Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1122-00049
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 07/07/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 07/07/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. The floodplain use permit for this development will need to be applied for and processed before issuance of this Tentative Plat. 2. It looks like the lots have changed from the last submittal. General notes 8 and 9 will now need to be revised. Note 8 needs to include lots 1-5 as affected by the floodplain, and note 9 needs to be revised to read lots 4 and 5. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 06/30/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Broadway Wilmot Plaza Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-1122-00049 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 30, 2023 DUE DATE: July 26, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is December 11, 2023. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. This comment was not addressed. Based on the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Access and Parking Easement, Recital C, the owners have heretofore operated the Properties as an “integrated s hopping center”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.2 – As Parcel “B” cannot stand alone, i.e. vehicle parking, access etc. the parcel shall be included in the gross area of the site. 2. The comment was not fully addressed. Per UDC Table 4.8-4 General Merchandise Sales subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.9.B.3 and 4.9.13.O, and Food Service is subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.4.M.1 & 5 and 4.9.13.O. Add the Use Specific Standards to the note. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – General Note 3 is not correct. “RETAIL” is a use group not a use. Provide a use as classified per the UDC. Also review UDC Table 4.8-4: PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES, C-1 ZONE and provide all applicable Use Specific Standards that apply to the uses. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. This comment was not addressed. Based on the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Access and Parking Easement, Recital C, the owners have heretofore operated the Properties as an “integrated s hopping center”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Provide the square footage of the building shown on Parcel “B”, see comment 3 above. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – Sheet 2 & 5 show the square foot of the now BLDG 5 as 2,200 plus a 440 square foot patio for a total of 6,640 SF. sheet 1 under PROPOSED BLDG 5 AREA” the total listed is 2,600 SF, clarify which is correct. 5. This comment was not addressed. Based on the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Access and Parking Easement, Recital C, the owners have heretofore operated the Properties as an “integrated s hopping center”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – The expansion shall include the existing building square footage of Parcel “B”, see comment 3 above. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide width dimension for the drive-thru lands shown for now BLDG 4. 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Provide a PAAL width dimension from the new curb shown at the far west end of the development area for now BLDG 4 to the vehicle parking spaces to the west. 8. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking spaces calculation shall clearly show the number of required and provided accessible parking spaces to include the number of required and provided van accessible spaces. Detail E sheet 4 does not meet the width requirements for a van accessible vehicle parking space, see ICC A117.1, Section 502.2. 9. The document will need to be recorded prior to approval of this DP. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Some type of cross access/parking agreement or easement is required for this site. Provide a copy of the recorded documents with the next submittal and provide the recordation information on the plan. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Based on sheet 5 and detail M sheet 8 there are 3 bicycle racks shown for a total of 6 short-term bicycle parking space provided for now BLDG 5, UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d. Under Development Standards sheet 1 there is no reference to BUILDING 5 that addresses the number of required and provided short-term bicycle parking spaces. 11. This comment was not addressed. Based on the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Access and Parking Easement, Recital C, the owners have heretofore operated the Properties as an “integrated s hopping center”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q – Provide the square footage, height and specific use of each building within footprint of the building(s). This includes Parcel “B”. 12. Keynote 4 states “SEE PLAN FOR WIDTH” but there are no dimensions or widths provided on the plan around now BLDG 4. Based on parking vehicles being allowed to overhang the sidewalk along the north side of the building the minimum width is 6’-6”. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Provide a sidewalk width for the sidewalk shown along the north & west side of BLDG 3. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B & 7-01.4.1.D clearly show the required sidewalk, pedestrian circulation that connects now BLDG 5 to the remaining buildings on site. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and detailed comment response letter. |
||
| 06/26/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED |