Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1123-00459
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/02/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 12/19/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Buildings 4 and 12 do not appear to have domestic water service. 2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH #6, 2535.37’) is less than 12” below the first floor elevation of building 3 (2536.02’). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH #8, 2538.13’) is more than 12” below the first floor elevation of building 5 (2539.70’). A backwater valve shall not be installed. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH #4, 2538.32’) is more than 12” below the first floor elevation of building 10 (2539.40’). A backwater valve shall not be installed. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Verify that no fixtures located more than 12” above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (e.g. fixtures located on the second or third floors) discharge through a backwater valve. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 2018. |
||
| 12/28/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing is returning TD-DEV-1123-00459 DP for Broadstone Catalina Apartments for corrections. Please see the attached plan for comments. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 Pima County Development Services’ enhanced online permitting website is now live. Create an account to submit most applications online, and get your comments and documents directly from our portal. No more waiting for staff to email you! Start here at (https://permits.pima.gov). The Pima County Development Services Team – Your gateway to Building Safety |
||
| 02/02/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | February 2, 2024 WO#T98146 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Development Package for Broadstone Catalina Apartments TD-DEV-1123-00459 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and cannot approve the development plan submitted 11/28/2023. There are existing faciliites which are not depicted upon the plan; a new development plan will need to be received with TEP Faciliites depicted. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. If you have any Easement related questions please contact: Gabriela Bielecka Tucson Electric Power Company New Business Residential Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH 204) Tucson, AZ 85703 (520) 651-3833 Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Andres Martinez at (520) 349-0377. Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power | ||
| 12/28/2023 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See Landscape/NPPO comments. | ||
| 12/27/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1123-00459 (7858 E WRIGHTSTOWN RD TUCSON, AZ 85715) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. COTC 25-39 – The maximum curb cut width in business districts is 35’. 2. P. A. G. SD 207 page 8 provides a median with ramps detail that can be used as a pedestrian refuge to break up the 46’ curb returned PAAL on Wrightstown Rd. 3. Please add curb ramps to the proposed curb returns along Wrightstown Rd. and call out P. A. G. SD 207 on the site plan. 4. COTC 25-43 - Please restore the curb along Wrightstown Rd where the unused driveways are being removed. 5. Show the catch basins referenced in page 5 of the Drainage Report on the site plan. 6. TSM 10-01.4.1.A.1.a, SDG 2-26 - The new Street Design Guide recommends a 6’ wide sidewalk in the ROW along Wrightstown Rd (Suburban Connector in the new Move Tucson Street Typology) for greater pedestrian comfort. 5’ wide is the minimum. 7. Drainage Report: 8. The Drainage Report 2.3 Existing Onsite Hydrology describes EON-2 as discharging into Wrightstown Rd, but areal photos and storm sewer maps indicate that this watershed discharges into two transverse grate catch basins located in the ROW at the existing driveways. Will these catch basins be incorporated into the proposed driveway on Wrightstown Rd.? If so, please show them on the site plan and amend the drainage report to reflect that site runoff does not discharge into Wrightstown Rd. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov Abbreviations: City of Tucson Code (COTC), Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM), Technical Standards Manual (TSM), Street Design Guide (SDG), Pima Association of Governments Standard Details (P. A. G. SD), Access Management Guidelines (AMG), Major Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R), City of Tucson Public Utility Administrative Manual (PUAM), City of Tucson Department of Transportation and Mobility (COT DTM). |
||
| 12/28/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Show the dimension between the access lane and the new fence proposed between buildings 2 and 14, there needs to be a minimum 2’ clearance per code. 2. The northeastern side of building 3 needs a 4’ sidewalk between the building and the PAAL with vertical separation from the vehicle use area. 3. On the grading sheets show the location of the roof downspouts to verify drainage patterns and ensure that no downspouts are discharging directly onto the sidewalk. 4. As this development proposes a significant change to the existing subdivision, this will need to be re-platted. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/28/2023 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-1123-00459 PROJECT: BROADSTONE CATALINA APARTMENTS ADDRESS/PARCEL: 7858 E WRIGHTSTOWN RD/133-12-006M & 133-12-006P ZONING: C-1 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments. 2. Please include the correct Development Package number, TD-DEV-1123-00459 on all landscape & NPPO sheets. 3. List site monitor for the NPPO plan. UDC 7.7.5.C.5 4. Please label the separate irrigation meter ‘irrigation only’. TSM 4-01.6.1.A.1. 5. Ensure the Grading Plan matches the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan & the Landscape Plan. 6. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g. Then revise the Site Water Budget table to reflect these changes. 7. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. 8. Can the “Pet Park” on pg 36 be depressed to 4” and worked into one of the WHIA’s as part of the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance? – request not a requirement of resubmittal If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 12/11/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Broadstone Catalina Apartments Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1123-00459 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 11, 2023 DUE DATE: December 30, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 26, 2024. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1123-00459, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – Development Package Calculation 1 lists “373739 ACRES”, should this not be 373739 SF? 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.3 – Zoning and Land Use note 4 listed “PROPOSED ZONING IS C-1” remove this reference from the plan as no zoning change is proposed. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Wrightstown Rd is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.7 – It appears that some type of land division is proposed. As this parcel was created via a plating process a final plat will be required. This plan should have been submitted as a tentative plat. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Development Package Calculation 2 lists “2-Story Duplex”, “24-Plex” & “36-Plex” please revise this to show units as a duplex by definition is a building containing two dwelling units on a single lot or parcel. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - As this proposed development is creating stand alone development for 7760, 7770 Wrightstown Rd and 2323 N. Pantano Rd. this DP needs to clearly show that all development requirements a met, i.e. vehicle & bicycle parking, vehicle & pedestrian access etc. or separate development packages for each site will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this DP. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b from the entrance access lane off of Wrightstown Rd. to the fence called out under Keynote 18 along the west side of the access lane. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The required number of short-term bicycle parking space is not correct. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.G the required number should be 35. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clarify what the double line is that is shown around the short-term bicycle parking on detail C sheet 14. If this is some type of wall or other obstruction demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.B.2.g are met. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.B.2.f are met. The minimum distance between racks is 4’ see UDC Figure 7.4.9-C. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clarfy how the proposed 3/8” anchors shown on detail C sheet 14 will secure the bike rack in the proposed stabilized DG, UDC Article 7.4.6.B.2.a 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – It does not appear that the proposed covered parking structures shown along the south property line meet the required perimeter yard setbacks. Either a neighbors setback waive will be required, UDC Article 6.6.2.D, or a Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be submitted and approved. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the height and square footage within the footprint of all covered parking structures shown on the plan. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – A sidewalk is required along the northern east side of Bldg 3 and the access lane shown to the east. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – The “3.0 CON’C DRIVEWAY APRON” area shown along the “TYPE 1 2-STORY UNITS” needs to be a minimum 4’ wide striped pedestrian refuge area with a 24’ PAAL. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 01/02/2024 | Traffic Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1123-00459 7858 E. Wrightstown Rd. Comments: 1. A PIA is going to be required for this project. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/tdot/private-improvement-agreement Contact TDOT Engineering for information. DOT-Engineering-Review-Section@tucsonaz.gov Or call. 520-791-5100 Jesus Villezcas 2. Please provide the PIA number for approval of the DP. Construction Requirements: 1. Any existing curb which is non-compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. 2. New Concrete Curb per P.A.G. standard 209. Match existing- curb and gutter. 3. New Concrete Sidewalk per P.A.G. standard 200- must be 6’ wide. 4. Sidewalk transitions around light poles to taper at 3: 1, at back of sidewalk. 5. New Concrete Curb Access ramps at each return of the new entrance, per P.A.G. standard 207. 6. Entrance/ driveway widths wider than 35’ requires a P.A.G. standard 207 Type 1 Median Nose. 7. Existing curb cut/ driveway entrance to be closed with new P.A.G. standard 209 Concrete Curb and new P.A.G. standard 200 Concrete Sidewalk. 8. Existing catch basin inlet structure at the existing entrance to be relocated to the new entrance. 9. Bus Shelter to be relocated with coordination through Sun Tran. Please contact, Mackenzi Wintermoyer, mackenzi.wintermoyer@tucsonaz.gov 10. Show Right of Way on the plan. 11. Protect in place existing streetlights. 12. Protect in place or relocate accordingly, existing regulatory or warning signs. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 01/03/2024 | Transportation Landscape Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Comments on Dev Pkg | ||
| 12/28/2023 | TW New Development Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1123-00459 - Development Package Review v1 - 7858 E WRIGHTSTOWN RD The following comments apply to the .pdf file named 1_Development Package_v1: 1. Sheet 3: The project boundaries do not match the boundaries of APN 13312006M & 13312006P. Please revise the project boundaries to match the boundaries of those parcels or explain why the project boundaries should be different than the parcel boundaries. 2. Sheet 4: The public 3” water main constructed under File No. (FN) 3062 that runs east-west across the property to APN 13312006P has been misidentified as an EX PRIVATE WATER LINE TO BE REMOVED. Revise the label to read EX 3” PUBLIC WATERLINE FN 3062 TO BE REMOVED. 3. Sheet 4: The public 2.5” water main constructed under FN 3062 in the southeast corner of the property has been misidentified as an EX PRIVATE WATER LINE TO BE REMOVED. Revise the label to read EX 2.5” PUBLIC WATERLINE FN 3062 TO BE REMOVED. 4. Sheet 4: Show any water or public utility easements that are to be released. 5. Sheet 4: Label existing public water main PN 120-1998 and show the jog in it at Nelson Avenue as it is shown on Tucson Water’s NE051415 valve map. 6. Sheets 11, 12 & 13: Label the easement in which the new 8” water main is to be constructed. The label must include either the word NEW or EXISTING, the width of the easement in feet, and type of easement. 7. Sheet 11, Buildings 2, 3, 13 &14: Tucson Water does not allow 2½”water service lines between the water main and the water meter . A 2” water service line is required for 1½“ and 2” water meters. A 2½“ private water service line may be used between the water meter and the backflow preventer to the building. Re-label as necessary or add a detail to avoid confusion. 8. Sheet 11, Building 12: Show a water service to this building. 9. Sheet 12, Building 9: Show the size of the water service and water meter that will serve this building. 10. Sheet 12, Buildings 7, 10 & 13: Tucson Water does not allow 2½”water service lines between the water main and the water meter . A 2” water service line is required for 1½“ and 2” water meters. A 2½“ private water service line may be used between the water meter and the backflow preventer to the building. Re-label as necessary or add a detail to avoid confusion. 11. Sheet 12: Show the jog in existing public water main PN 120-1998 as it is shown on Tucson Water’s NE051415 valve map. 12. Sheet 13, Building 4: Show a water service to this building. 13. Sheet 13, Building 6: Tucson Water does not allow 2½”water service lines between the water main and the water meter . A 2” water service line is required for 1½“ and 2” water meters. A 2½“ private water service line may be used between the water meter and the backflow preventer to the building. Re-label as necessary or add a detail to avoid confusion. 14. Sheet 13: Water meters must be located within public streets, public alleys, public water easements or public utility easements. The location of the existing water meter for APN 13312006N does not meet that standard and will need to be relocated. Show the new location of this water meter. 15. A Single Phase Water Master Plan must be submitted for this project via the Tucson Development Center Online portal. Tucson Water will not be able to approve this development package until such time that the Water Master Plan has been approved. 16. A re-submittal of the development package that addresses the above comments is required. 17. Copies of the valve maps and ‘as-built’ plans referenced in these comments may be obtained from Tucson Water’s Mapping & GIS Center by sending an e-mail request for them to TWMapInfo@tucsonaz.gov. 18. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to: Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Section 201 N. Stone Avenue, #2-220 P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 tim.rowe@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 11/22/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/28/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | Addressing review required per SOP. Review request email sent per TEP. CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS, SWG. | ||
| 11/28/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS and SWG. No further action is required from customer at this time. | ||
| 11/28/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS and SWG. No further action is required from customer at this time. | ||
| 11/28/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | CDRC sent FYI email to PAG, USPS and SWG. No further action is required from customer at this time. | ||
| 12/26/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | Provide knox key switch at all electric gates. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 11/27/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/22/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 11/24/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 12/28/2023 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | No comments on Traffic Impact Analysis from DTM Traffic Engineering Division. As cited in the document, the existing roadway network and signal at Pantano/Wrightstown can accommodate for the increase in traffic caused by the proposed 250 unit apartment complex. |