Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1123-00451
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2024 | External Reviewers - COT Parks & Recreation | APPROVED | Approved TD-DEV-1123-00451 10048 E OLD VAIL RD TUCSON, AZ 85747 City of Tucson Parks and Recreation has no additional requirements for the Development Plan. Regards, Joe Barr Project Manager Tucson Parks and Recreation | ||
| 03/13/2024 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | APPROVED | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing approves TD-DEV-1123-00451. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager – Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 02/16/2024 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | APPROVED | February 16, 2024 WO#T98085 City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: CDRC Admin Team Dear CDRC Admin Team Subject: Development of Whataburger Restaurant with Drive-Thru, with parking and landscape areas. TD-DEV-1123-00451 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted 02/08/2024. There are existing facilities within the development which are not depicted upon the plan; as such, there are potential conflicts with the proposed installation facilities on the Southeast. Facilities are shown in the response map. Protect in place. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you have any easement questions, please contact our land Resources Department, TEPDEVREV@tep.com. Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer, Cruz Vega (520) 349-9850 cruzvega@tep.com Sincerely, Design Admins Design Admins Tucson Electric Power | ||
| 03/18/2024 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 03/18/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Show how storm water is to be prevented from entering the sanitary drain system at the trash enclosure. Reference: Section 1101.3, IPC 2018. | ||
| 02/28/2024 | NPPO | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | See landscape comments. | ||
| 03/11/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1123-00451 10048 E. Old Vail Rd. Comments: 1. On the Site Plan, Sheet 6, Site Plan-Keynote No. 2A, mentions “Accessible Ramp by others.” But however, since this is in the Right of Way and adjacent to this property (10048 E. Old Vail Rd,) if a New Curb Access Ramp is to be constructed at this location, it must be on the plan for this job. The Curb Access Ramp must be constructed per P.A.G. standard 207 and must be labeled on the plan. 2. Any existing curb or sidewalk that is not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/11/2024 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf TD-DEV-1123-00451 1. The site is located in a balanced basin and requires balanced basin detention compliant with Chapter 3 of the DSSDR. Tables 1 and 2 indicate that the peak discharges for all storm events are significantly increased post-development compared to pre-development. The 2-, 10-, and 100- year storm event peak discharge must be the same or reduced post-development compared pre-development. 2. First flush retention cannot be provided in underground storage without approval from the engineering manager according to DSSDR Chapter 4.13.2 City of Tucson edit 3. Indicate in the drainage report that first flush retention requirements for the site are being met in aboveground basins or reach out to Stephen Blood at Stephen.Blood@tucsonaz.gov for approval. 3. Explain in the Proposed Storm Water Management Design Intent section the intention of Temporary Basin 1 and in what way it is temporary. 4. Provide a figure similar to Table 2.2 in the Stormwater Detention-Retention Manual to demonstrate that first flush requirements are being calculated correctly. 5. Provide a reference in the drainage report that addresses all 8 requirements for underground storage standards listed in DSSDR Chapter 4.13.1. 6. Provide an exhibit that shows the pipe system that directs water into the City storm drain system as proposed in section 4.6 of the drainage report. 7. Provide waste stream calculations compliant with TSM 8-01.8. Please note that although recycling service is not required, the site must provide capacity for recycling service so a double enclosure or two single enclosures will be required. 8. Show the inlets to the proposed underground storage system and the proposed pipe system into the City storm drain system on the grading plan in the civil package. 9. Maximize water harvesting into the landscaped areas through the use of flush curbs and curb cuts. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 02/28/2024 | Site Landscape | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | ACTIVITY NO. TD-DEV-1123-00451 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 10048 E OLD VAIL RD/ 141-186510 ZONING: pad-36 This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-11 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for landscape, native plants and water harvesting. COMMENTS: 1. Ensure all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed prior to the Landscape/NPPO comments. 2. Identify the site monitor and list contact information for the NPPO. 3. Please move the inventory to the actual plan sheet – it may run vertical to save space. 4. Please label all existing and future rights of way for all streets. 7.6.4.C.2.a. on all sheets 5. Show all site visibility triangles on plan set sheets. 6. Include a root barrier detail for trees located near asphalt or sidewalk. 7. The Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Plan must match the Grading Plan. 8. If using d.g at a 2” depth, ensure the rainwater harvesting basins are 8” in depth to account for the d.g. Then revise the Site Water Budget table to reflect these changes. 9. Include spot grade on the CRWH Plan.TSM 4-01.4.3.2C 3a-iii 10. Identify curb inlets/splash pads to landscape areas on grading and water harvesting plans. 11. Please correct the Site Water Budget so it gives the actual percentage of irrigation needs met by commercial rainwater harvesting. If you have any questions about these comments, I can be reached at Matthew.Carlton@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 03/04/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Whataburger – Houghton Town Center Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-1123-00451 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 4, 2024 DUE DATE: March 10, 2-24 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 19, 2024. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. This comment was not fully addressed. Starting at sheet 18 - 25 the sheet number and total number of sheets is not correct. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) shall include the landscape sheets. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Starting at sheet 18 - 25 no case number was provided.COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1123-00451, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile. 4. This comment was not fully addressed. Show the PAD boundaries on the map. COMMENT: 2-06.4.6 – As this project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD)-36, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 5. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - Provide the required Zoning Documentation Table on the plan, see PAD-36 Section C.1. This table shall show all existing/proposed development within PAD-36. Contact the Owner/Developer for information on prior approved development. This table shall include a running Floor Area Ratio calculation for the entire PAD that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.6. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Clarify when the “24’ CRITICAL ACCESS BY MASTER DEVELOPER” will be constructed. If this access will not be completed by the time of C of O for this development some type of barrier is required to prevent vehicles from accessing this area, UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. 7. This comment was not addressed. The calculation does not state the number of van accessible spaces required and provided. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the number of required and provide accessible parking space to include van accessible spaces. 8. This comment was not fully addressed correctly. The wheel stop location dimension is not correct. Review UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 and provide the correct dimension. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Provide a typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. This detail shall include a wheel stop location dimension, 7.4.6.H.3. 9. This comment was not addressed. The detail does not address UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.b.2.a & .g. The configuration of the inverted loop and the 2’ x 6” parking space is not correct. Review UDC Figure 7.4.9-C and provide the correct configuration. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Detail 4 sheet 7 shall clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.d, & .e, 7.4.9.B.2.a, .f, & .g are met for the short-term bicycle parking. Also, for your information per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d a single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles. 10. This comment was not fully addressed. Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of 7.4.9.D.5 are met. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Provide a detail for the required long-term bicycle parking that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D are met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 02/08/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/01/2024 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 03/11/2024 | Traffic Engineering Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | TD-DEV-1123-00451 10048 E. Old Vail Rd. Comments: 1. On the Site Plan, Sheet 6, Site Plan-Keynote No. 2A, mentions “Accessible Ramp by others.” But however, since this is in the Right of Way and adjacent to this property (10048 E. Old Vail Rd,) if a New Curb Access Ramp is to be constructed at this location, it must be on the plan for this job. The Curb Access Ramp must be constructed per P.A.G. standard 207 and must be labeled on the plan. 2. Any existing curb or sidewalk that is not compliant with current standards will be modified or replaced to meet current standards. David Stiffey DTM Project Coordinator David.Stiffey@tucsonaz.gov |