Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: TD-DEV-1025-00276
Parcel: 11714087D

Address:
375 S STONE AV

Review Status: In Review

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2

Permit Number - TD-DEV-1025-00276
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE NEW v.2
Review Status: In Review
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/05/2025 NPPO Standard APPROVED
N/A Real Estate Standard PENDING ASSIGNMENT
12/03/2025 Design Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT This proposal does not match the IID Design Package approved on 12/18/2019 and the IPP approved on 10/15/2019, both under Activity # T19SA00338. A presubmittal conference for a preliminary discussion with the Design Professional, Entitlements and Historic Preservation staff has been scheduled under TP-PRE-1125-00242. After the preliminary discussion with the Design Professional and staff, a complete Design Package will need to filed following these instructions: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/3/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/special_districts_application_instructions_7.18.23.pdf. If you have any questions, please let me know: maria.gayosso@tucsonaz.gov. Thank you.
12/08/2025 Entitlements Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Development does not conform to the approved preliminary development plan in rezoning case C9-19-21. A modification of zoning conditions is required, if you haven't already please apply for a pre-application meeting to discuss with Entitlements, Special Districts and Historic review teams.
11/18/2025 External Reviewers - COT Environmental Services Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Environmental Services comments:
1. Must include provisions for both trash and recycle services. TSM 8-01.1.0.
2. Sheet 6, Trash Enclosure Detail, must call out all dimensions and details; measurement of gate opening, structural design of gate and CMU wall, post barricade type A (bollard) measurement between inside face of wall to center of inside face of bollard, etc. Refer to TSM 8-01.5.2 and 8-01.9.0 Figures 2, 3A & 3B, and 4, for minimum design requirements.
3. Clarify how all users will dispose of the trash/recycle materials into the compactor.
4. Identify type of compactor and method of collection (i.e. stationary compactor with proposed 8cy container). Will the service vehicle be accessing the area directly to the compactor, if so, clarify how this will be done. If the container is going to be rolled out to a designated area where the service vehicle will perform the service operation then clarify such. Must identify where the point of collection will be if rolled out and that All Saints staff will roll containers out to designated service area when service vehicle arrives to perform the collection of trash and recycle. Containers are not to be stored in the right-of-way. Refer to TSM 8-01.5.3, 8-01.5.4.

Feel free to contact me regarding these review comments.

Andy Vera
(520) 837-3798
Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
12/16/2025 External Reviewers - Tucson Electric Power (TEP) Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT 4350 E. Irvington Road
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702
December 15, 2025
WO#T168954
City of Tucson
Planninf and Development Services
Attn: CDRC Admin Team
Dear CDRC Admin Team
Subject: All Saints - Site 1
TD-DEV-1025-00276
Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed and cannot approve the
development plan submitted 11/7/2025. There are existing facilities within the
development which are not depicted upon the plan. COMMENTS ONLY PLEASE
INDICATE APPROVAL WITH THE BELOW CHECK BOX PLEASE DO NOT ADJUST
IF THERE ARE NO COMMENTS Further: Easement will be required for new
transformer location.
Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the
existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.
To apply for electric service, please call the New Construction department at (520) 918-
8300. Please submit a final set of plans including approved site, electric load, paving
off-site improvements and irrigation plans. If available, include a PDF version of the
plans.
If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Should you
have any easement questions, please contact our Land Resources Department,
LandReviews@tep.com.
Should you have any technical questions, please contact the area designer,
Fred Quintero
(520) 235-6329
fquintero@tep.com
Sincerely,
Design Admins
Design Admins
Tucson Electric Power
12/02/2025 Fire New Construction Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT 1. Show location of fire dept. connections. Fire hydrant shall be within 100' of the fire dept. connection. IFC 2024 507.5.1
2. Include a separate sheet showing all aerial access requirements per IFC D105.1.
john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov
5203495581
12/01/2025 Historic REQUIRES RESUBMIT Historic review is required for any project on this parcel per Ordinance No. 11933 (relating to Rezoning case C9-19-21): 1) The proposed demolition of the existing garage on site is subject to full approval pursuant to the Unified Development Code (UDC) 5.8.10.E., which requires an application for demolition that includes "Reasonable Economic Use" documentation, a replacement plan, review by the Armory Park Historic Zone Advisory Board, the Plans Review Subcommittee (PRS) of the Tucson-Pima County Historical Commission, and approval by Mayor and Council. 2) Historic review of the proposed new construction on site is also required per the ordinance which states, "Exterior details on the proposed mixed-use building shall be historically compatible, per the UDC's Historic Preservation Zone Design Standards (Section 5.8.9). Next steps in the Historic review include the following: Create a Special Districts sub-record (see instructions: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/2/pdsd/documents/tdc-faq/new-pdfs/sub-records.pdf); submit a Design Package for the proposed new construction on site (see instructions: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/special_districts_application_instructions_3.3.2025.pdf). For questions, reach out to desiree.aranda@tucsonaz.gov.
12/09/2025 ROW Engineering Review Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Traffic Impact Analysis required.
New sidewalk on Stone Ave should be 6'.
Add Street names to Sections on Sheet 7, add dimension sidewalk to P/L.
Replace ADA ramp on SW corner of Stone and 14th St, dedicate 25' radius.
ADA onsite pedestrian circulation is missing on Stone Ave
Prop 411 pavement restoration project planned on 14 St. Visit https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/d27da45cb874439496f3619c1588f572 for more information.
11/20/2025 Site Engineering Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT Permit: TD-DEV-1025-00276
Location: 375 S STONE AV
Review Date: 11/20/2025

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with applicable development criteria in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-6 and Technical Manual (TM) Section for waste management, Pedestrian Access, Hydrology -Retention/Detention Requirements, and all site standard code.

Drainage Manual Link: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/cot-drainage-manual-searchable.pdf
Design standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention Link:
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/engineering-code/updated-retention-detention-manual.pdf

Site Engineering Comments:
1. Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1025-00276, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.
2. Revise the general note “No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual.” AM 2-06.4.7.C.2. It currently states “Development standard 3-01.0”
3. Add the general note “A single property owner, property management company, or homeowners’ association (HOA), will be responsible for the management and maintenance of the solid waste collection services and storage area(s) for all development/business occupants.” TSM 8-01.5.1.D
4. Pedestrian circulation is required to connect all buildings, dumpster areas, common areas, and the sidewalk on all the street frontages per TSM 7-01.3.3. Demonstrate how the site connects to all street frontage sidewalks as well as how ADA accessible parking connects to the site’s circulation pathway.
5. Provide a detail displaying trash truck maneuverability for the trash enclosure in compliance with Technical Standards Manual 8-01.5.3 or address ES comment 4.
6. The required clearance is 14x40 feet with a required height clearance of 25ft. TSM 8-01.0.0. Please show this required space delineated for the trash enclosures.
7. Keynote #15 on sheet 4 calls for a retaining wall – if this falls in the actual classification of a retaining wall, it will require that a structural wall permit with structural calculations/drawings will be required for submission for construction.
8. Clearly show downspouts and sidewalk scuppers for the building to ensure that stormwater from roof drains, up to and including flow from the ten-year storm event, does not pass over sidewalks per Technical Standards Manual 7-01.4.3E.
9. Sheet 4 calls out keynote #20 as 8-inch curb but appears to point towards what is assumed as keynote #18. Revise accordingly.
10. Address all Environmental Services comments
11. Show compliance with the required the 2-foot minimum grading setback from the property line on the grading plan TSM 2-01.9.0
12. Per the drainage report, a floodplain use permit for work within a floodplain will be required for work done on northern portion of site along 14th ST. This will cover the scope of work done in relation to DP TD-DEV-1025-00276
13. Any new development will include some method of peak discharge and/or volumetric runoff reduction. Detention facilities may be omitted from project design if a waiver of this requirement is granted by the Floodplain Administrator. A fee may be required. Waivers may be granted when the parcel to be developed is less than 1 acre in size; is located within proximity to a major watercourse; is of low residential density (less than two residences per acre) and maintains the natural drainage patterns; or when other engineering justification acceptable to the Floodplain Administrator can be demonstrated. DSSDR 1.2.1
14. Provide a callout for the potential gate/entrance to the parking area if there exists a gate. Due to Stone AV being designated as a Collector RD, it is required to show vehicle maneuverability to demonstrate how a vehicle who attempts to use closed/gated off entrances can turn around onsite without having to back up into Stone AV ROW.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact
Marco Contreras
Marco.contreras@tucsonaz.gov
12/05/2025 Site Landscape Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REVIEWER: CHAD KELLER, RLA
SITE LANDSCAPE/NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION SECTION

PROJECT: NEW 4-STORY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ACTIVITY NO: TD-DEV-1025-00276
ADDRESS: 375 S STONE AV
ZONING: C-3 COMMERCIAL ZONE
LAND USE: MULTIFAMILY
12.05.2025

THE PROPOSED PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PER THE CITY OF TUCSON UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL (TSM), AND ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL (AM) FOR SITE LANDSCAPE, NATIVE PLANTS, AND RAINWATER HARVESTING.

RESUBMIT REVISED DRAWINGS ALONG WITH A DETAILED RESPONSE LETTER, STATING HOW ALL OF THE SITE LANDSCAPE AND NPPO SECTION REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

SITE LANDSCAPE/NPPO SECTION COMMENTS:

1. Prior to site landscape approval, Historic and Design Review for IID comments will need to be fully addressed.

2. This is a unique site and meeting the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance requirements will be extremely difficult as stated in your note number 6 on the commercial rainwater harvesting sheet. All commercial sites are required to be mapped as commercial rainwater harvesting sites on our end whether they functional or not. Please include the water use budget table. Your table will likely be WHIA equal to the Subwatershed area and the number will be low and that is fine. This is more of a record keeping/completeness item for this particular site.

3. Include the development package activity number with your next submittal, TD-DEV-1025-00276.

Thank you.
Chad Keller, RLA
Landscape Architect
chad.keller@tucsonaz.gov
520.837.4923
12/03/2025 Site Zoning Standard REQUIRES RESUBMIT CDRC TRANSMITTAL

FROM:
Bobby Parsons
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT:
All Saints 4 Story Multifamily Residential – 375 S. Stone Ave Tucson, AZ 85701
Development Package (1st Review)
TD-DEV-1025-00276

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 12/3/2025
DUE DATE: 12/2/2025

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 5, 2026.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, TD-DEV-1025-00276, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 – The existing use of this property should be listed as parking and the proposed use should be listed as multifamily. If other uses are proposed on the property, please clearly identify these uses and include any associated Use Specific standards as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed.

3. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.5 – Clearly list the total number of units under site notes as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

4. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6 – Include a note stating “this project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria. UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R).

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a – As this project requires historic review and approval, please include the special district application number as noted by the standard above. Also, the proposed project does not match the associated rezoning Preliminary Development Plan (PDP). Please clarify the discrepancy.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a – As a general note, list the building square footage as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B – As electrical easements are proposed, please include their recordation information as noted by the standard above. Also, the proposed abandonment of easements must be completed prior to approval of this development package.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C – Please provide the information for across S. Stone Avenue as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is made up of three (3) parcels, 11714087B, 11714087D, and 11714087C, a lot combination or a recorded covenant is required. Either provide the approved lot combination request form or a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. Contact Pima County for the Combo Request. The Covenant can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/pdsd/documents/submission-documents/covenant-regarding-development-and-use-of-real-property-udc-with-release.pdf. Also, please clarify if lot 11714086A will be utilizing the parking lot. If so, this lot will need to be included in the covenant.

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 – Please provide the information as noted by the standard above including if the streets are public or private.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5 – Please clarify if there will be a gate at the entrance to the site/parking area. If one is proposed, please demonstrate vehicular maneuverability if the gate is closed and access cannot be obtained.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Per UDC Table 7.4.11-1, multifamily development requires 20% EV capable parking spaces. Please include this calculation in your parking table. Based on the provided parking requirements, 110 spaces are required and only 63 are provided. An Individual Parking Plan (IPP) will be required to account for not meeting the minimum standards. Please reach out to Mark Castro at Mark.Casgtro@tucsonaz.gov for the IPP submittal requirements. Also, as wheel stops are proposed for all parking spaces, please include this information in your parking detail as only the handicap spaces are showing/dimensioning the wheel stops in detail B sheet 6.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d – Please include the information as noted by the standard above including location and a fully dimensioned detail of the short term bicycle parking.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.L – Please address comment 7 as it relates to easements.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R – Pedestrian circulation is required to connect all buildings, dumpster areas, common areas, and the sidewalk on all the street frontages per TSM 7-01.3.3. Demonstrate how the site connects to all street frontage sidewalks as well as how ADA accessible parking connects to the site’s circulation pathway.

2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T - The required clearance for the trash enclosure is 14x40 feet with a required height clearance of 25ft. TSM 8-01.0.0. Please show this required space delineated for the trash enclosures as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V – If applicable, please indicate where the mailboxes are located as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W – If applicable, please show any proposed signage to assure there are not conflicts with other requirements as noted by the standard above.

***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson “Unified Development Code” – Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Bobby Parsons at Robert.Parsons@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and comment response letter. To resubmit visit Tucson Development Center at https://tdc-online.tucsonaz.gov/#/home.
Instructions for resubmittal - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/website/Resubmittals.pdf.
11/03/2025 CDRC Application Completeness Express REVIEW COMPLETED
11/07/2025 CDRC Review Coordinator Express REVIEW COMPLETED EXTERNAL REVIEWERS
CDRC added:, TEP, TAA, ADOT ADDRESSING, HOST, LANSCAPE, REALESTATE, DESIGN REVIEW, ENVIRON SERV, SWG, USPS, and PAG to the workflow. Review request email sent to TEP,TAA ADOT, ADDRESSING and FYI email sent to, SWG USPS PAG.
12/02/2025 Commercial Plumbing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED
12/16/2025 External Reviewers - Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED Re: Permit TD-DEV-1025-00276
jgomes@azdot.gov
on behalf of
ADOT SC Traffic Engineering - ADOT
​CDRC​
​Christian Niemi​
Good Afternoon,

ADOT has no comments on this DEV.

Thank you for the opportunity to review.
11/07/2025 External Reviewers - Pima Association of Governments Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
11/12/2025 External Reviewers - Pima County Addressing Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC​
Good afternoon,

Pima County Addressing approves of TD-DEV-1025-00276.

If the applicant would like unit numbers to be issued as a part of the review, please have floor plans included in the next submittal.


Thank you,






David Wilging

Planner I - Addressing Division

Pima County Development Services

201 N. Stone Avenue 1st Floor

Tucson, Arizona 85701

520-724-6381
11/07/2025 External Reviewers - Southwest Gas Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
11/24/2025 External Reviewers - Tucson Airport Authority Standard REVIEW COMPLETED November 23, 2025
Planning and Development Services
City of Tucson
201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701
RE: TD-DEV-1025-00276, 1st Submittal, New 4-Story Multi-Family Residential / 375 S. Stone
Ave, Tucson, AZ. 85701, Received November 7, 2025
To whom this may concern,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on TD-DEV-1025-00276, 1st Submittal, a
development plan for a new 4-story multifamily residential use at 375 S. Stone Ave. This
development is located in the S.E. quarter of the N.W. quarter of Section 13, Township 14S,
Range 13E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian. The development site occupies parcel number
117-14-087D, covers approximately 0.68 ± acres, and is zoned as Commercial 3 Zone (C-3).
The nearest major roadway intersection is East 14th Street and South Stone Avenue,
approximately 50 feet to the northwest of the subject development.
This site does lie within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and
public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.
The Tucson Airport Authority approves the 1st submittal of this project and is not requiring a
resubmittal of this project.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this
comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-
573-4811.
Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, C.M.
Manager of Planning
cc file
11/07/2025 External Reviewers - United States Postal Service (USPS) Standard REVIEW COMPLETED CDRC sent FYI email sent to PAG, USPS, SWG. No further action is required.
11/03/2025 OK to Submit - Engineering Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
11/05/2025 OK to Submit - Zoning Fast REVIEW COMPLETED
11/25/2025 ROW Review REVIEW COMPLETED