Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-1123-00453
Parcel: 10926009E

Review Status: Requires Resubmit

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1

Permit Number - TD-DEV-1123-00453
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/14/2023 Commercial Plumbing APPROVED
12/22/2023 NPPO APPROVED
12/18/2023 ROW Engineering Review APPROVED No Comments

David Stiffey

David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov
11/22/2023 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast NOT REQUIRED
12/26/2023 CDRC Post Review Express PENDING ASSIGNMENT
12/19/2023 Historic REQUIRES RESUBMIT Property is within Fort Lowell Historic Preservation Zone and work requires review by the Fort Lowell Historic Zone Advisory Board (WUHZAB) and the Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS). Please submit the documents noted under a Minor Review on page 2 of the Historic and Special District informational handout (https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf). The documentation should be submitted under the Historic sub record. Questions? Contact Jodie Brown at jodie.brown@tucsonaz.gov
12/22/2023 Signs REQUIRES RESUBMIT RE: signage review aspects
For: new detached signs / walls
AT: St. Gregory School
Zoning: H-SR
Sign district: Historic 5.8.9.M and 7A.11.1
Date: 12/22/23
Reviewer: H. Thrall (Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov)


1. 7A.11.1.C - max sign area of any sign in historic residential district is 8 square feet. Dimension the lettering area on each sign wall.

2. Provide height from top of lettering to grade below for appropriate detached sign criteria, low-profile sign max 8' tall.

3. Provide setback from face of street curb to face of each sign / sign wall. (Setback should be 2 x height of lettering min., and on site.

4. Please detail the materials involved and colors, for historic review.

5. Minor historic review required for signage. Once you provide additional details, staff can facilitate the process. Should your sign package require signage code criteria alterations, a master sign program can be considered.

Please feel free to connect with me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov with any ideas, questions, etc.
12/26/2023 Site Engineering REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. A separate building permit will be required for this project.
2. This project is within a regulated floodplain and requires a Floodplain Use Permit (FUP.)
Please start a new FUP at our permit application web page:
https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home
NOTE: Documentation of a cost estimate from your contractor will be required if this project involves any reconstruction, repair, rehabilitation, structurally connected addition, or other improvement of an existing structure (including TIs and solar). Construction of separate builds/new structures does not require a cost estimate to be provided. Construction of new buildings require elevation one foot above the base flood elevation, which may require that the foundation of the building be raised as much as two feet above the existing elevation onsite. Storage buildings with no utilities may be wet floodproofed using flood vents. For all new construction buildings, two elevation certificates must be filled out by a registered land surveyor and submitted to the City, one before the foundation is poured and one after construction is completed.
Instructions:
1. Navigate into the current project in the “My Work” tab. Within the permit, navigate to the “Sub-Records” tab and click “Apply” on the Floodplain Use Permit Sub-Record
2. Locations -> Confirm the location is accurate to the project. Click “Next”
3. Type -> Fill in the “Square Feet” and “Valuation” boxes with the project area and a contractor-provided cost estimate (See note above: for new structures, input 0). Click “Next”
4. Contacts -> Confirm contacts and add any additional contacts if applicable. Click “Next”
5. More Info -> This will be filled in by the engineer assigned to your case, Click “Next”
6. Attachments -> Please attach the project plan, supporting documentation for the cost estimate (if applicable), and a drainage/hydrology report (if applicable). Click “Next”
7. Signature -> Read the statement and type your name. Sign your name below (You may Enable Type Signature to have the software sign for you.) Click “Next”
8. Review and Submit -> Review all information to ensure accuracy. Click “Submit”
Contact Lianne Evans at lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov or Stephen Blood at Stephen.Blood@tucsonaz.gov if you have any questions about the FUP.
12/22/2023 Site Landscape REQUIRES RESUBMIT ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-1123-00453
PROJECT: ST GREGORY SCHOOL
ADDRESS/PARCEL: 3231 N CRAYCROFT RD

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting.
COMMENTS:
1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments.
2. Please include the correct Development Package number, TD-DEV-1023-00413 on all landscape & NPPO sheets.
3. Please label all existing and future rights of way for Craycroft Rd. on all sheets.
4. DTM approval is required for any planting or irrigation in the ROW before the approval of the development package. Reach out to David Marhefka (David.marhefka@tucsonaz.gov), if necessary for this project

If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov
12/08/2023 Site Zoning REQUIRES RESUBMIT PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: Gregory School's Entrance
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-1123-00453

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 8, 2023

DUE DATE: December 24, 2023

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 21, 2024.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1123-00453, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – The sections corners labeled on the location map are not correct.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.1 – As this parcel has split zoning, SR & HSR revise Land Use note 3 to include both zones

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The existing and proposed use listed in Land Use note 4 is not a use as classified in the UDC. Review UDC Table 4.8-1, Civic Land Use Group With Land Use Class/Type: and provide an existing and proposed use as classified in the UDC along with the applicable Use Specific Standards.

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – As it appears that the proposed wall is located within the HSR Zone Historic review is required. Historic review is required and must be approved prior to approval of this building plan. Historic application/requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Historic-Preservation

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Craycroft Rd. is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – Based on sheet 2 there are numerous easements in the area of proposed work. Either clearly demonstrate on sheet 3 that none of the proposed work is located within any of the existing easements or provide written approval from all entities that have rights to the easement that allows the proposed walls within the easements.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Clearly show the location of the split zoning SR/HSR on the plan.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b are met from the proposed columns to the access lanes.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter.
11/16/2023 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
11/22/2023 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED External Reviewers not required.
No further action is required from customer at this time.
11/27/2023 Fire New Construction REVIEW COMPLETED
11/17/2023 OK to Submit - Landscape Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
11/16/2023 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED