Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1123-00448
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/25/2024 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 02/23/2024 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 03/26/2024 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 02/23/2024 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1123-00448 (1709 S CRAYCROFT RD TUCSON, AZ 85711) 2nd Review Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. TSM 10-01.4.1.B – As the existing sidewalk is less than 4’ wide, a 6’ sidewalk should be constructed along the entire frontage along Craycroft. This comment was not fully addressed. “TSM 10-01.4.1a. All projects which require a new sidewalk will provide a sidewalk with a minimum width of five feet along local streets and six feet along collector and arterial streets…” “TSM 10-01.4.1.b. All projects which have an adjacent existing sidewalk less than four feet in width will provide a sidewalk with a minimum width of five feet.” Please show a new ‘6 wide sidewalk on the site plan. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov Abbreviations: City of Tucson Code (COTC), Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM), Technical Standards Manual (TSM), Street Design Guide (SDG), Pima Association of Governments Standard Details (P. A. G. SD), Access Management Guidelines (AMG), Major Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R). |
||
| 03/26/2024 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Enterprise Car Rental – 1709 S. Craycroft Rd. Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-1123-00448 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 26, 2024 DUE DATE: March 18, 2024 This comment was not addressed. COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 19, 2024. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1123-00448, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As Craycroft Rd. is designated as an Arterial on the COT MS&R Map provide a general note on the cover sheet stating “THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.E – As this site is made up of two (2) parcels, 131-09-2280 & 131-09-2290, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Assessor’s Combo Request form with your next submittal. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – As you are proposing a gated entry demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 are met from the turnaround space to the proposed gate. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – The proposed “24.0’ PAAL” shown between the proposed building and carwash does not meet the definition of a PAAL, UDC Article 11.4.17 definition of a PAAL. Revise the plan to show access lane. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.4-1, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Vehicle Sales, and provide a calculation that meets the requirements. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The short- & long-term bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Review UDC Table 7.4.8-1, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Vehicle Rental and Sales, and provide a calculation that meets the requirements. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.d, & .e are met. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Clearly demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D.5 are met. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.J - As Craycroft Rd. is not at full width, 120’ future right-of-way (ROW), and dedication is not required, provide the following information on the plan, Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc. The site needs to either be developed to clearly show that all development requirements are met to the future ROW or a Future right-of-way site plan needs to be provided that clearly demonstrates how the site will meet code when the right-of-way is taken along with a recorded MS&R covenant. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – The south perimeter yard setback listed under Development Package Calculation Note 3 is not correct. Review the zoning of the adjacent property to the south along with the requirements shown under Table 6.3-4.A and provide the correct perimeter yard setbacks. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - The proposed striped area shown along the north end of the proposed building is required to be a sidewalk meeting the requirements of TSM Sections 7-04.1.B, 7-01.4.2 & 7-01.4.3. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – A sidewalk meeting the requirements of TSM Sections 7-04.1.B, 7-01.4.2 & 7-01.4.3 is required along the east side of the proposed building and the west side of the proposed carwash, TSM Sections 7-04.1.B 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 02/16/2024 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED |