Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1123-00453
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/15/2024 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 06/13/2024 | Transportation Landscape Review | APPROVED | |||
| 07/15/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/14/2024 | Historic | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | As the historic review has approved the overall site conditions proposed, staff will conduct a historic minor review once an SDRC Decision has been issued. Questions? jodie.brown@tucsonaz.gov | ||
| 06/25/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The associated floodplain use permit is in requires resubmit status, this plan can not be approved until the floodplain use permit has been re-submitted and issued. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 07/05/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Gregory School's Entrance Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-1123-00453 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 5, 2024 DUE DATE: July 14, 2024 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 21, 2024. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 1. Until this comment is fully addressed Zoning cannot approve this DP.COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Based on sheet 2 there are numerous easements in the area of proposed work. Either clearly demonstrate on sheet 3 that none of the proposed work is located within any of the existing easements or provide written approval from all entities that have rights to the easement that allows the proposed walls within the easements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 06/12/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 07/15/2024 | Signs | REVIEW COMPLETED | RE: signage – information only For: St. Gregory School site AT: 3231 N Craycroft Rd Development Package: TD-DEV-1123-00453 Reviewer: Heather Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov) Date: 07/15/24 Codes: Unified Development Code (UDC, 7A, Sign Standards), National Electrical Code (NEC), Tucson - Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC), International Building Code (IBC) Status: **review completed** for development package Thank you for the opportunity to review the development package set. Staff is familiar with the proposal for the incorporation of signage within the concrete wall system at St. Gregory School, zoned HSR. I’ve been in touch with Vanessa at Kimley-Horn and am guiding her through the Sign Design Option process for the signs, separate from the development package. Plans and diagrams have been submitted, thank you. Signs shall proceed through a separate process and permit from the development package. The signs division has no additional comments for the development package or it’s approval. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov |