1123-00459 - Development Package NEW v2 - 7858 E WRIGHTSTOWN RD

The following comments apply to the .pdf file named 2_Development Package_v2:
1. Sheet 13: The proposed new water service line to the existing 1½“ water meter that serves APN 13312006N is approximately 182’ long. A 1½“ water meter requires a 4” water service line when the service line is longer than 100’ feet. See Note 13 of Tucson Water’s SD-309. Please try to route the proposed new water service line for APN 13312006N between Buildings 4 & 5, so that it doesn’t have to be so long and large

2. Sheet 13: Label the new 15’ public water easement for the proposed new service line and the existing 1½“ water meter that serves APN 13312006N.

3. A re-submittal of the development package that addresses the above comments is required.

Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to:

Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer
Tucson Water, New Development Section
201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, AZ 85726-7210
(520) 837-2106
tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov
11/01/2024 CDRC Application Completeness REVIEW COMPLETED
11/04/2024 ROW Engineering Review REVIEW COMPLETED Prior addressed Comments by ROW Engineering reviewers have been addressed. Work within Right of Way for Utility or additional construction will require separate and individual permit request prior to start of work with in Right of Way..