Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Permit Number - TD-DEV-1122-00018
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE REVIEW v.2
Review Status: Requires Resubmit
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/01/2023 | NPPO | APPLICATION INCOMPLETE | No grading,landscape, irrigation, water harvesting or native plant plans. | ||
| 05/01/2023 | Site Landscape | APPLICATION INCOMPLETE | See comments under NPPO | ||
| 05/19/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing | NOT REQUIRED | Good afternoon, This project does not require review by Pima County Addressing. The applicant may submit for unit numbers after the DP is approved. Nicholas Jordan Site Review Project Manager - Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
||
| 05/19/2023 | Historic | NOT REQUIRED | |||
| 05/30/2023 | CDRC Post Review | PENDING ASSIGNMENT | |||
| 05/22/2023 | Commercial Plumbing | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | 1. Revise the site drawing to include the closest fire hydrant. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Show the size of the sanitary sewer, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 3. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 714.1, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. |
||
| 05/25/2023 | External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Hello, The following are ES comments to TD-DEV-1122-00018: Depict APC (automated plastic container/s) placement within DP per TSM 8-01.6.3. Refer to figure 8 for spacing requirements. There does not appear to be adequate curbside space to support 5 units and up to 10 (5 trash and recycle each) APC’s. Please demonstrate otherwise. Please feel free to contact me regarding this review. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 |
||
| 05/01/2023 | Fire New Construction | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | -Assuming the building is occupancy type R2, fire sprinklers will need to be installed IFC 903.2.8. Make notes on plans that fire sprinklers will be installed. Include underground fire line on drawings. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
||
| 05/30/2023 | ROW Engineering Review | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | TD-DEV-1122-00018 (135 N HOFF AV TUCSON, AZ 85705) Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter which states how all comments were addressed. Comments: 1. Please clarify the proposed driveway apron(s) with a detailed drawing showing what will be replaced and what will remain. Please include dimensions. Is the proposal to extend the existing shared driveway apron? 2. The maximum driveway widths can be found in City of Tucson Code, Sec. 25-38. Max width 20’, max width for 2 adjoining properties 30’, minimum distance between curb cuts 12’. 3. UDC 7.4.6.K – City code does not allow backing up directly onto the street from on-site parking. (also see City of Tucson Code Sec. 25-42) 4. Keynote 11 should reference “P.A.G. SD 206.” 5. Reach out to Jodie Brown, Historic Preservation Officer, about the proposal to move the street light. jodie.brown@tucsonaz.gov 6. TSM 10-01.4.0 The Site Cross Section on page 2 seems to indicate a 6% cross slope on the side walk, please clarify. Sidewalk should have a maximum 2% cross slope. Faffs Riederer Faffs.Riederer@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/16/2023 | Site Engineering | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | Tucson codes and ordinances can be found online at https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/tucson/latest/overview The Stormwater Detention-Retention Manual can be found online at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/updated-retention-detention-manual/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf TD-DEV-1122-00018 1. Maximize water harvesting to any required landscaping. 2. Show directions of roof drainage. Drainage from the roof cannot go over ADA accessible sidewalks and must be directed under the sidewalk through scuppers or around walking paths through gutters. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 05/10/2023 | Site Zoning | REQUIRES RESUBMIT | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: 135 N. Hoff Av. – Multifamily Development Package (1st Review) TD-DEV-1122-00018 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 10, 2023 DUE DATE: May 20, 2023 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also, compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is April 26, 2024. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.2 – All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 – Provide an email address for the Surveyor listed on sheet 1. 3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 – Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1122-00018 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4 – The location map shall be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.B - Identify all streets that abut the subject property on the location map. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4.C – Once the location map is drawn to the required scale additional section corners may need to be shown. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – If applicable list additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – Per UDC Article 5.12.6.F.3 as you are proposing demolition of a contribution structure the IID may not be used for this project. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b – As multifamily is considered a nonresidential use remove the reference to lot coverage from the plan as it is not applicable, see UDC Article 6.3.3.C and Table 6.3-4.A. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Per UDC Article 7.4.6.K A street or alley cannot be used for maneuvering directly into or from any parking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way, a Board of Adjustment for Variance maybe required. 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.A all required vehicle parking spaces shall be provided on site. 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table TABLE 7.4.4-1: RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings - 0-70 units/acre a 2 bedroom unit requires 2 spaces and a 3 bedroom unit requires 2.25 spaces. A Board of Adjustment for Variance or a Individual Parking Plan will be required to reduce the number of required vehicle parking spaces. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – The vehicle parking space calculation shall include the number of accessible vehicle parking spaces required and provided. Per 2018 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1106.5 the required accessible space is required to be van accessible and meet the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.2. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The number of required short-term bicycle parking spaces is not correct and should show 2 required. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – The proposed location of the short-term bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of 7.4.9.C.2.(1). C. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Demonstrate on the plan or detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1e are met. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O – Based on amendments to the UDC adopted April 21, 2023, the “FRONT” setback shown is not totally correct. The amendment removed the “1-1/2H” requirement. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Martell at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
||
| 04/20/2023 | CDRC Application Completeness | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/27/2023 | CDRC Review Coordinator | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 05/10/2023 | Design Review | REVIEW COMPLETED | Your property is within the boundaries of the Downtown Infill Incentive District (IID). If you are planning to use the IID as a tool for development/redevelopment, please submit a Special Districts application as a sub-record of this permit. Please see the Special Districts Application Instructions and the Infill Incentive District (IID) Design Review Process guide for a complete list of requirements and an overview of the IID design review process: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Special_Districts_Application_Instructions.pdf https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/Process_Handouts/IID_Application_and_Review_Process.pdf |
||
| 05/01/2023 | External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) | REVIEW COMPLETED | <jgomes@azdot.gov> Good Afternoon, ADOT does not have any comments on this DEV. Thank you for the opportunity to review! | ||
| 04/27/2023 | External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/27/2023 | External Reviewers - Southwest Gas | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/27/2023 | External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/27/2023 | External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) | REVIEW COMPLETED | SENT FYI EMAIL PER SOP. | ||
| 04/25/2023 | OK to Submit - Engineering | REVIEW COMPLETED | Because no grading quantities have been provided as requested in the last review, grading and SWPPP have been removed from the scope of work. Lianne Evans lianne.evans@tucsonaz.gov |
||
| 04/26/2023 | OK to Submit - Landscape | REVIEW COMPLETED | |||
| 04/27/2023 | OK to Submit - Zoning | REVIEW COMPLETED |