Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1122-00021
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.1
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | APPROVED | |||
| 09/01/2023 | NPPO | APPROVED | |||
| 09/01/2023 | Site Landscape | APPROVED | |||
| 10/02/2023 | CDRC Post Review Express | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 09/25/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf TD-DEV-1122-00021 1. Provide a close-up site plan such as sheet C101 from previous submittals. 2. The provided waste stream calculations are incomplete. Provide calculations that justify the size choice of the dumpster based on collection frequency as demonstrated in TSM 8-01.8 B. The provided calculations show that more than 10 cubic yards of waste would be produced weekly and with once a week collection the proposed 8 cubic yard dumpster is not adequate. 3. There is only one dumpster enclosure proposed on the site. Please address comment 7 from the previous review. 4. Curb cuts have not been shown on the plans. Please address comment 15 from the previous review. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 09/26/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: CAP Storage – Old Vail Development Package (2nd Review) TD-DEV-1122-00021 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 26, 2023 DUE DATE: September 30, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is July 05, 2024. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 – The sheet index shows 22 sheets but only 21 sheets were submitted. The drawing index shows a sheet C101 but no sheet C101 was provided. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. This comment was not addressed correctly. The total number shows 22 but only 21 sheets were provided. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.D – The total number of sheets shown within the title block shows 24 but only 14 sheets were submitted. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide both tables as shown on DP14-0248 and provided all headings for all columns. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. Provide updated Proposed Lot & Common Area Breakdown and Actual Lot & Common Area Breakdown (Req’d/Provided) charts on this DP, reference DP14-0248 & TD-DEV-0623-00278. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. The comment was not addressed. As sheet C101 was not provided and Zoning was not able to find a reference to “jersey barriers” on the plan clearly show the proposed barriers on the plan and provide a detail. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – At the north end of the access lanes along the east and west side of the building demonstrate how UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 are met. 5. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide both tables as shown on DP14-0248 and provided all headings for all columns. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Until the required updated Proposed Lot & Common Area Breakdown and Actual Lot & Common Area Breakdown (Req’d/Provided) charts are provided Zoning cannot determine if the required and provided vehicle parking is met. 6. This comment was not fully addressed. As sheet C101 was not provided Zoning cannot verify that the note was updated. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.a are met. 7. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide both tables as shown on DP14-0248 and provided all headings for all columns. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Ensure that the required Proposed Lot & Common Area Breakdown and Actual Lot & Common Area Breakdown (Req’d/Provided) charts are updated to show the current number of bicycle required and provided. 8. Zoning acknowledges that wheel stops are proposed. Show the wheel stops on the ‘PARKING STALL DETAIL” and provide a location dimension that meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – As parking vehicles are allowed to overhang sidewalks clearly demonstrate that the sidewalk meets the minimum width of 4’-0”, TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A. Minimum width for a sidewalk where parking vehicles are allowed to overhang is 6’-6”. 9. As sheet C101 was not provided Zoning cannot verify that the note was provided. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also, provide a general note stating all signs require separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & detailed response letter. |
||
| 08/24/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness Express | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 09/22/2023 | Fire New Construction | REVIEW COMPLETED |